Abstract
In the present study, orthographic metrics for Greek children’s Grade 1 and Grade 2 reading materials were presented. Data for five transparency metrics—three of which being neither feedforward nor feedbackward— were presented and offered for use in the research of children’s reading and spelling acquisition. The analysis demonstrated the complex relationships between metrics and compared the results with those obtained for the English language. The structure of these metrics from a variety of corpus sizes was investigated, and we concluded that large corpus sizes do not necessarily make a substantial contribution to the value of such metrics when compared with smaller samples.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berndt, R. S., Reggia, J. A., & Mitchum, C. C. (1987). Empirically derived probabilities for grapheme-to-phoneme correspondences in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 19, 1–9.
Carney, E. (1994). A survey of English spelling. London: Routledge.
Chliounaki, K., & Bryant, P. (2002). Construction and learning to spell. Cognitive Development, 17, 1489–1499.
Coltheart, M. (2006). Dual route and connectionist models of reading: An overview. London Review of Education, 4, 5–17.
Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589–608.
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204–256.
Cossu, G., Gugliotta, M., & Marshall, J. (1995). Acquisition of reading and written spelling in a transparent orthography: Two nonparallel processes? Reading & Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 7, 9–22.
Ellis, N. C., Natsume, M., Stavropoulou, K., Hoxhallari, L., van Daal, V. H. P., Polyzoe, N., et al. (2004). The effects of orthographic depth on learning to read alphabetic, syllabic, and logographic scripts. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 438–460.
Frith, U., Wimmer, H., & Landerl, K. (1998). Differences in phonological recoding in German- and English-speaking children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 31–54.
Gontijo, P. F. D., Gontijo, I., & Shillcock, R. (2003). Grapheme-phoneme probabilities in British English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 136–157.
Hanna, P. R., Hanna, J. S., & Hodges, R. E. (1966). Phoneme-grapheme correspondences as cues to spelling improvement. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Hatzigeorgiou, N., Gavrilidou, M., Piperidis, S., Karayannis, G., Papakostopoulou, A., Spiliotopoulou, A., et al. (2000). Design and implementation of the online ILSP Greek corpus. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (Vol. 3, pp. 1737–1740). Athens, Greece: LREC.
Hatzigeorgiou, N., Mikros, G., & Karayiannis, G. (2001). Word length, word frequencies and Zipf’s law in the Greek language. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 8, 175–185.
Karantzola, E., Kurdi, K., Spanelli, T., & Tsiagkani, T. (2008). Glossa a’dimotikou (Vols. 1 and 2). Athens, Greece: OEDB.
Katz, L., & Frost, R. (1992). The reading process is different for different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 67–84). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Ktori, M., van Heuven, W. J. B., & Pitchford, N. J. (2008). GreekLex: A lexical database of modern Greek. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 773–783.
Landerl, K., Wimmer, H., & Frith, U. (1997). The impact of orthographic consistency on dyslexia: A German-English comparison. Cognition, 63, 315–334.
Loizidou-Ieridou, N. (2007). Literacy development and reading difficulties in Greek-speaking Cypriot children aged between 6 and 11 years. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Essex.
Loizidou-Ieridou, N., Masterson, J., & Hanley, R. (2009). Spelling development in 6–11 year old Greek-speaking Cypriot children. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Martindale, C., Gusein-Zade, S. M., McKenzie, D., & Borodovsky, M. Y. (1996). Comparison of equations describing the ranked frequency distributions of graphemes and phonemes. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 3, 106–112.
Masterson, J., Stuart, M., Dixon, M., & Lovejoy, S. (2003). Children’s printed word database (Economic and social research council project R00023406). Retrieved September 28, 2007, from www .essex.ac.uk/psychology/cpwd/.
McGuinness, D. (1998). Why children can’t read: And what we can do about it. London: Penguin.
Mikros, G., Hatzigeorgiou, N., & Karayiannis, G. (2005). Basic quantitative characteristics of the modern Greek language using the Hellenic National Corpus. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 12, 167–184.
Oney, B., & Goldman, S. (1984). Decoding and comprehension skills in Turkish and English: Effects of regularity of grapheme-phoneme correspondences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 557–568.
Paulesu, E., McCrory, E., Fazio, F., Menoncello, L., Brunswick, N., Cappa, S. F., et al. (2000). A cultural effect on brain function. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 91–96.
Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2007). Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: The CDP1 model of reading aloud. Psychological Review, 114, 273–315.
Plaut, D. C. (1999). A connectionist approach to word reading and acquired dyslexia: Extension to sequential processing. Cognitive Science, 23, 543–568.
Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56–115.
Porpodas, C. D. (1999). Patterns of phonological and memory processing in beginning readers and spellers of Greek. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 406–416.
Porpodas, C. D. (2006). Literacy acquisition in Greek: Research review of the role of phonological and cognitive factors. In R. M. Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 189–199). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Protopapas, A., & Vlahou, E. (2009). A comparative quantitative analysis of Greek orthographic transparency. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 991–1008.
Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523–568.
Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143–174.
Spencer, K. A. (2007). Predicting children’s word-spelling difficulty for common English words from measures of orthographic transparency, phonemic and graphemic length and word frequency. British Journal of Psychology, 98, 305–338.
Spencer, K. A. (2009). Feedforward, -backward, and neutral transparency measures for British English. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 220–227. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.1.220
Spencer, L. H., & Hanley, J. R. (2003). Effects of orthographic transparency on reading and phoneme awareness in children learning to read in Wales. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 1–28.
Treiman, R., Mullennix, J., Bijeljac-Babic, R., & Richmond-Welty, E. D. (1995). The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 107–136.
Venezky, R. L. (1967). English orthography: Its graphical structure and its relation to sound. Reading Research Quarterly, 2, 75–106.
Ziegler, J. C., Jacobs, A. M., & Stone, G. O. (1996). Statistical analysis of the bidirectional inconsistency of spelling and sound in French. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 504–515.
Ziegler, J. C., Stone, G. O., & Jacobs, A. M. (1997). What is the pronunciation for -ough and the spelling for /u/? A database for computing feedforward and feedback consistency in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 29, 600–618.
Zipf, G. K. (1936). The psycho-biology of language: An introduction to dynamic psychology. London: Routledge.
Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least effort: An introduction to human ecology. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Spencer, K.A., Loizidou, N. & Terson, J.M. Feedforward, -backward, and neutral transparency measures for Grade 1 and Grade 2 Greek readers. Behavior Research Methods 42, 96–108 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.1.96
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.1.96