Abstract
Diverse outcomes, both facilitative and disruptive, have been reported for the effect of interpolated item recognition tests on the acquisition of a cognitive skill. We collected data from a repeated set of 12 artificial arithmetic problems, soliciting compute/retrieve strategy reports after every trial. In one condition, a recognition test was administered after every three blocks of training. Recognition testing was found to depress retrieve frequencies in both younger and older adults, particularly for newly acquired items. Pairing training items with similar recognition foils mitigated these effects. This pattern of results could be explained by assuming that the participants based compute/retrieve decisions on item familiarity or frequency, tracked across both skill trials and recognition trials, and on a threshold influenced by source confusion. Variations in the threshold parameter could lead to depressed reports of item retrieval (our findings) or to elevated retrieval decisions, as has been shown in some other studies.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Ackerman, P. L., &Woltz, D. J. (1994). Determinants of learning and performance in an associative memory/substitution task: Task constraints, individual differences, volition, and motivation.Journal of Educational Psychology,86, 487–515.
Barrouillet, P., &Fayol, M. (1998). From algorithmic computing to direct retrieval: Evidence from number and alphabetic arithmetic in children and adults.Memory & Cognition,26, 355–368.
Compton, B. J., &Logan, G. D. (1991). The transition from algorithm to retrieval in memory-based theories of automaticity.Memory & Cognition,19, 151–158.
Delaney, P. F., Reder, L. M., Staszewski, J. J., &Ritter, F. E. (1998). The strategy-specific nature of improvement: The power law applies by strategy within task.Psychological Science,9, 1–7.
Haider, H., &Frensch, P. A. (2002). Why aggregated learning follows the power law of practice when individual learning does not: Comment on Rickard (1997, 1999), Delaney et al. (1998), and Palmeri (1999).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 392–406.
Hedden, T., &Park, D. C. (2003). Contributions of source and inhibitory mechanisms to age-related retroactive interference in verbal working memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,132, 93–112.
Hoyer, W. J., Cerella, J., &Onyper, S. V. (2003). Item learning in cognitive skill training: Effects of item difficulty.Memory & Cognition,31, 1260–1270.
Loft, S., Humphreys, M., &Neal, A. (2004). The influence of memory for prior instances on performance in a conflict detection task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied,10, 173–187.
Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization.Psychological Review,95, 492–527.
McCarley, J. S., Kramer, A. F., Wickens, C. D., Vidoni, E. D., &Boot, W. R. (2004). Visual skills in airport-security screening.Psychological Science,15, 302–306.
Nosofsky, R. M., &Palmeri, T. J. (1997). An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification.Psychological Review,104, 266–300.
Ofen-Noy, N., Dudai, Y., &Karni, A. (2003). Skill learning in mirror reading: How repetition determines acquisition.Cognitive Brain Research,17, 507–521.
Palmeri, T. J. (1997). Exemplar similarity and the development of automaticity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 324–354.
Ratcliff, R., Spieler, D., &McKoon, G. (2000). Explicitly modeling the effects of aging on response time.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,7, 1–25.
Reder, L. M., &Ritter, F. E. (1992). What determines initial feeling of knowing? Familiarity with question terms, not with the answer.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 435–451.
Rickard, T. C. (1997). Bending the power law: A CMPL theory of strategy shifts and the automatization of cognitive skills.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,126, 288–311.
Rickard, T. C. (2004). Strategy execution in cognitive skill learning: An item-level test of candidate models.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,30, 65–82.
Rogers, W. A., &Gilbert, D. K. (1997). Do performance strategies mediate age-related differences in associative learning?Psychology & Aging,12, 620–633.
Rogers, W. A., Hertzog, C., &Fisk, A. D. (2000). An individual differences analysis of ability and strategy influences: Age-related differences in associative learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 359–394.
Schunn, C. D., Reder, L. M., Nhouyvanisvong, A., Richards, D. R., &Stroffolino, P. J. (1997). To calculate or not to calculate: A source activation confusion model of problem familiarity’s role in strategy selection.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 3–29.
Siegler, R. S., &Lemaire, P. (1997). Older and younger adults’ strategy choices in multiplication: Testing predictions of ASCM using the choice/no-choice method.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,126, 71–92.
Siegler, R. S., &Shipley, C. (1995). Variation, selection, and cognitive change. In T. J. Simon & G. S. Halford (Eds.),Developing cognitive competence: New approaches to process modeling (pp. 31–76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Strayer, D. L., &Kramer, A. F. (1994). Aging and skill acquisition: Learning-performance distinctions.Psychology & Aging,9, 589–605.
Thurstone, L. L., &Thurstone, T. G. (1949).Examiner manual for the SRA Primary Mental Abilities Test (Form 10–14). Chicago: Science Research Associates.
Touron, D. R., &Hertzog, C. (2004). Distinguishing age differences in knowledge, strategy use, and confidence during strategic skill acquisition.Psychology & Aging,19, 452–466.
Touron, D. R., Hoyer, W. J., &Cerella, J. (2004). Cognitive skill learning: Age-related strategy shifts and speed of component operations.Psychology & Aging,19, 565–580.
Wechsler, D. (1981).Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.
Woltz, D. J., Gardner, M. K., &Bell, B. G. (2000). Negative transfer errors in sequential cognitive skills: Strong but wrong sequence application.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 601–625.
Zacks, R. T., &Hasher, L. (1982). Automatic encoding of event frequency: Further findings.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,8, 106–116.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by Research Grant AG11451 from the National Institute on Aging.
Note–This article was accepted by the previous editorial team, when Colin M. MacLeod was Editor.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Onyper, S.V., Hoyer, W.J. & Cerella, J. Determinants of retrieval solutions during cognitive skill training: Source confusions. Memory & Cognition 34, 538–549 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193577
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193577