Abstract
A stimulus-sampling model of recognition memory is presented that predicts both proactive and retroactive interference. To test the predictions of the model, a recognition memory experiment was carried out using a standard proactive-retroactive design with a forced-choice task. Both accuracy and latency were measured. The data showed, as predicted, equal proactive and retroactive effects on accuracy, providing solid support for the model. The interference effects are interpreted in terms of the model as arising from an increase in indirect marking, the marking of shared stimulus elements in words other than the study word. The model has two parameters representing the rate of indirect marking for high-frequency and low-frequency words and two parameters reflecting the efficiency of direct marking. The latency results completely paralleled the accuracy findings, showing proactive and retroactive effects. A possible extension of the model to handle latencies is considered.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Atkinson, R. C., &Juola, J. F. Factors influencing speed and accuracy of word recognition. In S. Kornblum (Ed.),Attention and performance IV. New York: Academic Press, 1973.
Audley, R. J. A stochastic model for individual choice behavior.Psychological Review, 1960,67, 1–15.
Audley, R. J., &Pike, A. R. Some alternative stochastic models of choice.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1965,11, 207–224.
Bower, G. H. Stimulus-sampling theory of encoding variability. In A. W. Melton & E. Martin (Eds.),Coding processes in human memory. Washington, D.C: Winston, 1972.
Chandler, J. P. STEPIT—Finds local minima of a smooth function of several parameters.Behavioral Science, 1969,14, 81–82.
Donaldson, W., &Murdock, B. Criterion change in continuous recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968,76, 325–330.
Estes, W. K. Statistical theory of spontaneous recovery and regression.Psychological Review, 1955,61, 145–154.
Glanzer, M., &Bowles, N. Analysis of the word-frequency effect in recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1976,1, 21–31.
King, D. R. W., &Anderson, J. R. Long-term memory search: An interesting activation process.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1976,15, 587–605.
Koppell, S. Decision latencies in recognition memory: A signal detection theory analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1977,3, 445–457.
Kučera, H., &Francis, W. N. Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, R.I: Brown University Press, 1967.
Link, S. W. The relative judgment theory of two choice response time.Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1975,11, 114–135.
McCormack, P. D., &Swenson, A. L. Recognition memory for common and rare words.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972,95, 72–77.
Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., & Madigan, S. Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns.Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph, 1968,76(1, pt. 2).
Ratcliff, R. A theory of memory retrieval.Psychological Review, 1978,85, 59–108.
Racliff, R., &Murdock, B. B., Jr. Retrieval processes in recognition memory.Psychological Review, 1976,13, 190–214.
Schulman, A. I. The declining course of recognition memory.Memory & Cognition, 1974,1, 14–18.
Shepard, R. N. Application of a trace model to the retention of information in a recognition task.Psychometrika, 1961,16, 185–203.
Shepard, R. N., &Chang, J. J. Forced-choice tests of recognition memory under steady-state conditions.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1963,1, 93–101.
Shepard, R. N., &Teghtsoonian, M. Retention of information under conditions approaching a steady state.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1961,61, 302–309.
Smith, E. E. Choice reaction time: An analysis of the major theoretical positions.Psychological Bulletin, 1968,69, 77–110.
Underwood, B. J., &Freund, J. S. Word frequency and short-term recognition memory.American Journal of Psychology, 1970,83, 343–351.
Winer, B. J. Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This article is based on a dissertation submitted to New York University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the PhD degree.
Rights and permissions
This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.
About this article
Cite this article
Bowles, N.L., Glanzer, M. An analysis of interference in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition 11, 307–315 (1983). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196977
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196977