Abstract
The lexical decision task was used to investigate interpretative processing of isolated novel compounds (noun-noun nominals). On the basis of interpretability ratings, novel compounds were classified as being of either high or low interpretability. In alexical decision task in which novel compounds functioned as nonwords, a significant interferetice effect was found for compounds of high interpretability. In a naming task, no differences were found between the two types of novel compounds, but lexicalized compounds resulted in shorter latencies than did novel compounds. Novel compounds were also shown to be interpreted under conditionsunfavorable tomorphological decomposition, suggesting that the interpretation process is beyond strategic control by the subject. Equal semantic priming effects were obtained for members of established semantic categories and nounsof highly interpretable compounds. Interpretative processes dealing with a limited set of basic semantic relations and analogy with lexicalized compounds are discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Barsalou, L. W. (1983). Ad hoc categories.Memory & Cognition,11, 211–227.
Boase-Beier, J. (1987).Poetic compounds (pp. 37–84). Tubingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
Burnage, G. (1990).CELEX, Aguidefor users. Nijmegen: CELEX, University of Nijmegen.
Butterworth, B. (1983). Lexical representation. In B. Butterworth (Ed.),Languageproduction. Vol. II: Development, writing and other language processes (pp. 257–294). London: Academic Press.
Caramazza, A., Laudanna, A., &Romani, C. (1988). Lexical access and inflectional morphology.Cognition,28, 297–332.
Chumbley, J. I., &Balota, D. A. (1984). A word’s meaning affects the decision in lexical decision.Memory & Cognition,12, 590–606.
Clark, E. V., &Berman, R. A. (1987). Types of linguistic knowledge: Interpreting and producing compound nouns.Journal of Child Language,14, 547–567,
Clark, E. V., &Clark, H. H. (1979). When nouns surface as verbs.Language,55, 767–811.
Cohen, B., &Murphy, G. L. (1984). Models of concepts.Cognitive Science,8, 27–58.
Coulmas, F. (1987). New words, complexity and arbitrariness. In T. T. Ballmer & W. Wildgen (Eds.),Process linguistics (pp. 227–251). Tubingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
De Groot, A. M. B. (1980).Mondelinge woord associatie normen. Lisse: Swets en Zeitlinger.
Downing, P. (1977). On the creation and use of English compound nouns.Language,53, 810–842.
Forster, K. I. (1976). Accessing the mental lexicon. In R. J. Wales & E. Walker (Eds.),New approaches to language mechanisms (pp. 257–287). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Forster, K. I. (1979). Levels of processing and the structure of the language processor. In W. E. Cooper & E. C. T. Walker (Eds.),Sentence processing (pp. 27–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Geer, S. E., Gleitman, H., &Gleitman, L. (1972). Paraphrasing and remembering compound words.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,11, 348–355.
Gerrig, R. J. (1986). Process and products of lexical access.Language & Cognitive Processes,1, 187–195.
Gerrig, R. J. (1989). The time course of sense creation.Memory & Cognition,17, 194–207.
Gleitman, L. R., &Gleitman, H. (1970).Phrase and paraphrase: Some innovative uses of language. New York: Norton.
Glucksberg, S., Gildea, P., &Bookin, H. B. (1982). On understanding nonliteral speech: Can people ignore metaphors?Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,21, 85–98.
Hampton, J. A. (1987). Inheritance of attributes in natural concept conjunctions.Memory & Cognition,15, 55–71.
Hampton, J. A. (1988). Overextension of conjunctive concepts: Evidence for a unitary model of concept typicality and class inclusion.Journal of Erperimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 12–32.
Henderson, L. (1982).Orthography and word recognition in reading. London: Academic Press.
Hudson, P. T. W. (1982).Preliminary category norms for verbal items in 52 categories in Dutch (Internal Rep.). Nijmegen: University of Nijmegen, Vakgroep Psychologische Funktieleer.
James, C. T. (1975). The role of semantic information in lexical decisions.Journal of Eperimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,1, 130–136.
Jastrzemsski, J. E. (1981). Multiple meanings, number of related meanings, frequency of occurrence, and the lexicon.Cognitive Psychology,13, 278–305.
Levi, J. N. (1978).The syntax and semantics of complex nominals. London: Academic Press.
Li, C. (1971).Semantics and the structure of compounds in Chinese. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California. Berkeley.
Lupker, S. J. (1984). Semantic priming without association: A second look.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,23, 709–733.
Medin, D. L., &Shoben, E. J. (1988). Context and structure in conceptual combination.Cognitive Psychology,20, 158–190.
Monsell, S. (1985). Repetition and the lexicon. In A. Ellis (Ed.),Progress in the psychology of language (Vol. 2, pp. 147–195). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Murphy, G. L. (1988). Comprehending complex concepts.Cognitive Science,12, 529–562.
Murphy, G. L. (1990). Noun phrase interpretation and conceptual combination.Journal of Memory & Language,29, 259–288.
Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.),Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264–336). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rubin, G. S., Becker, C. A., &Freeman, R. H. (1979). Morphological structure and its effect on visual word recognition.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 757–767.
Schreuder, R. (1990). Lexical processing of verbs with separable particles. In G. E. Booy & J. van Marle (Eds.),Yearbook of morphology (Vol. 3, pp. 65–79). Amsterdam: Foris.
Schreuder, R., Flores D’Arcais, G. B., &Glazenborg, G. (1984). Effects of perceptual and conceptual similarity in semantic priming.Psychological Research,45, 339–354.
Seidenberg, M. S., Waters, G. S., Sanders, M., &Langer, P. (1984). Pre- and postlexical loci of contextual effects on word recognition.Memory & Cognition,12, 315–328.
Selkirk, E. 0. (1982).The syntax of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Smith, E. E., Osherson, D. N., Rips, L. J., &Keane, M. (1988). Combining prototypes: A selective modification model.Cognitive Science,12, 485–527.
Taft, M. (1985). The decoding of words in lexical access: A review of the morphographic approach. In D. Besner, T. G. Waller, & G. E. MacKinnon (Eds.),Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 5, pp. 83–123). London: Academic Press.
Taft, M., &Forster, K. I. (1976). Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,15, 607–620.
Uit Den Boogaart, P. C. (1975).Woordfrequenties in geschreven en gesproken Nederlands (Word frequencies in written and spoken Dutch). Utrecht: Oosthoek, Scheltema, & Holkema.
Van Dale (1984).Groot Woordenboek der Nederlandse Taal. Utrecht/Antwerpen: Van Dale Lexicografie.
Van Jaarsveld, H. J., &Rattink, G. E. (1988). Frequency effects in the processing of lexicalized and novel nominal compounds.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,17, 447–473.
Whaley, C. P. (1978). Word-nonword classification time.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,17, 143–154.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Coolen, R., Van Jaarsveld, H.J. & Schreuder, R. The interpretation of isolated novel nominal compounds. Memory & Cognition 19, 341–352 (1991). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197138
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197138