Abstract
It has long been demonstrated that when grouping occurs, attention transfer between grouped elements is facilitated, as compared with attention transfer between elements—similarly distant—that are not grouped. This has been shown for grouping by connectedness, by orientation, and by color. The present article extends these findings to the case of similarity in coarseness. By using spatial cuing to elements drawn with different strokes, it is shown that the visual processing of elements that share stroke heaviness with the cued element is more efficient than that of elements that do not. Three experiments, in which cue validity regarding the target’s location and/or its stroke is manipulated, show that the facilitation has both an endogenous and an exogenous component. The findings are discussed in terms of visual tuning to the features of a stimulus, with tuning being the initial stage of visual processing required for identification and discrimination. It is proposed that grouping, rather than explaining the facilitation observed, can be explained by the notion of visual tuning to features. The findings also point to potential methodological pitfalls when different stroke weights are used, unintentionally, in visual displays.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrams, R. A., &Law, M. B. (2000). Object-based visual attention with endogenous orienting.Perception & Psychophysics,62, 818–833.
Adini, Y., &Sagi, D. (1992). Parallel processes within the “spot-light” of attention.Spatial Vision,6, 61–77.
Avrahami, J. (1999). Objects of attention, objects of perception.Perception & Psychophysics,61, 1604–1612.
Baylis, G. D., &Driver, J. (1992). Visual parsing and response competition: The effect of grouping factors.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 145–162.
Ben-Shahar, O., Scholl, B. J., & Zucker, S. W. (2006).Bridging the gap between object-based attention and texton-based segmentation: How attention flows through orientation-defined textures. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Bundesen, C., &Larsen, A. (1975). Visual transformation of size.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,1, 214–220.
Cepeda, N. J., &Kramer, A. F. (1999). Strategic effects on objectbased attentional selection.Acta Psychologica,103, 1–19.
Davis, E. T. (1981). Allocation of attention: Uncertainty effects when monitoring one or two visual gratings of noncontiguous spatial frequencies.Perception & Psychophysics,29, 618–622.
Davis, E. T., Kramer, P., &Graham, N. (1983). Uncertainty about spatial frequency, spatial position, or contrast of visual patterns.Perception & Psychophysics,33, 20–28.
Davis, G., Driver, J., Pavani, F., &Shepherd, A. (2000). Reappraising the apparent costs of attending to two separate visual objects.Vision Research,40, 1323–1332.
Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,113, 501–517.
Egly, R., Driver, J., &Rafal, R. D. (1994). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,123, 161–177.
Enns, J. T., &Rensink, R. A. (1992).VScope: A general purpose tachistoscope for the Macintosh. Vancouver: Micropsych Software.
Eriksen, B. A., &Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task.Perception & Psychophysics,16, 143–149.
Eriksen, C. W., & St.James, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model.Perception & Psychophysics,40, 225–240.
Farell, B., &Pelli, D. G. (1993). Can we attend to large and small at the same time?Vision Research,33, 2757–2772.
Goldsmith, M., &Yeari, M. (2003). Modulation of object-based attention by spatial focus under endogenous and exogenous orienting. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception & Performance,29, 897–918.
Han, S., Dosher, B. A., &Lu, Z.-L. (2003). Object attention revisited: Identifying mechanisms and boundary conditions.Psychological Science,14, 598–604.
Hübner, R. (1996). The efficiency of different cue types for reducing spatial-frequency uncertainty.Vision Research,36, 401–408.
Julesz, B. (1981). Textons, the elements of texture perception, and their interactions.Nature,290, 91–97.
Kahneman, D., &Henik, A. (1981). Perceptual organization and attention. In M. Kubovy and J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.),Perceptual organization (pp. 181–211). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kramer, A. F., &Jacobson, A. (1991). Perceptual organization and focused attention: The role of objects and proximity in visual processing.Perception & Psychophysics,50, 267–284.
Kramer, A. F., &Watson, S. E. (1996). Object-based visual selection and the principle of uniform connectedness. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.),Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 395–414). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Lamy, D., &Egeth, H. (2002). Object-based selection: The role of attentional shifts.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,64, 52–66.
Lavie, N., &Driver, J. (1996). On the spatial extent of attention in object-based visual selection.Perception & Psychophysics,58, 1238–1251.
Macquistan, A. D. (1997). Object-based allocation of visual attention in response to exogenous, but not endogenous, spatial precues.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 512–515.
Majaj, N. J., Pelli, D. G., Kurshan, P., &Palomares, M. (2002). The role of spatial frequency channels in letter identification.Vision Research,42, 1165–1184.
Ohtani, Y., &Mori, S. (2002). Spatial-frequency uncertainty and cuing effects on psychometric functions for contrast detection.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,9, 270–277.
Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,32, 3–25.
Scholl, B. J. (2001). Objects and attention: The state of the art.Cognition,80, 1–46.
Schyns, P. G., &Oliva, A. (1999). Dr. Angry and Mr. Smile: When categorization flexibly modifies the perception of faces in rapid visual presentations.Cognition,69, 243–265.
Shulman, G. L., &Wilson, J. (1987a). Spatial frequency and selective attention to local and global information.Perception,16, 89–101.
Shulman, G. L., &Wilson, J. (1987b). Spatial frequency and selective attention to spatial location.Perception,16, 103–111.
Solomon, J. A., &Pelli, D. G. (1994). The visual filter mediating letter identification.Nature,369, 395–397.
Sowden, P. T., Özgen, E., Schyns, P. G., &Daoutis, C. (2003). Expectancy effects on spatial frequency processing.Vision Research,43, 2759–2772.
Tanaka, Y., &Sagi, D. (2000). Attention and short-term memory in contrast detection.Vision Research,40, 1089–1100.
Treisman, A., &Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology,12, 97–136.
Treisman, A., &Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries.Psychological Review,95, 15–58.
Yeshurun, Y., &Carrasco, M. (2000). The locus of attentional effects in texture segmentation.Nature Neuroscience,3, 622–627.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Avrahami, J. Selective attention as tuning: The case of stroke weight. Perception & Psychophysics 68, 208–215 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193670
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193670