Abstract
Semantic priming effects in naming Italian and English words were investigated- Experiments 1 and 2 were in Italian. In Experiment 1, the subjects named a target word, which was either associated with or unrelated to a preceding prime. The results showed semantic priming effects. However, in Experiment 2, in which the same materials occurred in a list that also included pseudowords, priming effects were obtained with the lexical decision task, but not with pronunciation. In Experiment 3, the inclusion of pseudowords in the materials prevented priming effects from occurring in Italian, but not in English. Finally, Experiment 4 indicated that, even in Italian, nonlexical reading was abandoned when a few of the to-be-pronounced items required lexical knowledge for correct stress assignment. The findings suggest that reading normally occurs lexically. The characteristics of the various writing systems, however, are relevant in determining the strategies that people may adopt in unusual circumstances.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Andrews, S. (1982). Phonological recoding: Is the regularity effect consistent?Memory & Cognition,10, 565–575.
Balota, A. D., A Chumbley, J. I. (1985). The locus of word-frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or production?Journal of Memory & Language,24, 89–106.
Baluch, B., A Besner, D., (1991). Strategic use of lexical and nonlexical routines in visual word recognition: Evidence from oral reading in Persian.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 644–652.
Becker, C. A. (1979). Semantic context and word frequency effects in visual word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,5, 252–259.
Becker, C. A. (1980). Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: An analysis of semantic strategies.Memory & Cognition,8, 493–512.
Bentin, S., Bargai, N., & Katz, L. (1984). Orthographic and phonemic coding for lexical access: Evidence from Hebrew.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 353–368.
Bentin, S., & Frost, R. (1987). Processing lexical ambiguity and visual word recognition in a deep orthography.Memory A Cognition,15, 13–23.
Besner, D. (1987). On the relationship between orthographies and phonologies in visual word recognition. In D. A. Allport, D. MacKay, W. Prinz, & E. Scheerer (Eds.),Language perception and production (pp. 211–226). New York: Academic Press.
Besner, D., & Hildebrandt, N. (1987). Orthographic and phonological codes in the oral reading of Japanese Kana.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 335–343.
Bruning, J. L., & Kintz, B. L. (1977).Computational handbook of statistics. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
Carello, C., Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. (1988). Rapid naming is affected by association but not by syntax.Memory & Cognition,16, 187–195.
Chumbley, J. L., & Balota, D. A. (1984). A word’s meaning affects the decision in lexical decision.Memory & Cognition,12, 590–606.
Colombo, L. (1991). The role of lexical stress in word recognition and pronunciation.Psychological Research,53, 71–79.
Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In G. Underwood (Ed.),Strategies of information processing (pp. 151–216). London: Academic Press.
Coltheart, M., Besner, D., Jonasson, J. T., & Davelaar, E. (1979). Phonological recoding in the lexical decision task.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,31, 489–507.
Davelaar, E., Coltheart, M., Besner, D., & Jonasson, J. T. (1978). Phonological recoding and lexical access.Memory & Cognition,6, 391–402.
De Groot, A. M. B. (1984). Primed lexical decision: Combined effects of the proportion of related prime-target pairs and the stimulusonset asynchrony of prime and target.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,36A, 253–280.
De Groot, A. M. B. (1985). Word-context effects in word naming and lexical decision.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,37A, 281–297.
Feldman, L. B., & Turvey, M. T. (1983). Word recognition in Serbo-Croatian is phonologically analytic.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,9, 288–298.
Fischler, I. (1977). Semantic facilitation without association in a lexical decision task.Memory & Cognition,5, 335–339.
Forster, K. I. (1979). Levels of processing and the structure of the language processor. In W. E. Cooper & E. C. Walker (Eds.),Sentence processing (pp. 27–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Forster, K. I. (1981). Priming and the effects of sentence and lexical contexts on naming time; Evidence for automatic processing.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,33A, 465–495.
Forster, K. I., & Chambers, S. M. (1973). Lexical access and naming time.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,12, 627–635.
Frederiksen, J. R., & Kroll, J. F. (1976). Spelling and sound: Approaches to the internal lexical.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,2, 361–379.
Frost, R., Katz, L., & Bentin, S. (1987) Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: A multilingual comparison.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,13, 104–115.
Glanzer, M., & Ehrenreich, S. L. (1979). Structure and search in the internal lexicon.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 381–398.
Henderson, L. (1982).Orthography and visual word recognition in reading. New York: Academic Press.
Hudson, P. T. W., & Bergman, M. W. (1985). Lexical knowledge in word recognition: Word length and word frequency in naming and lexical decision tasks.Journal of Memory & Language,24, 46–58.
Istituto Di Linguisticacomputazionale Di Pisa (1989). Corpus di Barcellona. Unpublished manuscript.
Katz, L., & Feldman, L. B. (1983). Relation between pronunciation and recognition of printed words in deep and shallow orthographies.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,9, 157–166.
Keefe, D. E., & Neely, J. H. (1990). Semantic priming in the pronunciation task: The role of prospective prime-generated expectancies.Memory & Cognition,18, 289–298.
Kihlstrom, J. (1984). Conscious, subconscious, unconscious: A cognitive perspective. In K. S. Bowers & D. Meichenbaum (Eds),The unconscious reconsidered (pp. 149–211). New York: Academic Press.
Lewicki, P. (1986). Processing information about covariations that can not be articulated.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 135–146.
Lukatela, G., Feldman, L. B., Turvey, M. T., Carello, C., & Katz, L. (1989). Context effects in bi-alphabetic word perception.Journal of Memory & Language,28, 214–236.
Lupker, S. J. (1984). Semantic priming without association: A second look.Journal of Verbal learning & Verbal Behavior,23, 709–733.
Meyer, D. M., Schvaneveldt, R. W., & Ruddy, M. (1974). Functions of graphemic and phonemic codes in visual word-recognition.Memory &. Cognition,2, 309–321.
Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,106, 226–254.
Palermo, D. S., &Jenkins, J. J. (1964).Word association norms: Gradeschool through college. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Parisi, D., & Pizzamiglio, G. (1967).Dati auantitativi sulle associazioni verbali di studenti italiani. Rome: Bulzoni.
Patterson, K. E. (1982). The relationship between reading and phonological coding: Further neuropsychological observations. In A. W. Ellis (Ed.),Normality and pathology in cognitive functions (pp. 77–112). London: Academic Press.
Postman, L., &Keppel, G. (Eds.) (1970).Norms of word association. New York: Academic Press.
Rosson, M. B. (1985). The interaction of pronunciation rules and lexical representations in reading aloud.Memory & Cognition,13, 90–99.
Rozin, P., & Gleitman, L. R. (1977), The structure and acquisition of reading. In A. S. Reber & D. L. Scarborough (Eds.),Toward a psychology of reading (pp. 55–141). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rubenstein, H., Lewis, S. S., & Rubenstein, M. A. (1971). Homographic entries in the internal lexicon: Effects of systematicity and relative frequency of meaning.Journal of Verbal Learning A Verbal Behavior,10, 57–62.
Schreuder, R., Flores D’arcais, G. B., & Glazenborg, G. (1984). Effects of perceptual and conceptual similarity in semantic priming.Psychological Research,45, 339–354.
Seidenberg, M. S. (1985a). The time course of information activation and utilization in visual word recognition. In D. Besner, T. G. Walker, & G. E. Mackinnan (Eds.),Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 5, pp. 199–252). New York: Academic Press.
Seidenberg, M. S. (1985b). The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems.Cognition,19, 1–30.
Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.Psychological Review,96, 523–568.
Seidenberg, M. S., & Vidanovic, S. (1985, November).Word recognition in Serbo-Croatian and English: Do they differ? Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Boston.
Seidenberg, M. S., Waters, G. S., Barnes, M. A., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1984). When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition?Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,23, 383–404.
Seidenberg, M. S., Waters, G. S., Sanders, M., & Langer, P. (1984). Pre- and postlexical loci of contextual effects on word recognition.Memory & Cognition,12, 315–328.
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1983). On priming by sentence context.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,112, 1–36.
Swinney, D. A. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Reconsideration of context effects.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,6, 645–659.
Tabossi, P. (1988). Accessing lexical ambiguity in different types of sentential contexts.Journal of Memory & Language,27, 324–340.
Tanenhaus, M. K., Leiman, J. M., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1979). Evidence for multiple stages in the processing of ambiguous words in syntactic contexts.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 427–440.
Theios, J., A Muise, J. G. (1977). The word identification process in reading. In N. J. Castellan, Jr., D. B. Pisoni, & G. R. Potts (Eds.),Cognitive theory (Vol. 2, pp. 289–321). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Turvey, M. T., Feldman, L. B., A Lukatela, G. (1984). The Serbo-Croatian orthography constrains the reader to a phonologically analytic strategy. In L. Henderson (Ed.),Orthographies and reading: Perspectives from cognitive psychology, neuropsychology, and linguistics (pp. 81–89). London: Erlbaum.
Tweedy, J. R., Lapinski, R. H., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1977). Semantic-context effects on word recognition: Influence of varying the proportion of items presented in an appropriate context.Memory & Cognition,5, 84–89.
Waters, G. S., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1985). Spelling-sound effects in reading: Time-course and decision criteria.Memory & Cognition,13, 557–572.
West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (1982). Source of inhibition in experiments on the effect of sentence context on word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,8, 385–399.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant 8700322 from the Ministero Pubbiica Istruzione, Fondi 60%.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tabossi, P., Laghi, L. Semantic priming in the pronunciation of words in two writing systems: Italian and English. Memory & Cognition 20, 303–313 (1992). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199667
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199667