Skip to main content
Log in

Interdependence between the Distribution of a Spin Wave across the Thickness of a Ferrite Plate and the Directions of Its Group and Phase Velocities

  • Published:
Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Physics Aims and scope

Abstract

A study is performed of the general nonreciprocal characteristics of a surface spin wave and a backward spin wave in a tangentially magnetized plane-parallel ferrite plate. The rule governing the interdependence between the localization of a spin wave across the thickness of the ferrite plate and directions of its group and phase velocities is established.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. An exception is when both waves propagate parallel to the vector of an external magnetic field in opposite directions. Only then do these waves have the identical magnetic potential distributions across the ferrite plate and are therefore excited with the same amplitude.

  2. For the sake of brevity, the abbreviation BSW represents the first BSW mode, which is usually observed in experiments.

  3. Quantity Ψ0n is defined below; see Footnote 1 as well.

  4. It is obvious that this rule was formulated in terms of the laws of geometric optics, in which the concept of a beam is used. It is considered that the length of an SW is much less than the width of the beam (or the length of the transducer) and diffraction phenomena are negligible.

  5. Recall that only a collinear SW propagating parallel to axis z exhibits no nonreciprocity.

  6. For the sake of brevity, we call a wave collinear if it is characterized by a collinear orientation of the wave vector and the group velocity vector [12].

  7. Note that Fig. 1 in [16] describes incorrectly the direction of BWS propagation, due to the poor arrangement of the system of coordinates.

  8. The definitions and physical meaning of the cutoff angles of the group velocity and wave vectors were presented in more detail in Section 6.3 of [12].

REFERENCES

  1. Damon, R.W. and Eshbach, J.R., J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 1961, vol. 19, nos. 3–4, p. 308.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Vapne, G.M., Microwave devices based on magnetostatic waves, in Obzory po elektronnoi tekhnike (Reviews on Electronic Engineering), Ser. 1: Elektronika SVCh (Microwave Electronics), Moscow: Elektronika, 1984.

  3. Vashkovskii, A.V., Stal’makhov, V.S., and Sharaev-skii, Yu.P., Magnitostaticheskie volny v elektronike sverkhvysokikh chastot (Magnetostatic Waves in Microwave Electronics), Saratov: Saratov. Gos. Univ., 1993.

  4. Gurevich, A.G. and Melkov, G.A., Magnitnye kolebaniya i volny (Magnetic Vibrations and Waves), Moscow: Nauka, 1994.

  5. Magnonics: From Fundamentals to Applications, Demokritov, S.O. and Slavin, A.N., Eds., Topics in Applied Physics, vol. 125, New York: Springer, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nikitov, S.A., Kalyabin, D.V., Lisenkov, I.V., et al., Phys.—Usp., 2015, vol. 58, no. 4, p. 1002.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chumak, A.V., Vasyuchka, V.I., Serga, A.A., and Hillebrands, B., Nat. Phys., 2015, vol. 11, p. 453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pirro, P., Vasyuchka, V.I., Serga, A.A., and Hillebrands, B., Nat. Rev. Mater., 2021, vol. 6, p. 1114.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Vugalter, G.A. and Korovin, A.G., Tech. Phys. Lett., 1989, vol. 15, no. 21, p. 73.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Annenkov, A.Yu. and Gerus, S.V., Tech. Phys., 1999, vol. 44, no. 1, p. 74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Vashkovsky, A.V. and Lock, E.H., Phys.—Usp., 2006, vol. 49, no. 4, p. 389.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lock, E.H., Phys.—Usp., 2008, vol. 51, no. 4, p. 375.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Annenkov, A.Yu. and Gerus, S.V., Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci.: Phys., 2010, vol. 74, no. 10, p. 1355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Annenkov, A.Yu., Gerus, S.V., and Lock, E.H., EPJ Web Conf., 2018, vol. 185, p. 02006.

  15. Lock, E.H., Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci.: Phys., 2020, vol. 84, no. 2, p. 134.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Lock, E.H., J. Commun. Technol. Electron., 2020, vol. 65, no. 3, p. 265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lock, E.H., J. Commun. Technol. Electron., 2018, vol. 63, no. 8, p. 915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lock, E.H., Phys.—Usp., 2011, vol. 54, no. 3, p. 281.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was performed as part of a State Task from the RF Ministry of Science and Higher Education for the Kotelnikov Institute of Radio Engineering and Electronics.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. H. Lock.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Translated by E. Bondareva

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lock, E.H., Gerus, S.V. Interdependence between the Distribution of a Spin Wave across the Thickness of a Ferrite Plate and the Directions of Its Group and Phase Velocities. Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci. Phys. 87, 1528–1532 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3103/S1062873823703628

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1062873823703628

Navigation