Abstract
This article reports three experiments in which the representational nature of human object location memory was studied. The results show that multiple frames of reference can be used to encode the spatial relationships among objects. Depending on their dominancy, availability, and validity, these multiple representations interact to determine memory performance. Specifically, representations that are automatically encoded and extensively practiced are more dominant, and their availability improves performance when they are valid. On the other hand, when the dominant representations are available but invalid, people may have to resort to the less dominant representations. As a result, the availability of these dominant but invalid representations can actually hurt performance, due to interference. If these interfering representations are eliminated, the performance is again improved. The implications of these findings for general human spatial cognition are discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Brewer, B., &Pears, J. (1993). Frames of reference. In R. Eilan, R. McCarthy, & B. Brewer (Eds.),Spatial representation: Problems in philosophy and psychology (pp. 25–30). Oxford: Blackwell.
Burgess, N., Jeffery, K. J., &O’Keefe, J. (Eds.) (1999a).The hippocampal and parietal foundations of spatial cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.
Burgess, N., Jeffery, K. J., &O’Keefe, J. (1999b). Integrating hippocampal and parietal functions: A spatial point of view. In N. Burgess, K. J. Jeffery, & J. O’Keefe (Eds.),The hippocampal and parietal foundations of spatial cognition (pp. 3–29). New York: Oxford University Press.
Colby, C. L., &Goldberg, M. E. (1999). Space and attention in parietal cortex.Annual Review of Neuroscience,22, 319–349.
Diwadkar, V. A., &McNamara, T. P. (1997). Viewpoint dependence in scene recognition.Psychological Science,8, 302–305.
Driver, J., &Pouget, A. (2000). Object-centered visual neglect, or relative egocentric neglect?Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,12, 542–545.
Easton, R. D., &Sholl, M. J. (1995). Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 483–500.
Egeth, H. E., &Yantis, S. (1997). Visual attention: Control, representation, and time course.Annual Review of Psychology,48, 269–297.
Franklin, N., Tversky, B., &Coon, V. (1992). Switching points of view in spatial mental models.Memory & Cognition,20, 507–518.
Gallistel, C. R. (1990).The organization of learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Garnham, A. (1989). A unified theory of the meaning of some spatial relational terms.Cognition,31, 45–60.
Halligan, P. W., Fink, G. R., Marshall, J. C., &Vallar, G. (2003). Spatial cognition: Evidence from visual neglect.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,7, 125–133.
Itti, L., &Koch, C. (2001). Computational modeling of visual attention.Nature Reviews,2, 194–203.
Johnsrude, I., Owen, A. M., Crane, J., Milner, B., &Evans, A. C. (1999). A cognitive activation study of memory for spatial relationships.Neuropsychologia,37, 829–841.
Keppel, G. (1991).Design and analysis: A researcher’s handbook (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
King, J. A., Burgess, N., Hartley, T., Vargha-Khadem, F., &O’Keefe, J. (2002). Human hippocampus and viewpoint dependence in spatial memory.Hippocampus,12, 811–822.
Klatzky, R. L. (1998). Allocentric and egocentric spatial representations: Definitions, distinctions, and interconnections. In C. Freksa, C. Habel, & K. F. Wender (Eds.),Spatial cognition: An interdisciplinary approach to representing and processing spatial knowledge (pp. 1–17). New York: Springer.
Lansdale, M. W. (1998). Modeling memory for absolute location.Psychological Review,105, 351–378.
Levinson, S. C. (1996). Frames of reference and Molyneux’s question: Crosslinguistic evidence. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. Garrett (Eds.),Language and space (pp. 109–169). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Logan, G. D., &Sadler, D. D. (1996). A computational analysis of the apprehension of spatial relations. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. Garrett (Eds.),Language and space (pp. 493–529). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Luck, S. J., Woodman, G. F., &Vogel, E. K. (2000). Event-related potential studies of attention.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,4, 432–440.
McNamara, T. P. (2003). How are the locations of objects in the environment represented in memory? In C. Freksa, W. Brauer, C. Habel, & K. Wender (Eds.),Spatial cognition III: Routes and navigation, human memory and learning, spatial representation and spatial reasoning (pp. 174–191). Berlin: Springer.
Milner, B., Johnsrude, I., &Crane, J. (1997). Right medial temporal lobe contribution to object-location memory.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B,352, 1469–1474.
Mou, W., &McNamara, T. P. (2002). Intrinsic frames of reference in spatial memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 162–170.
Naveh-Benjamin, M. (1987). Coding of spatial location information: An automatic process?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 595–605.
Naveh-Benjamin, M. (1988). Recognition memory of spatial location information: Another failure to support automaticity.Memory & Cognition,16, 437–445.
Newcombe, N. S. (2002). Spatial cognition. In C. R. Gallistel (Ed.),Stevens’ Handbook of experimental psychology: Vol. 2. Memory and cognitive processes (3rd ed., pp. 113–163). New York: Wiley.
Newcombe, N. S., &Huttenlocher, J. (2000).Making space: The development of spatial representation and reasoning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
O’Keefe, J. (1993). Kant and the sea-horse. In N. Eilan, B. Brewer, & R. McCarthy (Eds.),Spatial representation: Problems in philosophy and psychology (pp. 43–64). Oxford: Blackwell.
O’Keefe, J. (1996). The spatial prepositions in English, vector grammar, and the cognitive map theory. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. Garrett (Eds.),Language and space (pp. 277–316). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
O’Keefe, J., &Nadel, L. (1978).The hippocampus as a cognitive map. New York: Oxford University Press.
Owen, A. M., Milner, B., Petrides, M., &Evans, A. C. (1996). A specific role for the right parahippocampal gyrus in the retrieval of object-location: A positron emission tomography study.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,8, 588–602.
Palmer, B. (2003). Linguistic frame of reference reconsidered. In P. Collins & M. Amberber (Eds.),Proceedings of the 2002 Conference of the Australian Linguistics Society. Available at www.als.asn.au.
Redish, A. D. (1999).Beyond the cognitive map: From place cells to episodic memory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Shelton, A. L., &McNamara, T. P. (1997). Multiple views of spatial memory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 102–106.
Sholl, M. J., &Bartels, G. P. (2002). The role of self to object updating in orientation-free performance on spatial-memory tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 422–436.
Sholl, M. J., &Nolin, T. L. (1997). Orientation specificity in representations of place.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 1494–1507.
Snodgrass, J. G., &Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,6, 174–215.
Sun, Y., Wang, H., &Johnson, T. R. (2004). Spatial updating in intrinsic frames of reference. In K. Forbus, D. Gentner, & T. Regier (Eds.),Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1285–1290). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Talmy, L. (1983). How languages structure space. In H. Pick & L. Acredolo (Eds.),Spatial orientation: Theory, research and application (pp. 225-282). New York: Plenum.
Theios, J., &Amrhein, P. C. (1989). Theoretical analysis of the cognitive processing of lexical and pictorial stimuli: Reading, naming, and visual and conceptual comparisons.Psychological Review,96, 5–24.
Tolman, E. C. (1948). Cognitive maps in rats and men.Psychological Review,55, 189–208.
Tversky, B. (1996). Spatial perspective in descriptions. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. Garrett (Eds.),Language and space (pp. 463–492). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Tversky, B. (2000). Remembering spaces. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.),The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 363–378). New York: Oxford University Press.
Valiquette, C. M., McNamara, T. P., &Smith, K. (2003). Locomotion, incidental learning, and the selection of spatial reference systems.Memory & Cognition,31, 479–489.
Waller, D., Montellob, D. R., Richardson, A. E., &Hegartya, M. (2002). Orientation specificity and spatial updating of memories for layouts.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 1051–1063.
Wang, H., Johnson, T. R., &Zhang, J. (2001).The mind’s views of space. In L. Chen & Y. Zuo (Eds.),Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference of Cognitive Science (pp. 191–198). Beijing: University of Science & Technology of China Press.
Wang, R. F., &Simons, D. J. (1999). Active and passive scene recognition across views.Cognition,70, 191–210.
Wang, R. F., &Spelke, E. S. (2000). Updating egocentric representations in human navigation.Cognition,77, 215–250.
Wang, R. F., &Spelke, E. S. (2002). Human spatial representation: Insights from animals.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,6, 376–382.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant N00014-01-1-0074 from the Office of Naval Research Cognitive Science Program.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, H., Johnson, T.R., Sun, Y. et al. Object location memory: The interplay of multiple representations. Memory & Cognition 33, 1147–1159 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193219
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193219