Abstract
People often learn multiple classification systems that are relevant to some goal or use. We compared conditions in which subclassification within a category hierarchy was predicted by values on either the same (alignable) or different (nonalignable) dimensions between category hierarchies. The results indicated that learning in alignable conditions occurred in fewer blocks and with fewer errors than did learning in nonalignable conditions. This facilitation was not the result of differences between conditions in the representations learned by the participants, the number of dimensions needed for subclassification (Experiment 1), or the objective complexity of the learning task (Experiment 2). The facilitated learning in the alignable conditions appears to reflect a commitment on the part of the learner to alignment: the belief that the structure relevant to the use of one category system will also be relevant to the use of a comparable system.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anderson, J. R. (1991). The adaptive nature of human categorization.Psychological Review,98, 409–429.
Billman, D. (1996). Structural biases in concept learning: Influences from multiple functions. In D. L. Medin (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 35, pp. 283–321). San Diego: Academic Press.
Boster, J. S., &Johnson, J. C. (1989). Form or function: A comparison of expert and novice judgments of similarity among fish.American Anthropologist,91, 866–889.
Cohen, J. (1988).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy.Cognitive Science,7, 155–170.
Goldstone, R. (1994). The role of similarity in categorization: Providing a groundwork.Cognition,52, 125–157.
Kaplan, A. (2000).Alignability and prior knowledge in category learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
Lassaline, M. E., &Murphy, G. L. (1998). Alignment and category learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 144–160.
Medin, D. L., Lynch, E. B., Coley, J. D., &Atran, S. (1997). Categorization and reasoning among tree experts: Do all roads lead to Rome?Cognitive Psychology,32, 49–96.
Ross, B. H. (1996). Category representations and the effects of interacting with instances.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 1249–1265.
Ross, B. H. (1997). The use of categories affects classification.Journal of Memory & Language,37, 240–267.
Ross, B. H. (1999). Post-classification category use: The effects of learning to use categories after learning to classify.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 743–757.
Ross, B. H. (2000). The effects of category use on learned categories.Memory & Cognition,28, 51–63.
Ross, B. H., &Murphy, G. L. (1999). Food for thought: Crossclassification and category organization in a complex real-world domain.Cognitive Psychology,38, 495–553.
Sifonis, C. M., & Ross, B. H. (1999, August).The effects of alignability on learning the use of categories. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Vancouver, BC.
Waxman, S. R., Lynch, E. B., Casey, K. L., &Baer, L. (1997). Setters and samoyeds: The emergence of subordinate level categories as a basis for inductive inference in preschool-age children.Developmental Psychology,33, 1074–1090.
Wisniewski, E. J., & Markman, A. B. (1997).Feature alignment in concept learning. Unpublished manuscript.
Yamauchi, T., &Markman, A. B. (2000). Learning categories composed of varying instances: The effect of classification, inference, and structural alignment.Memory & Cognition,28, 64–78.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Parts of the present manuscript were presented at the annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Vancouver, BC. This study was supported by NSF Grant SBR 97-20304.
—Accepted by previous editorial team
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sifonis, C.M., Ross, B.H. Alignment effects on learning multiple, use-relevant classification systems. Memory & Cognition 30, 1148–1159 (2002). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194332
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194332