Abstract
Six experiments were conducted to test the relative processing characteristics of picture-plane and three-dimensional imagery as indexed by tasks that required subjects to keep track of successive locations in multiunit visual displays. Subjects were shown symmetrical displays either drawn on cardboard or constructed with three-dimensional blocks. They then were required to imagine these matrices and follow pathways through a series of adjacent squares (blocks) within the matrices. The pathways were described by a series of verbal terms that indicated the direction of the next square (block) in the pathway. Subjects experienced difficulty in performing the task with picture-plane displays composed of as few as 16 squares (4×4), but they rarely made errors with a three-dimensional matrix of 27 blocks (3×3×3). Performance with the three-dimensional task dropped dramatically when the matrix size was increased to 4×4×4. The results replicated previous findings that the image processing capacity for location in two-dimensional imagery is about three units in each direction, and they indicate that adding the depth dimension increases the capacity for representation of spatial location in imagery.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anderson, J. R. (1978). Arguments concerning representation for mental imagery.Psychological Review,85, 249–277.
Attneave, F. (1959).Applications of information theory to psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Aitneave, F. (1972). Representation of physical space. In A. W. Melton & E. Martin (Eds.),Coding processes in human memory (pp. 283–306). Washington DC: Winston.
Attneave, F., &Curlee, T. E. (1983). Locational representation in imagery: A moving spot task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,9, 20–30.
Hake, H. W., &Garner, W. R. (1951). The effect of presenting various numbers of discrete steps on scale reading accuracy.Journal of Experimental Psychology,42, 358–366.
Intons-Peterson, M. J. (1983). Imagery paradigms: How vulnerable are they to experimenters’ expectations?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,9, 394–412.
Keenan, J. M. (1983). Qualifications and clarifications of images of concealed objects: A reply to Kerr and Neisser.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,9, 222–230.
Keenan, J. M., &Moore, R. E. (1979). Memory for images of concealed objects: A reexamination of Neisser and Kerr.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,5, 374–385.
Kerr, N. H. (1983). The role of vision in “visual imagery” experiments: Evidence from the congenitally blind.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,112, 265–277.
Kerr, N. H., &Neisser, U. (1983). Mental images of concealed objects. New evidence.Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, & Cognition,9, 212–221.
Klemmer, E. T., &Frick, F. C. (1953). Assimilation of information from dot and matrix patterns.Journal of Experimental Psychology,45, 15–19.
Kosslyn, S. M. (1980).Image and mind. Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press.
Neisser, U. (1978). Anticipations, images, and introspection.Cognition,6, 169–174.
Neisser, U., &Kerr, N. (1973). Spatial and mnemonic properties of visual images.Cognitive Psychology,5, 138–150.
Pinker, S. (1980). Mental Imagery and the third dimension.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,109, 354–371.
Pylyshyn, Z. N. (1973). What the mind’s eye tells the mind’s brain: A critique of mental imagery.Psychological Bulletin,80, 1–24.
Shepard, R. N., &Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects.Science,171, 701–703.
Weber, R. J., &Malmstrom, F. V. (1979). Measuring the size of mental images.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,5, 1–12.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kerr, N.H. Locational representation in imagery: The third dimension. Memory & Cognition 15, 521–530 (1987). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198387
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198387