Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring changes after multidisciplinary rehabilitation of obese individuals

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Endocrinological Investigation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: In 2009, the Italian Society of Obesity developed the short-form questionnaire for Obesity-related Disabilities (TSD-OC). Aims: To stage the degree of disability in obese patients using TSD-OC; to verify its sensitivity to change after rehabilitation. Subjects: Three hundred and fifty-five adult obese individuals [body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m2] undergoing rehabilitation. Exclusion criteria were severe cardiovascular or respiratory diseases, neurological and psychological conditions. Sensitivity to change of TSD-OC was evaluated in 194 patients out of the initial sample. Methods: To define the disability levels according to TSD-OC, the method of interquartile range was applied to the initial sample. The 194 in-patients were assessed with Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, Functional Independence Measure (FIM), Functional Visual Analogue Scale, and TSD-OC before (S0) and after 4 weeks (S1) of intensive (3 h daily) rehabilitation multidisciplinary program. Individuals were grouped according to age (1: age 30–59 yr; 2: age over 60 yr) and degree of obesity (BMI: A, 30–40 kg/m2; B, 40–50 kg/m2). Results: At S1, BMI and all the clinical scores improved significantly in the whole study sample. The younger individuals with higher level of obesity showed a higher functional improvement (−51.3%). In the older subjects, improvement was not statistically different when varying BMI (A2–13.7% vs B2–14.6%). In the whole group, the TSD-OC improvement was statistically greater than the physical FIM gain (−25.9% vs +5.4%, p<0.05). Conclusions: Our data evidenced that the TSD-OC is a sensitive measure of short-term changes in disability status of obese individuals after rehabilitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kim JY, Oh DJ, Yoon TY, Choi JM, Choe BK. The impacts of obesity on psychological well-being: a cross-sectional study about depressive mood and quality of life. J Prev Med Pub Health 2007, 40: 191–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kostka T, Bogus K. Independent contribution of overweight/obesity and physical inactivity to lower health-related quality of life in community-dwelling older subjects. Z Gerontol Geriatr 2007, 40: 43–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lidstone JS, Ells LJ, Finn P, Whittaker VJ, Wilkinson JR, Summerbell CD. Independent associations between weight status and disability in adults: results from the Health Survey for England. Public Health 2006, 120: 412–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. World Health Organization. The global burden of disease: 2004 update. Geneva: WHO, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Peeters A, Bonneux L, Nusselder WJ, De Laet C, Barendregt JJ. Adult obesity and the burden of disability throughout life. Obes Res 2004, 12: 1145–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fortinsky RH, Granger CV, Seltzer GB. The use of functional assessment in understanding home care needs. Med Care 1981, 19: 489–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ropka ME. Symptom status and functional status outcomes: humanistic outcomes in obesity disease management. Obes Res 2002, 10(Suppl 1): 42S–9S.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996, 34: 220–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ware JE. SF-36 health survey update. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000, 25: 3130–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kolotkin RL, Head S, Hamilton M, Tse CK. Assessing Impact of Weight on Quality of Life. Obes Res 1995, 3: 49–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kolotkin RL, Head S, Brookhart A. Construct validity of the Impact of Weight on Quality of Life questionnaire. Obes Res 1997, 5: 434–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kolotkin RL, Crosby RD, Kosloski KD, Williams GR. Development of a brief measure to assess quality of life in obesity. Obes Res 2001, 9: 102–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mannucci E, Ricca V, Barciulli E, et al. Quality of life and overweight: the obesity related well-being (Orwell 97) questionnaire. Addict Behav 1999, 24: 345–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stucki A, Daansen P, Fuessl M, et al. ICF Core sets for obesity. J Rehabil Med 2004, 44 (Suppl): 107–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Raggi A, Brunani A, Sirtori A, et al. Obesity-related disability: key factors identified by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Disabil Rehabil 2010, 32: 2028–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Donini LM, Brunani A, Sirtori A, et al; SIO-ISDCA Task Force. Assessing disability in morbidly obese individuals: the Italian Society of Obesity test for obesity-related disabilities. Disabil Rehabil 2011, 33: 2509–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ministero della Salute. Quaderni del Ministero della Salute. Volume 8. Roma: Istituto Poligrafico e Zecca dello Stato; marzo-aprile 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Donini LM, Cuzzolaro M, Spera G, et al. Obesity and Eating Disorders. Indications for the different levels of care. An Italian Expert Consensus Document. Eat Weight Disord 2010, 15 (Suppl): 1–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yount KM, Hoddinott J, Stein AD. Disability and self-rated health among older women and men in rural Guatemala: the role of obesity and chronic conditions. Soc Sci Med 2010, 71: 1418–27.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Roland M, Fairbank J. The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000, 25: 3115–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hamilton BB, Granger CV, Sherwin FS, et al. A uniform national data system for medical rehabilitation. In: Fuhrer MJ (ed). Rehabilitation Outcomes: analysis and measurement. Baltimore, MD: Brookes. 1987, 137–47.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Houston DK, Stevens J, Cai J, Morey MC. Role of weight history on functional limitations and disability in late adulthood: the ARIC study. Obes Res 2005, 13: 1793–802.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Houston DK, Stevens J, Cai J. Abdominal fat distribution and functional limitations and disability in a biracial cohort: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Int J Obes (Lond) 2005, 29: 1457–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Guallar-Castillón P, Sagardui-Villamor J, Banegas JR, et al. Waist circumference as a predictor of disability among older adults. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2007, 15: 233–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Capodaglio P, Capodaglio EM, Facioli M, Saibene F. Long-term strength training for community-dwelling people over 75: impact on muscle function, functional ability and life style. Eur J Appl Physiol 2007, 100: 535–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ferrucci L, Guralnik JM, Buchner D, et al. Departures from linearity in the relationship between measures of muscular strength and physical performance of the lower extremities: the women’s health and ageing study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 1997, 52: M275–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Buchner DM, de Lateur BJ. The importance of skeletal muscle strength to physical function in older adults. Ann Behav Med 1991, 13: 91–8.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jensen GL, Hsiao PY. Obesity in older adults: relationship to functional limitation. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2010, 13: 46–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Vincent HK, Vincent KR, Lamb KM. Obesity and mobility disability in the older adult. Obesity Rev 2010, 11: 568–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Cimolin PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Precilios, H., Brunani, A., Cimolin, V. et al. Measuring changes after multidisciplinary rehabilitation of obese individuals. J Endocrinol Invest 36, 72–77 (2013). https://doi.org/10.3275/8240

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3275/8240

Key-words

Navigation