Abstract
In their area of expertise experts know more potentially interfering facts than nonexperts do, yet their memory IS superior to that of nonexperts. This has been termed the “paradox of interference.” We proposed that the ability of experts to go beyond the information given allows them to infer the presence of items that might not otherwise be remembered. However, such inferences can also be detrimental to accurate recognition memory in that such inferences might become confused with actual targets. We examined the benefits and costs of expertise in two recognition memory experiments In which experts and nonexperts participated. Experts in Ex-penment 1 were knowledgeable about baseball; those in Experiment 2 were knowledgeable about Ohio geography. Distractors in both studies bore a synonymous, an inferential, or no special relation to the targets. In the last instance, experts had recognition memory superior to that of the nonexperts. When the distractors were related to the targets, however, the non-experts were superior. We proposed that experts' inferential behavior is a contributor to their generally superior memory, but that task demands can convert this asset into a liability.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anderson, J. R.Language, memory, and thought. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1976.
Anderson, J. R., &Bower, G. H.Human associative memory. Washington, D.C: Hemisphere Press, 1973.
Arkes, H. R., &Harkness, A. R. The effect of making a diagnosis on subsequent recognition of symptoms.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1980,6, 568–575.
Bransford, J. D., Barclay, J. R., &Franks, J. J. Sentence memory: A constructive versus interpretive approach.Cognitive Psychology, 1972,3, 193–209.
Bruner, J. S. Going beyond the information given. In H. Gruber, K. Hammond, & R. Jesser (Eds.),Contemporary approaches to education. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1957.
Charness, N. Components of skill in bridge.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1979,33, 1–15.
Chase, W. G., &Simon, H. A. Perception in chess.Cognitive Psychology, 1973,4, 55–81.
Chiesi, H. L., Spilich, G. J., &Voss, J. F. Acquisition of domain-related information in relation to high and low domain knowledge.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1979,18, 257–274.
Degroot, A. D.Thought and choice in chess. The Hague: Mouton, 1965.
Egan, D. E., &Schwartz, B. J. Chunking in recall of symbolic diagrams.Memory & Cognition, 1979,7, 149–158.
Fischhoff, B. Debiasing. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.),Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
Flesch, R. F. A new readability yardstick.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1948,32, 221–233.
Harris, R. J. Inferences in information processing. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 15). New York: Academic Press, 1981.
Johnson, M. K., Taylor, T. H., Raye, C. Fact and fantasy: The effects of internally generated events on the apparent frequency of externally generated events.Memory & Cognition, 1977,5, 116–111.
Martin, E. Transfer of verbal paired associates.Psychological Review, 1965,72, 317–343.
Osgood, C. E. The similarity paradox in human learning: A resolution.Psychological Review, 1949,56, 132–143.
Reder, L. M., &Anderson, J. R. A partial resolution of the paradox of interference: The role of integrating knowledge.Cognitive Psychology, 1980,12, 447–472.
Reder, L. M., &Ross, B. H. Integrated knowledge in different tasks: The role of retrieval strategy on fan effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1983,9, 55–72.
Reitman, J. S. Skilled perception in Go: Deducing memory structures from inter-response times.Cognitive Psychology, 1976,8, 336–356.
Schank, R. C., &Abelson, R. P.Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1977.
Smith, E. E., Adams, N., &Schorr, D. Fact retrieval and the paradox of interference.Cognitive Psychology, 1978,10, 438–464.
Sulin, R. A., &Dooling, D. J. Intrusion of a thematic idea in retention of prose.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974,103, 255–262.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Arkes, H.R., Freedman, M.R. A demonstration of the costs and benefits of expertise in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition 12, 84–89 (1984). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197000
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197000