Abstract
In this paper, we propose a new version of the phoneme monitoring task that is well-suited for the study of lexical processing. The generalized phoneme monitoring (GPM) task, in which subjects detect target phonemes appearing anywhere in the test words, was shown to be sensitive to associative context effects. In Experiment 1, using the standard phoneme monitoring procedure in which subjects detect only word-initial targets, no effect of associative context was obtained. In contrast, clear context effects were observed in Experiment 2, which used the GPM task. Subjects responded faster to word-initial and word-medial targets when the target-bearing words were preceded by an associatively related word than when preceded by an unrelated one. The differential effect of context in the two versions of the phoneme monitoring task was interpreted with reference to task demands and their role in directing selective attention. Experiment 3 showed that the size of the context effect was unaffected by the proportion of related words in the experiment, suggesting that the observed effects were not due to subject strategies.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Cutler, A., Mehler, J., Norris.D, &Segui, J (1987) Phoneme Identification and the lexicon.Cognitive Psychology,19,141–177
Cutler, A, &Norris, D. (1979). Monitoring sentence comprehension. In W E. Cooper & ETC. Walker (Eds.),Sentence processing: Psycholinguistic studies presented 10 Mernll Garrett (pp 113–134). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Den Heyer, K., Briand, K, &Dannenbring, G L (1983) Strategic factors in a lexical decision task. EVidence for automatic attention and attention driven processesMemory & Cogniuon,11, 374–381
Foss, D J (1969). Decision processes during sentence comprehension Effects of lexical Item difficulty and position upon decision timesJournal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,8, 457–462
Foss, D. J (1975) On the time-course of sentence comprehension In F. Bresson & J Mehler (Eds.),Current approaches to problems In psycholinguistics Pam: CNRS
Foss, D. J, &Blank, M A (1980) Identifying the speech codesCognitive Psychology,12, 1–31.
Foss, D. J, &Gernsbacher, M. A. (1983). Cracking the dual code Toward a unitary model of phoneme rdentificatronJournal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 609–632
Foss, D J, &Jenkins, C M (1973) Some effects of context on the comprehension of ambiguous sentencesJoumal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,12, 577–588.
Foss, D. J., &Lynch, R H (1969) Decision processes during sentence comprehension Effects of surface structure on decision timesPerception & Psychophysics,5, 145–148
Foss, D. J., &Swinney, D. A (1973). On the psychological reality of the phoneme Perception, identification and consciousnessJournal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,12, 246–257
Frauenfelder, U. H., Segui, J, & Dijkstra, T (1987) Lexical effects in phoneme monitoring: Facilitatory or inhibitory?Proceedings of the 11 th lnternational Congress of Phonetic Science (pp 105–107) Tallinn, USSR
Lieury, A., Iff, M., &Duris, P (1976)Normes d’associations verbales. Pans: Laboratoire de Psychologie Expénrnentale
Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1984). Function and processes in spoken and word recognition. In H Bouma & D G Bouwhuis (Eds ),Attention and performance: Control of language processes (pp 125–150) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Mcclelland, J. L.,&Elman, J L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception.Cognitive Psychology,18, 1–86.
Meyer, D E., &Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words Evidence of dependence between retrieval operations.Journal of Experimental Psychology,90, 227–234
Morton, J.,&Long, J (1976) Effect of word transrtron probability on phoneme IdentificationJoumal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 15, 43–51
Nusbaum, H. C , Walley, A. C ,Carrell, T D, & Ressler, W H (1982)Controlled perceptual strategies In phoneme restoration (Research on Speech Perception Progress Report 8, 83–103) Bloomington Indiana University
Rubin, P, Turvey, M T, &Van Gelder, P (1976) Initial phonemes are detected faster m spoken words than in non-wordsPerception & Psychophysics,19, 394–398.
Samuel, A G., &Ressler, W H (1986). Attention within auditory word perception Insights from the phoneme restoration illusionJournal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance,12, 70–79
Segui, J, &Frauenfelder, U (1986) The effect of lexical constraints upon speech perception In F. Klix & H Hagendorf (Eds),Human Memory & Cognitive Abtlittes: Symposium m Memonam Hermann Ebbinghaus (pp 795–808). Amsterdam North-Holland.
Segui, J, Frauenfeiller, U, &Mehler, J (1981). Phoneme monitoring. syllable monitoring, and lexical accessBritish Journal of Psychology,72, 471–477
Seidenberg, M. S, Waters, G S, Sanders, M, &Langer, P (1984) Pre- and postlexical locr of contextual effect, on word recognitionMemory & Cognition,12, 315–328
Stemberger, J P, Elman, J L., &Haden, P (1985) Interference between phonemes during phoneme monitoring. Evidence for an in teractive activation model of speech perceptionJournal of Expenmental Psychology Human Perception & Performance,11, 475–489
Tweedy, J R, Lapinski, R H, &ScHvaneveldt, R W (1977) Semantic context effects on word recognition Influence of varying the proportion of Items presented m an appropriate contextMemory & Cognition,5, 84–89
Warren, R. M. (1970) Perceptual restoration of missing speech soundsScience,167, 392–393
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Frauenfelder, U.H., Segui, J. Phoneme monitoring and lexical processing: Evidence for associative context effects. Memory & Cognition 17, 134–140 (1989). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197063
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197063