Abstract
Subtyping occurs when atypical examples are excluded from consideration in judging a category. In three experiments, we investigated whether subtyping can influence category learning. In each experiment, participants learned about a category where most, but not all, of the exemplars corresponded to a theme. The category structure included asubtyping dimension, which had one value for theme-congruent exemplars and another for exception exemplars. On the basis of work by Hayes, Foster, and Gadd (2003) and studies on social stereotyping, we hypothesized that this subtyping dimension would enable the participants to discount the exception exemplars, thereby facilitating category learning. Contrary to expectations, we did not find a subtyping effect with traditional category-learning procedures. By introducing the theme prior to learning, however, we observed increased effects on typicality ratings (Experiment 1) and facilitated learning of the category (Experiment 2). Experiment 3 provided direct evidence that introducing the theme prior to learning enhanced the subtyping effect and provided support for a knowledge-gating explanation of subtyping. We conclude that subtyping effects are strongest on already-learned concepts and that subtyping is unlikely to aid in the learning of new concepts, except in particular circumstances.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Refe rences
Chinn, C. A., &Brewer, W. F. (2001). Models of data: A theory of how people evaluate data.Cognition & Instruction,19, 323–393.
Chin-Parker, S., &Ross, B. H. (2002). The effect of category learning on sensitivity to within-category correlations.Memory & Cognition,30, 353–362.
Erickson, M. A., &Kruschke, J. K. (1998). Rules and exemplars in category learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,127, 107–140.
Hayes, B. K., Foster, K., &Gadd, N. (2003). Prior knowledge and subtyping effects in children’s category learning.Cognition,88, 171–199.
Heit, E. (1994). Models of the effects of prior knowledge on category learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 1264–1282.
Heit, E., &Bott, L. (2000). Knowledge selection in category learning. In D. L. Medin (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 39, pp. 163–199). San Diego: Academic Press.
Heit, E., Briggs, J., &Bott, L. (2004). Modeling the effects of prior knowledge on learning incongruent features of category members.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,30, 1065–1081.
Hewstone, M., &Hamberger, J. (2000). Perceived variability and stereotype change.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,36, 103–124.
Hewstone, M., Hassebrauck, M., Wirth, A., &Waenke, M. (2000). Pattern of disconfirming information and processing instructions as determinants of stereotype change.British Journal of Social Psychology,39, 399–411.
Hilton, J. L., &von Hippel, W. (1996). Stereotypes.Annual Review of Psychology,47, 237–271.
Kalish, M. L., Lewandowsky, S., &Kruschke, J. K. (2004). Population of linear experts: Knowledge partitioning and function learning.Psychological Review,111, 1072–1099.
Kaplan, A. S., &Murphy, G. L. (1999). The acquisition of category structure in unsupervised learning.Memory & Cognition,27, 699–712.
Kaplan, A. S., &Murphy, G. L. (2000). Category learning with minimal prior knowledge.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 829–846.
Keil, F. C., &Wilson, R. A. (Eds.) (2000).Explanation and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kruschke, J. K. (1992). ALCOVE: An exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning.Psychological Review,99, 22–44.
Kruschke, J. K. (1996). Base rates in category learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 3–26.
Kunda, Z., &Oleson, K. C. (1995). Maintaining stereotypes in the face of disconfirmation: Constructing grounds for subtyping deviants.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,68, 565–579.
Lewandowsky, S., Kalish, M., &Ngang, S. K. (2002). Simplified learning in complex situations: Knowledge partitioning in function learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,131, 163–193.
Markman, A. B., &Ross, B. H. (2003). Category use and category learning.Psychological Bulletin,129, 592–613.
Murphy, G. L., &Allopenna, P. D. (1994). The locus of knowledge effects in concept learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 904–919.
Murphy, G. L., &Kaplan, A. S. (2000). Feature distribution and background knowledge in category learning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,53A, 962–982.
Murphy, G. L., &Wisniewski, E. J. (1989). Feature correlations in conceptual representations. In G. Tiberghien (Ed.),Advances in cognitive science: Vol. 2. Theory and applications (pp. 23–45). Chichester, U.K.: Ellis Horwood.
Nosofsky, R. M., Palmeri, T. J., &McKinley, S. C. (1994). Ruleplus-exception model of classification learning.Psychological Review,101, 53–79.
Rehder, B., &Murphy, G. L. (2003). A knowledge-resonance (KRES) model of category learning.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,10, 759–784.
Rozenblit, L., &Keil, F. [C.] (2002). The misunderstood limits of folk science: An illusion of explanatory depth.Cognitive Science,26, 521–562.
Rumelhart, D. E., McClelland, J. L., & the PDP Research Group (1986).Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (Vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Smith, J. D., &Minda, J. P. (1998). Prototypes in the mist: The early epochs of category learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 1411–1436.
Stephan, W. G. (1985). Intergroup relations. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.),Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 599–658). New York: Random House.
Yang, L.-X., &Lewandowsky, S. (2003). Context-gated knowledge partitioning in categorization.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,29, 663–679.
Yang, L.-X., &Lewandowsky, S. (2004). Knowledge partitioning in categorization: Constraints on exemplar models.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,30, 1045–1064.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Support for this work came from NIMH Grant MH41704. The authors are grateful to Robyn Kim for collecting data and to Evan Heit and two reviewers for helpful comments on a draft.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bott, L., Murphy, G.L. Subtyping as a knowledge preservation strategy in category learning. Memory & Cognition 35, 432–443 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193283
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193283