Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Defining the appropriate setting for treating obese patients: do we have the right tools?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To allocate obese patients to the correct therapeutic setting, the Italian Obesity Society (SIO) has suggested a new algorithm based on the Edmonton obesity staging system (EOSS). The aim of our study was to apply in two retrospective cohorts of obese patients both the EOSS and the activities of daily life (ADL) scale to identify also their rehabilitation needs.

Methods

288 out-patients and 298 in-patients were recruited. All patients were evaluated with a multidisciplinary approach and the mental, mechanical, and metabolic comorbidities were scored.

Results

The 2 groups differed for gender (28.8% men in out-patients, p = 0.001), age (> 60 years in in-patients, p = 0.03), BMI (40.8 ± 6.3 kg/m2 in in-patients, p < 0.001), and ADL (44.0 ± 16.0 in in-patients, p < 0.001). EOSS distribution was significant different: stages 0 and 1 were more present in out-patients and stages 3 and 4 in in-patients. In both groups, BMI increased significantly in EOSS category [95% CI + 1.4 (+ 0.5; + 2.2) for out-patients and + 1.7 (+ 0.7; + 2.6) for in-patients] and ADL were positively correlated with EOSS [95% CI + 5.0 (+ 2.5; + 7.4) for out-patients and + 9.9 (+ 7.7; + 12.2) for in-patients]. Mean ADL difference between the two groups, adjusted for age (over/under 60 years), BMI category, and EOSS was 24.8 (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

SIO algorithm seems an effective tool for staging obesity in relation to the clinical impairment. To better define the correct rehabilitative allocation of obese patients, we suggest to integrate the SIO algorithm with the ADL score.

Level of evidence

Level III, retrospective case-control analytic study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yumuk V, Tsigos C, Fried M, Schindler K, Busetto L, Micic D, Toplak H, for the Obesity Management Task Force of the European Association for the Study of Obesity (2015) European guidelines for obesity management in adults. Obes Facts 8(6):402–424. https://doi.org/10.1159/000442721

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Standard Italiani per la cura dell’obesità—SIO-ADI 2016–2017

  3. Sharma AM, Kushner RF (2009) A proposed clinical staging system for obesity. Int J Obes 33(3):289–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-789X.2009.00614.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Canning KL, Brown RE, Wharton S, Sharma AM, Kuk JL (2015) Edmonton obesity staging system prevalence and association with weight loss in a publicly funded referral-based obesity clinic. J Obes 2015:619734. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/619734

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Donini LM, Cuzzolaro M, Spera G, Badiali M, Basso N, Bollea MR, Bosello O, Brunani A, Busetto L, Cairella G, Cannella C, Capodaglio P, Carbonelli MG, Castellaneta E, Castra R, Clini E, Contaldo F, Dalla Ragione L, Dalle Grave R, D’Andrea F, Del Balzo V, De Cristofaro P, Di Flaviano E, Fassino S, Ferro AM, Forestieri P, Franzoni E, Gentile MG, Giustini A, Jacoangeli F, Lubrano C, Lucchin L, Manara F, Marangi G, Marcelli M, Marchesini G, Marri G, Marrocco W, Melchionda N, Mezzani B, Migliaccio P, Muratori F, Nizzoli U, Ostuzzi R, Panzolato G, Pasanisi F, Persichetti P, Petroni ML, Pontieri V, Prosperi E, Renna C, Rovera G, Santini F, Saraceni V, Savina C, Scuderi N, Silecchia G, Strollo F, Todisco P, Tubili C, Ugolini G, Zamboni M (2010) Obesity and eating disorders. indications for the different levels of care. An Italian expert consensus document. Eat Weight Disord 15(1–2 Suppl):1–31

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bosello O, Donataccio MP, Cuzzolaro M (2016) Obesity or obesities? Controversies on the association between body mass index and premature mortality. Eat Weight Disord 21(2):165–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-016-0278-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sharma AM (2010) M, M, M and M: a mnemonic for assessing obesity. Obes Rev 11:808–809. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-789X.2010.00766.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Donini LM, Brunani A, Sirtori A, Savina C, Tempera S, Cuzzolaro M, Spera G, Cimolin V, Precilios H, Raggi A, Capodaglio P, the SIO-SISDCA TASK FORCE (2011) Assessing disability in morbidly obese individuals: the Italian Society of Obesity test for obesity-related disabilities. Disabil Rehabil 33(25–26):2509–2518. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2011.575529

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sirtori A, Brunani A, Capodaglio P, Berselli ME, Villa V, Ceriani F, Corti S, Leonardi M, Raggi A, ICF-OBESITY Group (2016) Patients with obesity-related comorbidities have higher disability compared with those without obesity-related comorbidities: results from a cross-sectional study. Int J Rehabil Res 39(1):63–69. https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Vigna LM, Brunani A, Gori F, Mussino F, Tomaino SCM, Agnelli GM, Consonni D, Riboldi L (2018) Edmonton obesity staging system (EOSS) and work ability in the evaluation of workers affected by obesity: a preliminary report. J Occup Environ Med 60(8):732–736. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000001321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chiappetta S, Stier C, Squillante S, Theodoridou S, Weiner RA (2016) The importance of the edmonton obesity staging system in predicting postoperative outcome and 30-day mortality after metabolic surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis 12(10):1847–1855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2016.02.042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors did not receive any form of funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amelia Brunani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human rights statement

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vigna, L., Brunani, A., Agnelli, G.M. et al. Defining the appropriate setting for treating obese patients: do we have the right tools?. Eat Weight Disord 23, 871–876 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-018-0595-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-018-0595-x

Keywords

Navigation