Skip to main content
Log in

Polymorphism of Iron. Part 1. Contradictions of Martensitic and Polymorphous Transformations

  • Published:
Steel in Translation Aims and scope

Abstract

The current state of iron polymorphism is considered as the most significant phase transformation in the industrial technology of iron-carbon alloys, which manifests itself in four forms in the processes of heating and cooling iron. The analysis of literature data revealed the lack of information about the essence of the mechanism of polymorphic transformation of pure iron in domestic basic textbooks and in popular foreign publications on materials science. The main historical stages of the formation and development of the doctrine of iron polymorphism from the moment of its discovery by D.K. Chernov in 1868 to the introduction of the generally accepted diagram by M. Hansen and K. Anderko in 1949 are considered. It is shown that two questions were at the center of scientific discussions: the question is whether iron has polymorphism, and the question of the nature and degree of carbon solubility in polymorphic modifications of iron. The problem of carbon solubility in austenite and ferrite has been a key issue for steelmaking technology. The question of the mechanism of the occurrence of polymorphic transformation, due to its low significance for theory and practice of iron-carbon alloys, has not been widely raised or considered. Consequently, study of the mechanism of polymorphic transformation of pure iron under equilibrium conditions was not relevant for both science and technology of iron-carbon alloys. At present, many researchers believe that, firstly, polymorphic transformation α-Fe ↔ γ-Fe is less studied than similar transformations in other systems, i.e., it is indirectly stated that direct studies of the polymorphism of pure iron have not been carried out at all. Secondly, mechanism of martensitic transformation in steel, which is currently quite well studied, has been arbitrarily transferred to the α-Fe ↔ γ-Fe polymorphic transformation of pure iron. In fact, it is recognized that the mechanism of transformation of supercooled austenite into martensite and polymorphic transformation of pure iron are identical, which is unacceptable. It is well known that the martensitic transformation proceeds by a diffusionless shear mechanism. There are two generally accepted models for the polymorphic transformation for α-Fe ↔ γ-Fe: the shear martensitic mechanism according to the Bain model (tetragonal lattice distortion) and the Kurdyumov-Sachs model (double lattice shift). However, the paradox lies not in these two models, but in the fact that shear martensitic mechanisms were identified with the mechanism of polymorphic transformation of pure iron under equilibrium conditions. On the basis of the performed studies, a logical conclusion is obvious: the mechanisms of both the metastable martensitic transformation in steels and the polymorphic transformation of pure iron in its equilibrium state are based on a single, common diffusion-free deformation transition, but this transition is “triggered” by completely different physical processes, which are absolutely not identical to each other.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.

REFERENCES

  1. Elmanov, G.N., Zaluzhnyi, A.G., Skrytnyi, V.I., et al., Fizicheskoe materialovedenie. Uchebnik dlya vuzov v 7 tomakh (Physical Materials Science: Textbook for Universities in Seven Volumes), vol. 1: Fizika tverdogo tela (Physics of Solid State), Kalin, B.A., Ed., Moscow: Nats.-Issled. Yadernyi Univ. Mosk. Inzh.-Fiz. Inst., 2012.

  2. Elmanov, G.N., Kalin, B.A., Kokhtev, S.A., et al., Fizicheskoe materialovedenie. Uchebnik dlya vuzov v 7 tomakh (Physical Materials Science: Textbook for Universities in Seven Volumes), vol. 2: Osnovy materialovedeniya (Foundations of Materials Science), Kalin, B.A., Ed., Moscow: Nats.-Issled. Yadernyi Univ. Mosk. Inzh.-Fiz. Inst., 2012.

  3. Vintaikin, B.E., Fizika tverdogo tela (Physics of Solid State), Martinson, L.K. and Morozov, A.N., Eds., Moscow: Izd-vo Mosk. Gos. Tekh. Univ. im. N.E. Baumana, 2008.

  4. Gurtov, V.A. and Osaulenko, R.N., Fizika tverdogo tela dlya inzhenerov. Ucheb. posobie (Physics of Solid State for Engineers: Textbook), Aleshin, L.A., Ed., Moscow: Tekhnosfera, 2012, 2nd ed.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bondarenko, G.G., Kabanova, T.A., and Rybalko, V.V., Osnovy materialovedeniya. Uchebnik dlya vysshei shkoly (Foundations of Materials Science: Textbook for Universities), Bondarenko, G.G., Ed., Moscow: BINOM. Laboratoriya Znanii, 2015.

  6. Davydov, A.S., Teoriya tverdogo tela. Ucheb. posob. dlya studentov fiz. spetsial’nostei vuzov (Theory of Solid State: Textbook for Students of Physical Specialties of Universities), Moscow: 1976.

  7. Lakhtin, Yu.M., Materialovedenie i termicheskaya obrabotka metallov. Uchebnik dlya vuzov (Materials Science and Heat Treatment of Metals: Textbook for Universities), Moscow: Metallurgiya, 1983, 3rd ed.

  8. Gulyaev, A.P., Metallovedenie. Uchebnik dlya vuzov (Metals Science: Textbook for Universities), Moscow: Metallurgiya, 1986, 6th ed.

  9. Physical Metallurgy, Cahn, R.W. and Haasen, P., Eds., Amsterdam: North-Holland Physics, 1983, 3rd ed.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hume-Rothery, W. and Raynor, G.V., The Structure of Metals and Alloys, Institute of Metals Monograph and Report Series, vol. 1, London: Inst. of Metals, 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hume-Rothery, W., Elements of Structural Metallurgy, Institute of Metals Monograph and Report Series, vol. 26, London: Inst. of Metals, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kittel, Ch., Introduction to Solid State Physics, New York: Wiley, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smith, M.C., Principles of Physical Metallurgy, New York: Harper, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Barrett, M.A. and Massalsky, T.B., Structure of Metals, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1966, 3rd ed.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Delinger, U., Theoretische Metallkunde, Reine und Angewandte Metallkunde in Einzeldarstellungen, vol. 13, Berlin: Springer, 1955. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53397-6

  16. Tyrkiel, E., Wykres żelazo-węgiel w rozwoju historycznym, Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich Wydawnictwo PAN, 1963.

  17. Okamoto, H., The C–Fe (carbon–iron) system, J. Phase Equilib., 1992, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 543–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02665767

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hansen, M., Anderko, K., and Elliott, R.P., Constituion of Binary Alloys, McGraw-Hill, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Davydov, S.V., Phase diagram of Fe–100% C alloys. Part one. Basic inconsistencies of Fe–Fe3C alloy phase diagram, Steel Transl., 2023, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 144–153. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0967091223020031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Davydov, S.V., Diagramma sostoyaniya splavov sistemy zhelezo-karbid ε-Fe 2 C. Monografiya (Phase Diagram of Fe–ε-Fe2C Iron–Carbide System: Monograph), Moscow: Infra-Inzheneriya, 2021.

  21. Ruer, R., Metallographie in elementarer Darstellung, Hamburg: Verlag von Leopold Voss, 1907.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wendlandt, W.W.M., Thermal Methods of Analysis, New York: Wiley, 1974, 2nd ed.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Brandon, D. and Kaplan, W.D., Microstructural Characterization of Materials, New York: Wiley, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470727133

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Novikova, D.P., Vysokotemperaturnaya metallografiya svarnykh soedinenii (High-Temperature Metallography of Weld Joints), Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 1989.

  25. Praktika teplovoi mikroskopii. Sb. statei (Practice of Thermal Microscopy: Collection of Papers), Lozinskii, M.G. and Ferenets, V.Ya., Eds., Moscow: Nauka, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lozinskii, M.G., Teplovaya mikroskopiya materialov (Thermal Microscopy of Materials), Moscow: Metallurgiya, 1976.

  27. Tolstikhina, A.L., Atomic force microscopy of crystals and fimls with complex surface morphology, Doctoral (Phys.–Math.) Dissertation, Moscow: Instituta Kristallografii im. A.V. Shubnikova, 2013.

  28. Basinski, Z.S., Hume-Rothery, W., and Sutton, A.L., The lattice expansion of iron, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 1955, vol. 229, no. 1179, pp. 459–467. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1955.0102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hultgren, R., Desai, P.D., and Gleiser, H.M., Selected Values of the Thermodynamic Properties of the Elements, Metals Park, Ohio: American Society for Metals, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Popov, A.A., Zhilyakova, M.A., and Zorina, M.A., Fazovye i strukturnye prevrashcheniya v metallicheskikh splavakh. Ucheb. posob. (Phase and Structural Transformations in Metall Alloys: Textbook), Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural. Univ., 2018.

  31. Razumov, I.K., Gornostyrev, Yu.N., and Katsnelson, M.I., Towards the ab initio based theory of phase transformations in iron and steel, Phys. Met. Metallogr., 2017, vol. 118, no. 4, pp. 362–388. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0031918X16130032

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Okishev, K.Yu., Theory and modeling of kinetics of phase transformations and phase structure in iron alloys, Doctoral (Phys.–Math.) Dissertation, Chelyabinsk: South-Ural State Univ., 2013.

  33. Simach-Lafitskii, N.D., Symmetrically achievable structural models of formation of carbide phases in steels and alloys, Cand. Sci. (Phys.–Math.) Dissertation, Moscow: Bauman Moscow State Tech. Univ., 2019.

  34. Spivak, L.V. and Shchepina, N.E., Polymorphic transformations in iron and zirconium, Tech. Phys., 2020, vol. 65, no. 7, pp. 1100–1105. https://doi.org/10.1134/s1063784220070221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Konoplin, N.A., Thermal, baric, and concentration polymorphism of iron, Cand. Sci. (Phys.–Math.) Dissertation, Moscow: Mosk. Inst. Elektron. Tekh., 2006.

  36. Li, Yu., Yuan, G., Li, L., Kang, J., Yan, F., Du, P., Raabe, D., and Wang, G., Ductile 2-GPa steels with hierarchical substructure, Science, 2023, vol. 379, no. 6628, pp. 168–173. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.add7857

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Kurdyumov, G.V., Utevskii, L.M., and Entin, R.I., Prevrashcheniya v zheleze i stali (Transformations in Iron and Steel), Moscow: Nauka, 1977.

  38. Gorelik, S.S., Dobatkin, S.V., and Kaputkina, L.M., Rekristallizatsiya metallov i splavov (Recrystallization of Metals and Alloys), Moscow: Mosk. Inst. Stali i Splavov, 2005.

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by ongoing institutional funding. No additional grants to carry out or direct this particular research were obtained.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. V. Davydov.

Ethics declarations

The author of this work declares that he has no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Translated by Sh. Galyaltdinov

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Davydov, S.V. Polymorphism of Iron. Part 1. Contradictions of Martensitic and Polymorphous Transformations. Steel Transl. 53, 675–684 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0967091223080053

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0967091223080053

Keywords:

Navigation