Abstract
The extent to which subjects used a probabilistic or a distance judgment process in rating the acceptability of concept exemplars was studied. After viewing 100 descriptions of airline uniforms chosen as fashionable by the public, subjects rated all possible uniforms for their public acceptability. The uniforms were described in terms of four three-valued qualitative (e.g., type of fabric) or quantitative (e.g., jacket length) attributes, with 20 subjects assigned to each description type. The results indicated that the majority of subjects in both groups used some form of probabilistic decision rule, with very few, if any, using a rule based on distance from a prototype. A data analysis technique which permitted examination of the behavior of individual subjects documented a significant amount of inter- and intrasubject variability in the number of aspects incorporated into the judgment process, in the number of different judgment rules utilized for different aspects, and in the types of decision rules used. It was concluded that subjects in earlier studies might well have been attending primarily to frequency differentials but that various methodological difficulties with the acquisition procedures and with the level of data analysis produced ambiguous and sometimes contradictory results.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Reference Note
1.Hayes-Roth, F., & Hayes-Roth, B.A schematic model of abstraction. (Tech. Rep. MMPP 74-2). Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan, Department of Psychology, December 1973.
References
Aiken, L. S., &Griffin, L. R. Visual and auditory processing of common pattern class structure.Perception & Psychophysics, 1972,12, 492–496
Attneave, F. Transfer o1 experience with a class-schema to identification-learning of patterns and shapes.Journal Experimental Psychology, 1957,54, 81–88
Barresi, J., Robibins, D., &Shain, K. Role of distinctive features in the abstraction o1 related concepts.Journal Experimental Psychology Human Learning and Memory, 1975,1, 360–368
Beach, L. R. Cue probabilism and inference behavior.Psychological Monographs. 1964,78, 5(Whole No. 582) (a)
Beach, L. R. Recognition, assimilation, and identification of objects.Psychological Monographs, 1964,78, 6(Whole No. 583). (b)
Bourne, L. E., Jr. An Inference model for conceptual rule learning. In R. L. Solso (Ed.),Theories in cognitive psychology The Loyola symposium. Hillsdale, N. J: Erlbaum, 1974.
Bransford, J. D., &Franks, J. J. The abstraction of linguistic ideas.Cognitive Psychology, 1971,2, 331–350.
Dansereau, D. F., &Brows, B. R. The attribute selection process in pattern perception: The effect of constraint redundancy and stimulus exposure time on the classification of spatially represented Markov patterns.Memory & Cognition, 1974,2, 75–81.
Franks, J. J., &Bransford, J. D. Abstraction of visual patterns.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971,90, 65–74.
Homa, D., &Vosburgh, R. Category breadth and the abstraction of prototypical information.Journal Experimental Psychology Human Learning and Memory, 1976,2, 322–330.
Hyman, R., &Frost, N. H. Gradients and schema m pattern recognition. In P. M. A. Rabbitt & S. Dornic (Eds.),Attention and Performance V. New York: Academic Press, 1975.
Keele, S. W.Attention and human performance. Pacific Palisades. Calif: Goodyear, 1973.
Levine, M.A cognitive theory of learning Research on hypothesis testing. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1975.
Millward, R. B., &Wickens, T. D. Concept-identification models. In D. H. Krantz. R. C. Atkinson, R. D. Luce. & P. Suppes (Eds.),Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology (Vol. 1). San Francisco: W.H. Freeman, 1974.
Neumann, P. G. An attribute frequency model for the abstraction of prototypes.Memory & Cognition, 1974,2, 241–248.
Neumann, P. G. Visual prototype formation with discontinuous representation of dimensions of variability.Memory & Cognition, 1977,5, 187–197.
Peterson, M. J., Meagher, R. B., Jr.Chait, H., &Gillie, S. The abstraction and generalization of dot patterns.Cognitive Psychology, 1973,4, 378–398.
Posner, M. I.Cognition An introduction. Glenview, Ill. Scott, Foresman, 1973.
Reed, S. K. Pattern recognitton and categorization.Cognitive Psychology, 1972,3, 382–407.
Reed, S. K.Psychological processes in pattern recognition. New York: Academic Press, 1973.
Reed, S. K., &Friedman, M. P. Perceptual vs. conceptual categorization.Memory & Cognition, 1973,1, 157–163.
Reitman, J. S., &Bower, G. H. Storage and later recognition of exemplars of concepts.Cognitive Psychology, 1973,4, 194–206.
Rosch, E., &Mervis, C. B. Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories.Cognitive Psychology, 1975.7. 573–605.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was conducted while the first author was on sabbatical leave at the Institute for the Study of Intellectual Behavior at the University of Colorado and is Publication 72 of the Institute. Support for the research was provided by a U.S. Public Health Service special fellowship to the first author, by Research Grant MH-14314 and Research Scientist Award 1-K5-MH-37497 from the National Institute of Mental Health, and by Research Grant GB-340-77X from the National Science Foundation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chumbley, J.I., Sala, L.S. & Bourne, L.E. Bases of acceptability ratings in quasinaturalistic concept tasks. Memory & Cognition 6, 217–226 (1978). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197449
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197449