Abstract
We investigated a phenomenon calledjudgmental overshadowing. Subjects predicted whether each of several patients had a disease on the basis of whether or not the patient had each of two symptoms. For all the subjects, the presence of the disease was moderately contingent on the presence of one ofthe symptoms (S1). In Condition 1 of our first experiment, the presence of the disease was highly contingent on the presence of the other symptom (S2). In Condition 2, the presence of the disease was independent of S2. Judgmental overshadowing occurred in that the S1-disease contingency was judged to be stronger in Condition 2 than in Condition 1. Subsequent experiments showed that judgmental overshadowing depends little on the form of the judgment, is not due to a response bias or contrast effect, and does not depend on subjects’ actively diagnosing each patient. These results are consistent with, and are generally predicted by, an associative-learning model of contingency judgment.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Allan, L. G. (1980). Anote on measurement of contingency between two binary variables in judgment tasks.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,15, 147–149.
Arkes, H. R., &Rothbart, M. (1985). Memory, retrieval, and contingency judgments.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,49 598–606.
Baker, A. G., Mercier, P., Vallée-Tourangeau, F., Frank, R., &Pan, M. (1993). Selective associations and causality judgments: The presence of a strong causal factor may reduce judgments of a weaker one.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 414–432.
Beyth-Marom, R. (1982). Perceptionof correlation reexamined.Memory & Cognition,10, 511–519.
Busemeyer, J. R. (1991). Intuitive statistical estimation. In N. H. Anderson (Ed.),Contributions to information integration theory: Vol. 1. Cognition (pp. 187–215). Hillsdale, NJ: Eribaum.
Husemeyer, J. R., Myung, I. J., &McDaniel, M. A. (1993). Cue-competition effects: Empirical tests of adaptive network learning models.Psychological Science,4. 190–195.
Chapman, G. B. (1991). Trial order affects cue interaction in contingency judgment.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 837–854.
Chapman, G. B., &Robbins, S. J. (1990). Cue interaction in human contingency judgment.Memory & Cognition,18, 537–545.
Cheng, P. W., &Novick, L. R. (1992). Covariation in natural causal induction.Psychological Review,99, 365–382.
Gluck, M. A., &Bower, G. H. (1988). From conditioning to category learning: An adaptive network model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,117, 227–247.
Gluck, M. A., &Bower, G. H. (1990). Component and pattern information in adaptive networks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,119, 105–109.
Hastie, R., &Park, B. (1986). The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line.Psychological Review,93, 258–268.
Jaccard, J., &Wood, G. (1988). The effects of incomplete information on the formation of attitudes toward behavioral alternatives.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,54, 580–591.
Jones, G. V. (1983). Identifying basic categories.Psychological Bulletin,94, 423–428.
Jones, G. V. (1985). Disinterring the Spearman-Thomson coefficient of association,n JK /√n J n K .British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology,38, 122–123.
Lipe, M. G. (1990). Alens model analysis of covariation research.Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,3, 47–59.
Manis, M., Nelson, T. W., &Shedler, J. (1988). Stereotypes and social judgment: Extremity, assimilation, and contrast.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,55, 28–36.
Medin, D. L., &Edelson, S. M. (1988). Problem structure and the use of base-rate information from experience.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,117, 68–85.
Rescorla, R. A., &Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and non-reinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.),Classical conditioning II: Current theory and research (pp. 64–99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Schneider, W. (1988). Micro Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBM PCcompatibles.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,20, 206–217.
Shaklee, H., &Mims, M. (1982). Sources of error in judging event covariations: Effects of memory demands.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,8, 208–224.
Shanks, D. R. (1990). Connectionism and human learning: Critique of Gluck and Bower (1988).Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,119, 101–104.
Shanks, D. R., &Dickinson, A. (1987). Associative accounts of causality judgment. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 21, pp. 229–261). New York: Academic Press.
Smedslund, J. (1963). The concept of correlation in adults.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,4, 165–173.
Wagner, A. R. (1969). Stimulus selection and a “modified continuity theory.” In G. H. Bower & J. T. Spence (Eds.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 3, pp. 1–41). New York: Academic Press.
Waldmann, M. R., &Holyoak, K. J. (1992). Predictive and diagnostic learning within causal models: Asymmetries in cue competition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,121, 222–236.
Ward, W. C., &Jenkins, H. M. (1965). The display of information and the judgment ofcontingency.Canadian Journal of Psychology,19, 231–241.
Wright, G., &Whalley, P. (1983). The supra-additivity of subjective probability. In B. P. Stigum & F. Wenstop (Eds.),Foundations of utility and risk theory with applications (pp. 233–244). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
Yates, J. F. (1990).Judgment and decision making. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Yates, J. F.,&Curley, S. P. (1986). Contingency judgment: Primacy effects and attention decrement.Acta Psychologica,62, 293–302.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This material isbased on work supported under a National Science Foundation Graduate Fellowship to the first author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Price, P.C., Frank Yates, J. Judgmental overshadowing: Further evidence of cue interaction in contingency judgment. Memory & Cognition 21, 561–572 (1993). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197189
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197189