Abstract
When the first presentation of a neophobic flavor is immediately followed by a distractor flavor, habituation of the neophobic response is typically attenuated. This is manifested by the fact that neophobia is still shown to the target flavor on its second presentation. Three experiments investigated the prediction that this effect will occur only for novel, but not familiar, distractor solutions. Experiments 1 and 2 found that, contrary to this prediction, both novel and familiar distractors can attenuate the habituation of a neophobic response. In Experiment 3, however, when the distractor was made very much more familiar, it lost its ability to interfere with the habituation of neophobia to the target solution. These results are discussed in terms of Wagner’s (1981) theory of habituation.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Atkinson, R. C., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence (Ed.),The psychology of teaming and motivation (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press.
Best, M. R., Gemberling, G. A., &Johnson, P. E. (1979). Disrupting the conditioned stimulus preexposure effect in flavor-aversion learning: Effects of interoceptive distractor manipulations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,5, 321–334.
Green, K. F., &Parker, L. A. (1975). Gustatory memory: Incubation and interferenceBehavioral Biology,13, 359–367.
Konorskj, J. (1967).Integrative activity of the brain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Robertson, D., &Garrud, P. (1983). Variable processing of flavors in rat STM.Animal Learning & Behavior,11, 474–482.
Rodger, R. S. (1975). The number of non-zero, post-hoc contrasts from ANOVA and error-rate I.British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology,28, 71–78.
Wagner, A. R. (1976). Priming in STM: An information processing mechanism for self-generated or retrieval-generated depression in performance. In T. J. Tighe & R. N. Leaton (Eds.),Habituation: Perspectives from child development, animal behavior, and neurophysiology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wagner, A. R. (1978). Expectancies and the priming of STM. In S. H. Hulse, H. Fowler, & W. K. Honig (Eds.),Cognitive processes in animal behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wagner, A. R. (1981). SOP: A model of automatic memory processing in animal behavior. In N. E. Spear & R. R. Miller (Eds.),Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wagner, A. R., Rudy, J. W., &Whitlow, J. W. (1973). Rehearsal in animal conditioning.Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph,97, 407–426.
Westbrook, R. F., Bond, N. W., &Feyer, A.-M. (1981). Short- and long-term decrements in toxicosis-induced odor-aversion learning: The role of duration of exposure to an odor.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,7, 362–381.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by grants from the UK MRC and SERC.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shanks, D.R., Preston, G.C. & Stanhope, K.J. Effects of distractor familiarity on habituation of neophobia. Animal Learning & Behavior 14, 393–397 (1986). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200084
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200084