Abstract
We report the results of four experiments in which we explored the flexibility and fallibility of associative recognition memory. In each experiment, pairs were studied one or more times, and the task was to discriminate intact from rearranged pairs. The critical findings are that the pattern of false alarm rates was dependent on the nature of the recognition procedure (e.g., ratings vs.yes-no) and the situation in which the task was performed. The specific pattern of findings suggest that subjects adopt different recognition strategies in order to achieve a desired level of performance in the most efficient manner possible by varying the degree to which they base their decisions on familiarity versus recollected information. Implications for theories of recognition memory are discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anderson, R. C., &Watts, G. H. (1971). Response competition in the forgetting of paired associates.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,10, 29–34.
Atkinson, R. C., &Juola, J. F. (1974). Search and decision processes in recognition memory. In D. H. Krantz, R. C. Atkinson, R. D. Luce, & P. Suppes (Eds.),Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology: Vol. 1. Learning, memory, and thinking (pp. 243–293). San Francisco: Freeman.
Atkinson, R. C., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed systems and its control processes. In G. H. Bower & J. T. Spence (Eds.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 2, pp. 89–195). New York: Academic Press.
Baranski, J. V., &Petrusic, W. M. (1998). Probing the locus of confidence judgments: Experiments on the time to determine confidence.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 929–945.
Clark, S. E., &Gronlund, S. D. (1996). Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,3, 37–60.
Cleary, A. M., Curran, T., &Greene, R. L. (2001). Memory for detail in item versus associative recognition.Memory & Cognition,29, 413–423.
Criss, A. H., &Shiffrin, R. M. (2004). Pairs do not suffer interference from other types of pairs or single items in associative recognition.Memory & Cognition,32, 1284–1297.
Diller, D. E., Nobel, P. A., &Shiffrin, R. M. (2001). An ARC-REM model for accuracy and response time in recognition and recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 414–435.
Donaldson, W. (1996). The role of decision processes in remembering and knowing.Memory & Cognition,24, 523–533.
Dosher, B. A. (1984). Discriminating preexperimental (semantic) from learned (episodic) associations: A speed-accuracy study.Cognitive Psychology,16, 519–555.
Dunn, J. C. (2004). Remember-know: A matter of confidence.Psychological Review,111, 524–542.
Green, D. M., &Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
Gronlund, S. D., &Ratcliff, R. (1989). Time course of item and associative information: Implications for global memory models.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 846–858.
Hockley, W. E. (1992). Item versus associative information: Further comparisons of forgetting rates.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 1321–1330.
Joordens, S., &Hockley, W. E. (2000). Recollection and familiarity through the looking glass: When old does not mirror new.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 1534–1555.
Kelley, R., &Wixted, J. T. (2001). On the nature of associative information in recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 701–722.
Malmberg, K. J., Holden, J. E., &Shiffrin, R. M. (2004). Modeling the effects of repetitions, similarity, and normative word frequency on old-new recognition and judgments of frequency.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,30, 319–331.
Malmberg, K. J., &Shiffrin, R. M. (2005). The “one-shot” hypothesis for context storage.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,31, 322–336.
Malmberg, K. J., Zeelenberg, R., &Shiffrin, R.M. (2004). Turning up the noise or turning down the volume? On the nature of the impairment of episodic recognition memory by midazolam.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,30, 540–549.
Murdock, B. B. (1982). A theory for the storage and retrieval of item and associative information.Psychological Review,89, 609–626.
Murdock, B. B. (1997). Context and mediators in a theory of distributed associative memory (TODAM2).Psychological Review,104, 839–862.
Nelson, T. O., &Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 26, pp. 125–169). San Diego: Academic Press.
Postman, L., &Stark, K. (1969). Role of response availability in transfer and interference.Journal of Experimental Psychology,79, 168–177.
Raaijmakers, J. G. W., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1980). SAM: A theory of probabilistic search of associative memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 14, pp. 207–262). New York: Academic Press.
Reder, L. M., Nhouyvanisvong, A., Schunn, C. D., Ayers, M. S., Angstadt, P., &Hiraki, K. (2000). A mechanistic account of the mirror effect for word frequency: A computational model of remember-know judgments in a continuous recognition paradigm.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 294–320.
Rottelo, C. M., Macmillan, N. A., &Van Tessel, G. (2000). Recallto-reject in recognition: Evidence from ROC curves.Journal of Memory & Language,43, 67–88.
Shiffrin, R. M., &Steyvers, M. (1997). A model for recognition memory: REM—retrieving effectively from memory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 145–166.
Shiffrin, R. M., &Steyvers, M. (1998). The effectiveness of retrieval from memory. In M. Oaksford & N. Chater (Eds.).Rational models of cogniton (pp. 73–95). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Van Zandt, T., &Maldonado-Molina, M. M. (2004). Response reversals in recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,30, 1147–1166.
Wixted, J. T., &Stretch, V. (2004). In defense of the signal detection interpretation of remember/know judgments.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,11, 616–641.
Xu, J., &Malmberg, K. J. (2007). Modeling the effects of verbal and nonverbal pair strength on associative recognition.Memory & Cognition,35, 526–544.
Yonelinas, A. P. (1997). Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: The contribution of recollection and familiarity.Memory & Cognition,25, 747–763.
Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research.Journal of Memory & Language,46, 441–517.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Portions of this research were presented at the 30th Annual Interdisciplinary Conference in Teton Village, Wyoming, and the 3rd Annual Context and Episodic Memory Symposium in Philadelphia.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Malmberg, K.J., Xu, J. On the flexibility and the fallibility of associative memory. Memory & Cognition 35, 545–556 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193293
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193293