Skip to main content
Log in

Hardness and electrical resistivity of Al–13 wt % Mg2Si pseudoeutectic alloy

  • Metallurgy of Nonferrous Metals
  • Published:
Russian Journal of Non-Ferrous Metals Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present work, effect of growth rates on microhardness, electrical properties and microstructure for directionally solidified Al–13 wt % Mg2Si pseudoeutectic alloy at a constant temperature gradient were studied. Directional solidification process were carried out with five different growth rates (V = 8.33–175.0 μm/s) at a constant temperature gradient (G = 6.68 K/mm) by using a Bridgman type directional solidification furnace. Microstructure of directionally solidified Al–13 wt % Mg2Si pseudoeutectic alloy was observed as Mg2Si coral-like structure phase dispersed into primary α-Al phase matrix. The electrical resistivity for Al–13 wt % Mg2Si pseudoeutectic alloy, were measured by the d.c. four-point probe method. The dependency ofmicrohardness and electrical resistivity on growth rates were obtained as HV = 135.7 (V)0.09 and ρ = 17.30 × 10−8(V)0.08, respectively for Al–Mg2Si pseudoeutectic alloy. The results obtained in present work were compared with the previous similar experimental results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kurz, W. and Fisher, D.J., Fundamentals of Solidification, 3th ed., Switzerland: Trans Tech Publications, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rios, C.T., Milenkovic, S., Ferrandini, P.L., and Caram, R., Directional solidification, microstructure and properties of the Al3Nb–Nb2Al eutectic, J. Cryst. Growth, 2005, vol. 275, pp. 153–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. ASM Metals Handbook, vol. 15: Casting, 9th ed., 1988, p. 700.

  4. ASM Metals Handbook, vol. 15: Casting, 9th ed., 1988, p. 640.

  5. Furui, M., Kitamura, T., Ishikawa, T., Ikeno, S., Saikawa, S., and Sakai, N., Evaluation of age hardening behavior using composite rule and microstructure observation in Al–Si–Mg alloy castings, Mater. Trans., 2011, vol. 52, pp. 1163–1167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hari Kumar, K.C., Chakraborti, N., Lukas, H.L., Bodak, O., and Rokhlin, L., Aluminium–Magnesium–Silicon, Landolt-Börnstein; New Series IV/11A3.

  7. Tolnai, D., Townsend, P., Requena, G., Salvo, L., Lendvai, J., and Degischer, H.P., In situ synchrotron tomographic investigation of the solidification of an AlMg4.7Si8 alloy, Acta Materialia, 2012, vol. 60, pp. 2568–2577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Qin, Q.D., Zhao, Y.G., Zhou, W., and Cong, P.J., Effect of phosphorus on microstructure and growth manner of primary Mg2Si crystal in Mg2Si/Al composite, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2007, vol. 447, pp. 186–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Çadirli, E., Ülgen, A., and Gündüz, M., Directional solidification of the Aluminium-Copper eutectic alloy, Mater. Trans., TIM, 1999, vol. 40, no. 9, pp. 989–996.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kaya, H., Çadirli, E., Gündüz, M., and Ülgen, A., Effect of the temperature gradient, growth rate, and the interflake spacing on the micrihardness in the directionally solidified Al–Si eutectic alloy, J. Mater. Eng. Perf., 2003, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 544–551.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Engin, S., Büyük, U., and Marasli, N., The effects of microstructure and growth rate on microhardness, tensile strength, and electrical resistivity for directionally solidified Al–Ni–Fe alloys, J. Alloys Compd., 2016, vol. 660, pp. 23–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Herrmann, K., Hardness Testing-Principles and Applications, ASM International, 2011, ch. 1, p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kaygisiz, Y. and Marasli, N., Microstructural, mechanical and electrical characterization of directionally solidified Al–Si–Mg eutectic alloy, J. Alloys Compd., 2015, vol. 618, pp. 197–203.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Böyük, U., Physical and mechanical properties of Al–Si–Ni eutectic alloy, Met. Mater. Int., 2012, vol. 18, pp. 933–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kaya, H., Çadirli, E., Böyük, U., and Marasli, N., Variation of microindentation hardness with solidification and microstructure parameters in the Al based alloys, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2008, vol. 255, pp. 3071–3078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Brito, C., Reinhart, G., Nguyen-Thi, H., Mangelinck-Noël, N., Cheung, N., Spinelli, J.E., and Garcia, A., High cooling rate cells, dendrites, microstructural spacings and microhardness in a directionally solidified Al–Mg–Si alloy, J. Alloys Compd., 2015, vol. 636, pp. 145–149.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Khan, S., Ourdjini, A., Hamed, Q.S., Najafabadi, M.A.A., and Elliott, R., Hardness and mechanical property relationship in directionally solidified aluminium-silicon eutectic alloys with different silicon morphologies, J. Mater. Sci., 1993, vol. 28, pp. 5957–5962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yusuf Kaygısız.

Additional information

The article is published in the original.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kaygısız, Y., Maraşlı, N. Hardness and electrical resistivity of Al–13 wt % Mg2Si pseudoeutectic alloy. Russ. J. Non-ferrous Metals 58, 15–21 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3103/S1067821217010060

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1067821217010060

Keywords

Navigation