Abstract
Four pigeons were exposed to several nonindependent concurrent variable-interval schedules of reinforcement. One schedule component required a keypecking response; the other component required a treadlepressing response. The birds matched the ratio of their behavior (as measured by responses and time) between the two topographically different responses to the ratio of reinforcement in those two components. When additional foods not contingent on a keypeck or treadle-press were then added, the birds matched time spent in the components to total rates of food delivered in those components; response matching was somewhat disrupted. The matching law, developed under concurrent variable-interval schedules requiring similar responses, can thus account for choice behavior involving topographically different responses.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Baum, W. M. (1974) On two types of deviation from the matching law: Bias and undermatching.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,22, 231–242.
Baum, W. M. (1979) Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choiceJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 32, 269–281.
Baum, W. M., &Rachlin, H. C. (1969) Choice as time allocation.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,12, 861–874.
Brownstein, A. J. &Pliskoff, S. S. (1968) Some effects of relative reinforcement rate and changeover delay in response-independent concurrent schedules of reinforcement.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,11, 683–688.
Davison, M., &Ferguson, D. (1978). The effects of different component response requirements in multiple and concurrent schedules.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,29, 283–295.
de Villiers, P. (1977). Choice in concurrent schedules and a quantitative formulation of the law of effect. In W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.),Handbook of operant behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Elsmore, T. F., Fletcher, G. V., Conrad, D. G., &Sodetz, F. J. (1980). Reduction of heroin intake in baboons by an economic constraint.Pharmacology, Biochemistry & Behavior,13, 729–731.
Fleshler, M., &Hoffman, H. S. (1962). A progression for generating variable interval schedules.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,5, 529–530.
Herrnstein, R. J. (1961). Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,4, 267–272.
Herrnstein, R. J. (1970). On the law of effect.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,13, 242–266.
Hollard, V., &Davison, M. C. (1971). Preference for qualitatively different reinforcers.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,16, 375–380.
Hursh, S. R., &Natelson, B. H. (1981). Electrical brain stimulation and food reinforcement dissociated by demand elasticity.Physiology & Behavior,26, 509–515.
McSweeney, F. K. (1978). Prediction of concurrent keypeck treadle-press responding from simple schedule performance.Animal Learning & Behavior,6, 444–450.
Miller, H. L. (1976). Matching-based hedonic scaling in the pigeon.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,26, 335–347.
Myers, D. L., &Myers, L. E. (1977). Undermatching: A reappraisal of performance on concurrent variable-interval schedules of reinforcement.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,25, 203–214.
Rachlin, H., Battalio, R., Kagel, J., &Green, L. (1981). Maximization theory in behavioral psychology.The Behavioral & Brain Sciences,4, 371–388.
Rachlin, H., &Baum, W. M. (1972). Effects of alternative reinforcement: Does the source matter?Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,18, 231–241.
Stubbs, D. A., &Pliskoff, S. S. (1969). Concurrent responding with fixed relative rate of reinforcement.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,12, 887–897.
Weardon, J. H., &Burgess, I. S. (1982). Matching since Baum (1979).Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,38, 339–348.
Wheatley, K. L., &Engberg, L. A. (1978). Choice performance in several concurrent key-peck treadle-press reinforcement schedules.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,29, 181–190.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hanson, J., Green, L. Time and response matching with topographically different responses. Animal Learning & Behavior 14, 435–442 (1986). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200091
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200091