Abstract
Without relevant visual cues, the subjective visual vertical (SVV) is biased in roll-tilted subjects toward the body axis (Aubert or A-effect). This study focused on the role of the somatosensory system with respect to the SVV and on whether somesthetic cues act through the estimated body tilt. The body cast technology was used to obtain a diffuse tactile stimulation. An increased A-effect was expected because of a greater underestimation of the body position in the body cast. Sixteen subjects placed in a tilt chair were rolled sideways from 0° to 105°. They were asked to verbally indicate their subjective body position and then to adjust a luminous line to the vertical under strapped and body cast conditions. Results showed a greater A-effect (p<.001) but an overestimation of the body orientation (p<.01) in the body cast condition for the higher tilt values (beyond 60°). Since the otolith organs produced the same gravity response in both conditions, errors were due to a change in somesthetic cues. Visual and postural errors were not directly related (no correlation). However, the angular distance between the apparent body position and the SVV remained stable, suggesting that the change in somatosensory pattern inputs has a similar impact on the cognitive processes involved in assessing the perception of external space and the sense of self-position.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anastasopoulos, D., Bronstein, A., Haslwanter, T., Fetter, M., &Dichgans, J. (1999). The role of somatosensory input for the perception of verticality. In B. Cohen & B. J. M. Hess (Eds.),Otolith function in spatial orientation and movement (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 871, pp. 379–383). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
Bauermeister, M. (1978). Differences between right versus left lateral body tilt in its effect on the visual and tactual perception.Psychological Research,40, 183–187.
Bringoux, L., Nougier, V., Barraud, P.A., Marin, L., & Raphel, C. (in press). Contribution of somaesthetic information to the perception of body orientation in the pitch dimension.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.
Bronstein, A. M. (1999). The interaction of otolith and proprioceptive information in the perception of verticality: The effects of labyrinthine and CNS disease. In B. Cohen & B. J. M. Hess (Eds.),Otolith function in spatial orientation and movement (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 871, pp. 324–333). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
Brown, J. L. (1961). Orientation to the vertical during water immersion.Aerospace Medicine,32, 209–217.
Day, R. H., &Wade, N. J. (1969). Mechanisms involved in visual orientation constancy.Psychological Bulletin,71, 33–42.
Dietz, V., Gollhofer, A., Kleiber, M., &Trippel, M. (1992). Regulation of bipedal stance: Dependence on “load” receptors.Experimental Brain Research,89, 229–231.
Higashiyama, A., &Koga, K. (1998). Apparent body tilt and postural aftereffect.Perception & Psychophysics,60, 331–347.
Howard, I. P. (1986). The perception of posture, self motion, and the visual vertical. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufmann, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.),Handbook of perception and human performance (Vol. 1, 18-1 to 18-62). New York: Wiley.
Howard, I. P., &Templeton, W. B. (1966).Human spatial orientation. New York: Wiley.
Ito, Y., &Gresty, M. A. (1997). Subjective postural orientation and visual vertical during slow pitch tilt for the seated human subject.Aviation, Space, & Environmental Medicine,68, 3–12.
Jarchow, T., &Mast, F. W. (1999). The effect of water immersion on postural and visual orientation.Aviation, Space, & Environmental Medicine,70, 879–886.
Lechner-Steinleitner, S., &Schöne, H. (1980). The subjective vertical under “dry” and “wet” conditions at clockwise and counterclockwise changed positions and the effect of a parallel background field.Psychological Research,41, 305–317.
Mast, F. W., &Jarchow, T. (1996). Perceived body position and the visual horizontal.Brain Research Bulletin,40, 393–397.
Mittelstaedt, H. (1983). A new solution to the problem of the subjective vertical.Naturwissenschaften,70, 272–281.
Mittelstaedt, H. (1992). Somatic versus vestibular gravity reception in man. In B. Cohen, D. L. Tomko, & F. E. Guedry (Eds.),Sensing and controlling motion, vestibular and sensorimotor function (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 656, pp. 124–139). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
Mittelstaedt, H. (1997). Interaction of eye-, head-, and trunk-bound information in spatial perception and control.Journal of Vestibular Research,7, 283–302.
Nelson, J. G. (1968). Effect of water immersion and body position upon position of gravitational vertical.Aerospace Medicine,39, 806–811.
Nemire, K., &Cohen, M. M. (1993). Visual and somesthetic influences on postural orientation in the median plane.Perception & Psychophysics,53, 106–116.
Nyborg, H. (1971). Tactile stimulation and perception of the vertical: I. Effect of diffuse vs. specif ic tactile stimulation.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,12, 1–13.
Parker, D. E., Poston, R. L., &Gulledge, W. L. (1983). Spatial orientation: Visual-vestibular-somatic interaction.Perception & Psychophysics,33, 139–146.
Pearson, R. G., &Hauty, G. T. (1959). Adaptive processes determining proprioceptive perception of verticality.Journal of Experimental Psychology,57, 367–371.
Raphan, T., &Sturm, D. (1992). Modeling the spatiotemporal organization of velocity storage in the vestibuloocular reflex by optokinetic studies.Journal of Neurophysiology,66, 1410–1421.
Sandström, C. I. (1954). A note on the Aubert phenomenon.Journal of Experimental Psychology,48, 209–210.
Schöne, H. (1964). On the role of gravity in human spatial orientation.Aerospace Medicine,35, 764–772.
Schöne, H. (1975). The “weight” of the gravity organ’s signal in the control of perceptual and reflex type orientation at different body positions.Fortschritte der Zoologie,23, 274–285.
Schöne, H., &Wade, N. J. (1971). The influence of force magnitude on the perception of body position.British Journal of Psychology,62, 347–352.
Teasdale, N., Nougier, V., Barraud, P. A., Bourdin, C., Debû, B., Poquin, D., &Raphel, C. (1999). Contribution of ankle, knee, and hip joints to the perception threshold for support surface rotation.Perception & Psychophysics,61, 615–624.
Udo de Haes, H. A. (1970). Stability of apparent vertical and ocular countertorsion as a function of lateral tilt.Perception & Psychophysics,8, 137–142.
Van Beuzekom, A. D., Medendorp, W. P., &Van Gisbergen, J. A. M. (2001). The subjective vertical and the sense of self orientation during active body tilt.Vision Research,41, 3229–3242.
Van Beuzekom, A. D., &Van Gisbergen, J. A. M. (2000). Properties of the internal representation of gravity inferred from spatial-direction and body-tilt estimates.Journal of Neurophysiology,84, 11–27.
von Holst, E. (1950). Die Arbeitsweise des Statolithenapparates bei Fischen.Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie,32, 60–120.
Wade, N. J. (1972). Effect of forward head inclination on visual orientation during lateral body tilt.Journal of Experimental Psychology,96, 203–205.
Wade, N. J. (1973). The effect of water immersion on the perception of the visual vertical.British Journal of Psychology,64, 351–361.
Witkin, H. A., &Asch, S. E. (1948). Studies in space orientation: III. Perception of the upright in the absence of a visual field.Journal of Experimental Psychology,38, 603–614.
Yardley, L. (1990). Contribution of somatosensory information to perception of the visual vertical with body tilt and rotating visual field.Perception & Psychophysics,48, 131–134.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Trousselard, M., Cian, C., Nougier, V. et al. Contribution of somesthetic cues to the perception of body orientation and subjective visual vertical. Perception & Psychophysics 65, 1179–1187 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194843
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194843