Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative Analysis of Structure and Mechanical Properties of Additive Objects Manufactured by Electron Beam Method and Cold Metal Transfer

  • PHYSICAL METALLURGY AND HEAT TREATMENT
  • Published:
Russian Journal of Non-Ferrous Metals Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nowadays prototyping and additive manufacturing of objects are the most promising trends of development. As opposed to more precise powder methods, particular attention has been given to faster wire techniques, which allow manufacturing of objects without pores. This work compares the influence of two wire techniques, electron beam additive manufacturing and cold metal transfer, on the structure and mechanical properties of AMg5 aluminum alloy. Under optimum printing parameters, the powers of the electron beam and arc were close, however, due to the pulse pattern of the arc, the cold metal transfer was more cost efficient. In addition, the arc technique is carried out in an argon environment, which accelerates cooling of the applied layer. Generally, due to lower heat input and accelerated cooling, the grain structure is refined, which leads to an increase in strength and microhardness. Due to continuous removal from the substrate and an increase in the weight of the object, the heat conditions of application of the next layer vary, which is controlled by a decrease in beam/arc power. That said, each layer is characterized by its thermal history, thus influencing the structure and properties of the material. In particular, the higher the heat amount accepted by a layers from previous layers, the lower its strength. When a certain height is crossed (about 30 mm) the cooling is intensified, due to the higher weight of the object, and the strength increases again. This is the most characteristic for cold metal transfer. However, these oscillations are rather moderate; the mechanical properties along the height are highly stable in both techniques. In addition, in the case of cold metal transfer, burning of alloying magnesium is lower. In general, at present, the cold metal transfer is more cost efficient and allows one to manufacture objects of higher quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Olakanmi, E.O., Cochrane, R.F., and Dalgarno, K.W., A review on selective laser sintering/melting (SLS/SLM) of aluminium alloy powders: Processing, microstructure, and properties, Prog. Mater. Sci., 2015, vol. 74, pp. 401–477.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Körner, C., Additive manufacturing of metallic components by selective electron beam melting—A review, Int. Mater. Rev., 2016, vol. 61, pp. 361–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Herzog, D., Seyda, V., Wycisk, E., and Emmelmann, C., Additive manufacturing of metals, Acta Mater., 2016, vol. 117, pp. 371–392.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gu, D.D., Meiners, W., Wissenbach, K., and Poprawe, R., Laser additive manufacturing of metallic components: Materials, processes and mechanisms, Int. Mater. Rev., 2012, vol. 57, pp. 133–164.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. King, W.E., Anderson, A.T., Ferencz, R.M., Hodge, N.E., Kamath, C., Khairallah, S.A., and Rubenchik, A.M., Laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing of metals; physics, computational, and materials challenges, Appl. Phys. Rev., 2015, vol. 2, article no. 041304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lewandowski, J.J. and Seifi, M., Metal additive manufacturing: A review of mechanical properties, Annu. Rev. Mater. Res., 2016, vol. 46, pp. 151–186.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Collins, P.C., Brice, D.A., Samimi, P., Ghamarian, I., and Fraser, H.L., Microstructural control of additively manufactured metallic materials, Annu. Rev. Mater. Res., 2016, vol. 46, pp. 63–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bourell, D.L., Perspectives on additive manufacturing, Annu. Rev. Mater. Res., 2016, vol. 46, pp. 1–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sames, W.J., List, F.A., Pannala, S., Dehoff, R.R., and Babu, S.S., The metallurgy and processing science of metal additive manufacturing, Int. Mater. Rev., 2016, vol. 61, pp. 315–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shen, C., Pan, Z., Ding, D., Yuan, L., Nie, N., Wang, Y., Luo, D., Cuiuri, D., van Duin, S., and Li, H., The influence of post-production heat treatment on the multi-directional properties of nickel-aluminum bronze alloy fabricated using wire-arc additive manufacturing process, Addit. Manuf., 2018, vol. 23, pp. 411–421.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gushchina, M.O., Klimova-Korsmik, O.G., Vildanov, A.M., Shalnova, S.A., Tataru, A.S., and Norman, E.A., Influence of the protective atmosphere on the structure and properties parts from titanium alloy Ti–6Al–4V produced by direct laser deposition, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 2018, vol. 1109, article no. 012060.

    Google Scholar 

  12. King, W.E., Barth, H.D., Castillo, V.M., Gallegos, G.F., Gibbs, J.W., Hahn, D.E., Kamath, C., and Rubenchik, A.M., Observation of keyhole-mode laser melting in laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2014, vol. 214, pp. 2915–2925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Feng, X., Zhang, Z., Cui, X., Jin, G., Zheng, W., and Liu, H., Additive manufactured closed-cell aluminum alloy foams via laser melting deposition process, Mater. Lett., 2018, vol. 233, pp. 126–129.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ayarkwa, K.F., Williams, S.W., and Ding, J., Assessing the effect of TIG alternating current time cycle on aluminium wire + arc additive manufacture, Addit. Manuf., 2017, vol. 18, pp. 186–193.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Qi, Z., Qi, B., Cong, B., Sun, H., Zhao, G., and Ding, J., Microstructure and mechanical properties of wire + arc additively manufactured 2024 aluminum alloy components: As-deposited and post heat-treated, J. Manuf. Processes, 2019, vol. 40, pp. 27–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ryan, E.M., Sabin, T.J., Watts, J.F., and Whiting, M.J., The influence of build parameters and wire batch on porosity of wire and arc additive manufactured aluminium alloy 2319, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2018, vol. 262, pp. 577–584.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Uddin, S.Z., Murr, L.E., Terrazas, C.A., Morton, P., Roberson, D.A., and Wicker, R.B., Processing and characterization of crack-free aluminum 6061 using high-temperature heating in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing, Addit. Manuf., 2018, vol. 22, pp. 405–415.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hallmann, S., Wolny, T., and Emmelmann, C., Post-processing of additively manufactured cutting edges by laser ablation, Procedia CIRP, 2018, vol. 74, pp. 276–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cong, B., Ding, J., and Williams, S., Effect of arc mode in cold metal transfer process on porosity of additively manufactured Al-6.3%Cu alloy, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2015, vol. 76, pp. 1593–1606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Filippov, A.V., Fortuna, S.V., Gurianov, D.A., and Kalashnikov, K.N., On the problem of formation of articles with specified properties by the method of electron beam freeform fabrication, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 2018, vol. 1115, article no. 042044.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kalashnikov, K.N., Rubtsov, V.E., Savchenko, N.L., Kalashnikova, T.A., Osipovich, K.S., Eliseev, A.A., and Chumaevskii, A.V., The effect of wire feed geometry on electron beam freeform 3D printing of complex-shaped samples from Ti–6Al–4V alloy, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2019, vol. 105, pp. 3147–3156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04589-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Eliseev, A.A., Kalashnikova, T.A., and Fortuna, S.V., Structure of AA5056 after friction drilling, AIP Conf. Proc., 2017, vol. 1909, article no. 020039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Program of Fundamental Research of the State Academies of Sciences for 2013–2020, line of research III.23.2.11. X-ray fluorescence analysis was funded by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research according to the research project no. 19-38-90072.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. A. Eliseev.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that the presented data did not result from any conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Translated by I. Moshkin

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eliseev, A.A., Utyaganova, V.R., Vorontsov, A.V. et al. Comparative Analysis of Structure and Mechanical Properties of Additive Objects Manufactured by Electron Beam Method and Cold Metal Transfer. Russ. J. Non-ferrous Metals 61, 517–522 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3103/S106782122005003X

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S106782122005003X

Keywords:

Navigation