Abstract
The effects of levels-of-processing and word frequency were directly compared in three different memory tests. In the episodic recognition test, the subjects decided whether or not a word or a pronounceable nonword had been previously studied. In the two lexical decision tests with either pronounceable or unpronounceable nonwords as distractors, the subjects decided whether a test item was a word or a nonword. There were four main results: (1) in all three tests, reaction times (RTs) in response to studied words were faster if they had received semantic rather than rhyme processing during study; (2) in the episodic recognition test, RTs were faster for low- than for high-frequency words; in both lexical decision tests, RTs were faster for high- than for low-frequency words, though less so when the non word distractors were unpronounceable; (3) prior study facilitated lexical decisions more in response to low- than to high-frequency words, thereby attenuating the word-frequency effect, but more so when the nonword distractors were pronounceable; (4) in the lexical decision test with pronounceable nonword distractors, relative to prior rhyme processing, prior semantic processing facilitated performance more for high- than for low-frequency words, whereas the opposite was the case in the episodic recognition test. Discussion focused on the relationship of these results to current views of the mechanisms by which (1) word frequency and depth of processing affect performance in implicit and explicit memory tests, and (2) repetition priming attenuates word-frequency effects for lexical decisions.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Balota, D. A. (1983). Automatic semantic activation and episodic memory encoding.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 88–104.
Balota, D. A., &Chumbley, J. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access; The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 340–357.
Balota, D. A.. &Neely, J. H. (1980). Test-expectancy and word frequency effects m recall and recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Learning & Memory,6, 576–587
Besner, D, &:Swan, M. (1982). Models of lexical access m visual word recognition.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.34A. 313–325.
Blaxton, T. A (1985).Examining theoretical accounts of dissociations among memory measures. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Clark, H. H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy A critique of language statistics In psychological researchJournal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,12, 335–359
Craik, F I. M., &:Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing. A framework for memory researchJournal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,11,671–684.
Craik, F. I. M., &Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memoryJournal of Experimental Psychology. General,104, 268–294.
Durğunoglu, A, &Neely, J. H. (1987). On obtaining episodic priming in a lexical decision task following paired-associate learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 206–222
Eysenck, M. W (1979) Depth, elaboration, and distinctiveness In L. S Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.),Levels of processing in human memory (pp 89–118). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Forster, K I, &Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation In lexical access.Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 680–698
Glanzer, M, &Adams, J. K (1985). The mirror effect in recognition memoryMemory & Cognition,13, 8–20.
Glanzer, M, &Bowles, N. (1976) Analysis of the word frequency effect m recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,2, 21–31
Glanzer, M, &Ehrenreich, S L (1979) Structure and search of the internal lexicon.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 381–398
Gordon, B (1983). Lexical access and lexical decision: Mechanisms of frequency sensitivityJournal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 24–44.
Graf, P, &Mandler, G (1984). Activation makes words more accessible, but not necessarily more retrievable.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,23, 553–568.
Graf, P., Mandler, G., &Haden, P. (1982). Simulating amnesic symptoms in normal subjects.Science,218, 1243–1244.
Graf, P., &Schacter, D L (1985) Implicit and explicit memory for new associations in normal and amnesic subjects.Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning. Memory, & Cognition,11.501–518
Graf, P, Squire.L R., &Mandler, G (1984). The information that amnesic patients do not forget.Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, & Cognition,9, 164–178
Gregg, V. (1976) Word frequency, recognition and recall. In J Brown (Ed.),Recall and recognition (pp 183–216). New York: Wiley.
Hayman, C A G (1983).A task analysts of lexical decisions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada
Jacoby, L. L. (1983) Remembering the data. Analyzing interactive processes In reading.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 485–508.
Jacoby, L. L., &Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology. General,110, 306–340.
James, C. T. (1975). The role of semantic information in lexical decisions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,1, 130–136.
Johnston, W. A., Dark, V. J., &Jacoby, L. L. (1985). Perceptual fluency and recognition Judgments.Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 3–11.
Kirsner, K, Milech, D., &Standen, P. (1983). Common and modality-specific processes in the mental lexicon.Memory & Cognition,11, 621–630.
Kirsner, K., &Smith, M. C. (1974). Modality effects m word IdentificationMemory & Cognition,2. 637–640.
Kucera, H., &Francis, W. N (1967).Computational analysis of present day American English Providence, RI: Brown University Press
Logan, G. (1988). Toward an Instance theory of automatization.Psychological Review,95, 492–527.
Mandler, G, Goodman, G. O., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. L (1982). The word-frequency paradox In recognitionMemory & Cognition,10, 33–42.
Mckoon, G, &Ratcliff, R. (1979). Priming in episodic and semantic memoryJournal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 463–480.
Mitterer, J O., &Begg, I (1979) Can meaning be extracted from rneaningless stimuli?Canadian Journal of Psychology,33,193–197
Monsell, S. (1985) Repetition and the lexicon. In A. W. Ellis (Ed.),Progress m the psychology of language (pp. 147–195) London Erlbaum.
Morris, C D, Bransford, J D, &Franks, J. J. (1977) Levels of processmg versus transfer appropriate processingJournal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,16, 519–533.
Moscovitch, M (1982) A neuropsychological approach to perception and memory in normal and pathological aging. In F l. M. Craik & S Trehub (Eds),Memory and cognitive processes in aging (pp 55–79) New York Plenum Press.
Neely, J H. (1977) Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limitedcapacity attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,106, 226–254
Neelv, J. H (1980, May)The role of expectancy in the word-frequency effect in a lexical decision task. Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwestern Psychological association, Chicago.
Neely, J H (1989). Expenmentald1ssocIatIons and the episodic/semantic memory distinction In H. L. Roedigerill and F. I. M. Craik (Eds.),Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays III honor of Endel Tulving (pp 229–270). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Neely, J H., &Durgunoglu, A. (1985). Dissociative episodic and semantic priming effects In episodic recognition and lexical decision tasksJournal of Memory & Language,24, 466–489
Neely, J H, &Payne, D G. (1983). A direct comparison of recognition failure rates for recallable names In episodic and semantic memory testsMemory & Cognition,11, 161–171
Norris, D. (1984). The effects of frequency, repetition and stimulus quality In visual word recognition.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,36A, 507–518
Richardson-klavehn, A, &Bjork, R. A (1988). Measures of memory.Annual Review of Psychology, 39, 475–543.
Roediger, H L (1984) Does current evidence from dissociation experiments favor the episodic/semantic memory distinction?Behavioral & Brain Sciences,7, 252–254.
Roediger, H. L., &Blaxton, T. A. (1987). Retrieval modes produce dissociations in memory for surface information. In D S Gorfein & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.),Memory and cognitive processes: The Ebbmghaus Centenrual Conference (pp. 349–379). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Roediger, H L., Weldon, M. S., & Stadler, M A. (1987, November).Direct comparison of two Implicit measures of retention. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Seattle, WA.
Scarborough, D. L, Cortese, C., &Scarborough, H. S. (1977). Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,3, 1–17.
Schacter, D. L. (1987). Implicit memory: History and current status.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 501–518.
Schulman, A. I. (1976). Memory for rare words previously rated for familiarity.Journal of Experimental Psychology- Human Learning & Memory,2, 301–307.
Shepard, R. N. (1967). Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,6, 156–163.
Shulman, H. G., &Davison, T. C. B. (1977). Control properties of semantic coding in a lexical decision taskJournal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,16, 92–98.
Shulman, H. G., Hornak, R., &Sanders, E. (1978) The effects of graphemic, phonetic, and semantic relationships on access to lexical structures.Memory & Cognition,6, 115–123.
Squire, L R., Shimamura, A. P., &Graf, P. (1987). Strength and duration of priming effects in normal subjects and mnesic patients.Neuropsychologia,25, 195–210.
Stanners, R. F., Jastrzembskl, J E, &Westbrook, A. (1975). Frequency and visual quality 10 a word-nonword classification task.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,14, 259–264.
Tulving, E. (1985) How many memory systems are there?American Psychologist,40, 385–398.
Winer, B J. (1971)Statistical principles In experimental design New York: McGraw-HilI.
Wolford, G., &Morrison, F. (1980). Processing of unattended visualinformation, Memory & Cognition,8, 521–527
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was conducted by Janet M. Duchek in partial fulfillment of the requirements for an M.S. degree at the University of South Carolina, under the direction of James H Neely. Preparation of the manuscnpt was supported In part by an XL grant from Purdue Research Foundation and by NICHHD Grant ROI HDlSOS4, both to James H Neely.
This research was reported at the annual meeting of the Southeastern Psychological Association, held in Atlanta in March. 1979.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Duchek, J.M., Neely, J.H. A dissociative word-frequency X levels-of-processing interaction in episodic recognition and lexical decision tasks. Memory & Cognition 17, 148–162 (1989). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197065
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197065