Abstract
Substantial recency effects are found in immediate serial recall of auditory items. These recency effects are greatly reduced when an irrelevant auditory stimulus (a stimulus suffix) is presented. A number of accounts that have been proposed to explain these phenomena assume that auditory items are susceptible to masking or overwriting in memory. Later items overwrite earlier items, leading to an advantage for the last item, unless it is masked by a suffix. This assumption is called into question by evidence that presenting list items in two voices has no beneficial effect in immediate serial recall. In addition, it is shown that suffix effects on both terminal and preterminal list items are influenced by the physical similarity of the suffix to the terminal item and not by the physical similarity of the suffix to preterminal items.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Baddeley, A., &Hull, A. (1979). Prefix and suffix effects: Do they have a common basis?Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 129–140.
Balota, D. A., &Engle, R. W. (1981). Structural and strategic factors in the stimulus suffix effect.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,20, 346–357.
Broadbent, D. E., &Broadbent, M. H. P. (1981). Recency effects in visual memory.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,33A, 1–15.
Broadbent, D. E., &Gregory, M. (1961). On the recall of stimuli presented alternately to two sense-organs.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,13, 103–109.
Campbell, R., &Dodd, B. (1980). Hearing by eye.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,32, 85–99.
Campbell, R., Dodd, B., &Brasher, J. (1983). The sources of visual recency: Movement and language in serial recall.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,35A, 571–587.
Conrad, R., &Hui, L. A. J. (1968). Input modality and the serial position curve in short-term memory.Psychonomic Science,10, 135–136.
Corballis, M. C. (1966). Rehearsal and decay in immediate recall of visually and aurally presented items.Canadian Journal of Psychology,20, 43–51.
Crowder, R. G. (1967). Prefix effects in immediate memory.Canadian Journal of Psychology,21, 450–461.
Crowder, R. G. (1976).Principles of learning and memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Crowder, R. G., &Morton, J. (1969). Precategorical acoustic storage (PAS).Perception & Psychophysics,5, 365–373.
Dalezman, J. J. (1976). Effects of output order on immediate, delayed, and final recall performance.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human teaming & Memory,2, 597–608.
Dallett, K. M. (1965). “Primary memory”: The effects of redundancy upon digit repetition.Psychonomic Science,3, 237–238.
Engle, R. W. (1980). The suffix effect: How many positions are involved?Memory & Cognition,8, 247–252.
Glenberg, A. M. (1987). Temporal context and recency. In D. S. Gorfein & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.),Memory and teaming: The Ebbinghaus Centennial Conference (pp. 173–190). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Glenberg, A. M., &Swanson, N. G. (1986). A temporal distinctiveness theory of recency and modality effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: teaming, Memory, & Cognition,12, 3–15.
Greenberg, S. N-, &Engle, R. W. (1983). Voice change in the stimulus suffix effect: Are the effects structural or strategic?Memory & Cognition,11, 551–556.
Greene, R. L. (1986). Sources of recency effects in free recall.Psychological Bulletin,99, 221–228.
Greene, R. L. (1989). Immediate serial recall of mixed-modality lists.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 266–274.
Greene, R. L., &Crowder, R. G. (1984). Modality and suffix effects in the absence of auditory stimulation.Journal of Verbal teaming & Verbal Behavior,23, 371–382.
Greene, R. L., &Crowder, R. G. (1986). Recency effects in delayed recall of mouthed stimuli.Memory & Cognition,14, 355–360.
Greene, R. L., Elliott, C. L., &Smith, M. D. (1988). When do interleaved suffixes improve recall?Journal of Memory & Language,27, 560–571.
Greene, R. L., &Samuel, A. G., (1986). Recency and suffix effects in serial recall of musical stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 517–524.
Johnson, N. F. (1972). Organization and the concept of a memory code. In A. W. Melton & E. Martin (Eds.),Coding processes in human memory (pp. 125–159). Washington, DC: Winston.
Kaiineman, D., &Henik, A. (1981), Perceptual organization and attention. In M. Kubovy & J. Pomerantz (Eds.),Perceptual organization (pp. 181–212). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Martin, C. S., Mullennix, J. W., Pisoni, D. B., &Summers, W. V. (1989). Effects of talker variability on recall of spoken word lists.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, &. Cognition,15, 676–684.
Mattingly, I- G., Studdert-Kennedy, M., &Magen, H. (1983). Phonological short-term memory preserves phonetic detail.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,73, S4.
Morton, J., Crowder, R. G., &Prussin, H. A. (1971). Experiments with the stimulus suffix effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology,91, 169–190.
Morton, J., Marcus, S. M., Aottley, P. (1981). The acoustic correlates of “speechlike”: A use of the suffix effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,110, 568–593.
Murray, D. J. (1966). Vocalization-at-presentation and immediate recall, with varying recall methods.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,15, 9–18.
Nairne, J. S. (1990). A feature model of immediate memory.Memory & Cognition,18, 251–269.
Nairne, J. S., &Walters, V. L. (1983). Silent mouthing produces modality- and suffix-like effects.Journal of Verbal teaming & Verbal Behavior,22, 475–483.
Penney, C. G. (1985). Elimination of the suffix effect on preterminal list items with unpredictable list length: Evidence for a dual model of suffix effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 229–247.
Penney, C. G. (1989). Modality effects and the structure of short-term verbal memory.Memory & Cognition,17, 398–422.
Spoehr, K. T., &Corin, W. J. (1978). The stimulus suffix effect as a memory coding phenomenon.Memory & Cognition,6, 583–589.
Tulving, E.,&Colotla, V. A. (1970). Free recall of trilingual lists.Cognitive Psychology,1, 86–98.
Watkins, O. C., &Watkins, M. J. (1980). Echoic memory and voice quality: Recency recall is not enhanced by varying presentation voice.Memory & Cognition,8, 26–30.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Greene, R.L. Serial recall of two-voice lists: Implications for theories of auditory recency and suffix effects. Memory & Cognition 19, 72–78 (1991). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198497
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198497