Abstract
Recent evidence indicates that in intermixed recognition testing of different stimulus classes, people can apply different decision criteria (acriterion shift) to stimulus classes distinguished by the study-test delay (Singer, Gagnon, & Richards, 2002), but not by a conspicuous strength manipulation (Stretch & Wixted, 1998b). In an attempt to reconcile these differences, we applied Singer et al.’s text retrieval method to word recognition. People first studied blocked items from each of five categories. After a delay, five new category lists were presented. After each one, the participants recognized intermixed targets and distractors from the current category and one of the earlier ones. At delays of up to 40 min, the answering criteria for immediate and delayed categories were indistinguishable. At delays of 2 days, in contrast, however, bothyes—no and confidence-rating data indicated that more lenient criteria were applied to delayed than to immediate test items. This suggests that people can use the delay between study and test to flexibly adjust the decision criteria of word recognition.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Banks, W. P. (1970). Signal-detection theory and human memory.Psychological Review,74, 81–99.
Battig., W. F., & Montague, W. E. (1969). Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms.Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs,80(3, Pt. 2).
Brown, J., Lewis, V. J., &Monk, A. F. (1977). Memorability, word frequency, and negative recognition.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,29, 461–473.
Gillund, G., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall.Psychological Review,91, 1–67.
Glanzer, M., Adams, J. K., Iverson, G. J., &Kim, K. (1993). The regularities of recognition memory.Psychological Review,100, 546–567.
Glanzer, M., Kim, K., Hilford, A., &Adams, J. K. (1999). Slope of the receiver-operating characteristic in recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 500–513.
Green, D. M., &Swets, J. A. (1966).Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
Hasher, L., &Griffin, M. (1978). Reconstructive and reproductive processes in memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,4, 318–330.
Hicks, J. L., &Marsh, R. L. (1998). A decrement-to-familiarity interpretation of the revelation effect from forced-choice tests of recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 1105–1120.
Hirshman, E. (1995). Decision processes in recognition memory: Criterion shifts and the list strength effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 302–313.
Hirshman, E., &Arndt, J. (1997). Discriminating alternative conceptions of false recognition: The cases of word concreteness and word frequency.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 1306–1323.
Hockley, W. E., &Niewiadomski, M. W. (2001). Interrupting recognition memory: Tests of a criterion-change account of the revelation effect.Memory & Cognition,29, 1176–1184.
Kintsch, W., Welsch, D., Schmalhofer, F., &Zimny, S. (1990). Sentence memory: A theoretical analysis.Journal of Memory & Language,29, 133–159.
Lorch, R. F., Jr. (1981). Effects of relation strength and semantic overlap on retrieval and comparison processes during sentence verification.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,20, 593–611.
Macmillan, N. A., &Creelman, C. D. (1991).Detection theory: A user’s guide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
McNamara, T. P., &Diwadkar, V. A. (1996). The context of memory retrieval.Journal of Memory & Language,35, 877–892.
McNicol, D. (1972).A primer of signal detection theory. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
Mensink, G.-J., &Raaijmakers, J. G. W. (1988). A model for interference and forgetting.Psychological Review,95, 434–455.
Morrell, H. E. R., Gaitan, S., &Wixted, J. T. (2002). On the nature of the decision axis in signal-detection-based models of recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 1095–1110.
Parks, T. E. (1966). Signal-detectability theory of recognition-memory performance.Psychological Review,73, 44–58.
Ratcliff, R., Sheu, C.-F., &Gronlund, S. D. (1992). Testing global memory models using ROC curves.Psychological Review,99, 518–535.
Reder, L. M. (1982). Plausibility judgements versus fact retrieval: Alternative strategies for sentence verification.Psychological Review,89, 250–280.
Reder, L. M. (1987). Strategy-selection in question answering.Cognitive Psychology,19, 90–134.
Reder, L. M. (1988). Strategic control of retrieval strategies. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 22, pp. 227–259). San Diego: Academic Press.
Reder, L. M., &Schunn, C. D. (1996). Metacognition does not imply awareness: Strategy choice is governed by implicit learning and memory. In L. M. Reder (Ed.),Implicit memory and metacognition (pp. 45–77). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Reder, L. M., &Wible, C. (1984). Strategy use in question- answering: Memory strength and task constraints on fan effects.Memory & Cognition,12, 411–419.
Roediger, H. L., III, &McDermott, K. B. (1999). False alarms about false memories.Psychological Review,106, 406–410.
Shiffrin, R. M., Huber, D. E., &Marinelli, K. (1995). Effects of category length and strength on familiarity in recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 267–287.
Shiffrin, R. M., &Steyvers, M. (1997). A model for recognition memory: REM-retrieving effectively from memory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 145–166.
Singer, M. (1979). Temporal locus of inference in the comprehension of brief passages: Recognizing and verifying implications about instruments.Perceptual & Motor Skills,49, 539–550.
Singer, M. (1991). Question-answering strategies and conceptual knowledge.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,29, 143–146.
Singer, M., Gagnon, N., &Richards, E. (2002). Question answering strategy: The effect of mixing test delays.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,56, 41–57.
Stretch, V., &Wixted, J. T. (1998a). Decision rules for recognition memory confidence judgments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 1397–1410.
Stretch, V., &Wixted, J. T. (1998b). On the difference between strength-based and frequency-based mirror effects in recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 1379–1396.
Treisman, M., &Williams, T. C. (1984). A theory of criterion setting with an application to sequential dependencies.Psychological Review,91, 68–111.
Tulving, E., &Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory.Psychological Review,80, 359–380.
van Dijk, T. A., &Kintsch, W. (1983).Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
Wixted, J. T., &Gaitan, S. C. (2002). Cognitive theories as reinforcement history surrogates: The case of likelihood ratio models of human recognition memory.Animal Learning & Behavior,30, 289–305.
Wixted, J. T., &Stretch, V. (2000). The case against a criterion shift account of false memory.Psychological Review,107, 368–376.
Wixted, J. T., &Stretch, V. (2004). In defense of the signal detection interpretation of remember/know judgments.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,11, 616–641.
Yonelinas, A. P. (1994). Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 1341–1354.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Singer, M., Wixted, J.T. Effect of delay on recognition decisions: Evidence for a criterion shift. Memory & Cognition 34, 125–137 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193392
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193392