Abstract
Three experiments investigated the effects of information order and representativeness on schema abstraction in a category learning task. A set of category members, in which the variability and frequency of member types were correlated, was divided into four study samples. In the high-variance condition, each sample was representative of the allowable variation in the category and the frequency with which it occurred. In the low-variance condition, the initial study sample focused only on the most frequently occurring category members. Subsequent samples gradually introduced exemplars, and hence additional variance, from remaining member types. After the fourth study sample, all subjects in all conditions had seen the same category members. Experiment 1 revealed that transfer performance was better if subjects began with a low-variance sample and were gradually introduced to the allowable variation on subsequent samples than if they consistently saw representative samples. Experiments 2 and 3 suggested that this information-order effect may interact with learning mode: Subjects induced to be more analytic about the material performed better if their initial and subsequent samples were representative of the category variation.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Reference Notes
Fried, L. S., & Holyoak, K. J.Induction of category distributions: A framework for classification learning. (Cognitive Science Tech. Rep. 38). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Department of Psychology, March 1982.
Medin, D. L.Levels of categorization and the integration of new experiences. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Montreal, September 1980.
References
Anderson, J. R., Kline, P. J., &Beasley, C. M. A general learning theory and its application to schema abstraction. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation. New York: Academic Press, 1979.
Anderson, N. R. Application of linear-serial model to a personality impression task using serial presentation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1968,10, 354–362.
Asch, S. E. Forming impressions of personality.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1946,41, 258–290.
Barresi, J., Robbins, D., &Shain, K. The role of distinctive features in the abstraction of related concepts.Journal of experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1975,1, 360–368.
Brooks, L. Nonanalytic concept formation and memory for instances. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.),Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1978.
Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J. J., &Austin, G. A.A study of thinking. New York: Wiley, 1956.
Elio, R., &Anderson, J. R. The effects of category generalizations and instance similarity on schema abstraction.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1981,7, 397–417.
Franks, J. J., &Bransford, J. D. Abstraction of visual patterns.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971,90, 65–74.
Hayes-Roth, B., &Hayes-Roth, F. Concept learning and the recognition and classification of exemplars.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1977,16, 321–338.
Homa, D. Abstraction of ill-defined form.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1978,4, 407–416.
Homa, D., &Vosburgh, R. Category breadth and the abstraction of prototypical information.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1976,101, 322–330.
Hovland, C. L., &Weiss, W. Transmission of information concerning concepts through positive and negative information.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1953,45, 175–182.
Levine, M. Hypothesis behavior by humans during discrimination learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1966,71, 331–338.
Medin, D. L., &Schaffer, M. M. Context theory of classification learning.Psychological Review, 1978,115, 207–238.
Medin, D. L., &Smith, E. E. Strategies and classification learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1981,7, 241–253.
Neumann, P. G. An attribute frequency model for the abstraction of prototypes.Memory & Cognition, 1974,2, 241–248.
Posner, M. I., &Keele, S. W. On the genesis of abstract ideas.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968,77, 353–363.
Reber, A. S. Implicit learning of artificial grammars.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1967,6, 855–863.
Reber, A. S. Implicit learning of synthetic languages: The role of instructional set.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1976,1, 88–94.
Reitman, J. S., &Bower, G. H. Storage and later recognition of exemplars of concepts.Cognitive Psychology, 1973,4, 194–206.
Rosch, E., &Mervis, C. B. Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories.Cognitive Psychology, 1975,7, 573–605.
Rumelhart, D. E., &Norman, D. A. Accretion, tuning, and restructuring: Three modes of learning. In J. W. Cotton & R. Klatzky (Eds),Semantic factors in cognition. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1978.
Trabasso, T., &Bower, G. H. Presolution dimensional shifts in concept identification: A test of the sampling with replacement axiom in all-or-none models.Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1966,3, 163–173.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported in part by an NSF graduate fellowship to the first author, who is now at the Alberta Research Council, and ONR Contract NOOOI4-81-Q335 and NSF Grant IST-80-15357 to the second author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Elio, R., Anderson, J.R. The effects of information order and learning mode on schema abstraction. Memory & Cognition 12, 20–30 (1984). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196994
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196994