Abstract
The present experiment determined whether associative strength based upon 15 CS-US pairings at various interstimulus intervals (ISIs) could survive shifts of the ISI to influence the subsequent acquisition of the nictitating membrane (NM) CR. The choice of 15 preshift pairings was based upon previous work, which had shown that this training level produced substantial associative strength without NM CR acquisition. Consequently, this experiment, by shifting the ISI before the beginning of CR acquisition, served as an extension to traditional ISI-shift studies that have imposed the manipulation after CR acquisition. The findings of the experiment indicated that 15 preshift pairings in Stage 1 at ISIs from 250 to 4,000 msec were as effective as 15 pairings at a 500-msec ISI in determining the number of trials to the first NM CR in Stage 2 in which the training ISI was 500 msec. Moreover, 15 pairings in Stage 1 at ISIs from 250 to 2,000 msec were equivalent to 15 pairings at 500 msec in controlling the number of trials to 10 successive NM CRs in Stage 2. These outcomes demonstrate that, within a large ISI range, the associative strength based upon relatively few pairings is preserved despite various shifts of the ISI. Therefore, these results suggest that the reductions in CR performance, which have been consistently observed in traditional studies following ISI shifts, are not due to the loss of associative strength.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bissell, H. S., &Scavio, M. J., Jr. A minicomputer program for the resolution of response frequency and latency in classical conditioning preparations.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 1974,6, 439–442.
Coleman, S. R., &Gormezano, I. Classical conditioning of the rabbit’s (Oryctolagus cunciculus) nictitating membrane response under symmetrical CS-US interval shifts.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1971,77, 447–455.
Ebel, H. C., &Prokasy, W. F. Classical eyelid conditioning as a function of sustained and shifted interstimulus intervals.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1963,65, 52–58.
Gormezano, I. Classical conditioning. In J. B. Sidowski (Ed.),Experimental methods and instrumentation in psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1966.
Gormezano, I. Investigations of defense and reward conditioning in the rabbit. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.),Classical conditioning II: Current theory and research. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1972.
Hull, C. L. Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1943.
Kimmel, H. D., &Burns, R. A. Adaptational aspects of conditioning. In W. K. Estes (Ed.),Handbook of learning and cognitive processes (Vol. 2):Conditioning and behavior theory. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1975.
Martin, I., &Levey, A. B. The genesis of the classical conditioned response. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1969.
Millenson, J. R., Kehoe, E. J., &Gormezano, I. Classical conditioning of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response under fixed and mixed CS-US intervals.Learning and Motivation, 1977,8, 351–366.
Prokasy, W. F. Classical eyelid conditioning: Experimenter operations, task demands, and response shaping. In W. F. Prokasy (Ed.),Classical conditioning. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1965.
Prokasy, W. F., Ebel, H. C., &Thompson, D. D. Response shaping at long interstimulus intervals in classical eyelid conditioning.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1963,66, 138–141.
Prokasy, W. F., &Papsdorf, J. D. Effects of increasing the interstimulus interval during classical conditioning of the albino rabbit.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1965,60, 249–252.
Rescorla, R. A. Pavlovian conditioning and its proper control procedures.Psychological Review, 1967,74, 71–80.
Scavio, M. J., Jr.,Ross, R. T., &McLeod, L. M. Perseveration of associative strength in rabbit nictitating membrane response conditioning.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1983,11, 91–94.
Schneiderman, N., &Gormezano, I. Conditioning of the nictitating membrane of the rabbit as a function of CS-US interval.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1964,69, 226–231.
Smith, M. C., Coleman, S. R., &Gormezano, I. Classical conditioning of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response at backward, simultaneous, and forward CS-US intervals.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1969,69, 226–231.
Wickens, D. D., Nield, A. F., Tuber, D. S., &Wickens, C. D. Strength, latency, and form of conditioned skeletal and autonomic responses as functions of CS-US intervals.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969,80, 165–170.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The research was supported by an Associated Students DAC grant to the first author and a NIMH grant (MH 31935-01) to the second author. The data was included in a Master’s thesis by Robert T. Ross who is now at the University of Iowa.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ross, R.T., Scavio, M.J. Perseveration of associative strength in rabbit nictitating membrane response conditioning following ISI shifts. Animal Learning & Behavior 11, 435–438 (1983). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199799
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199799