Skip to main content
Log in

Optimizing the coking coal employed at OAO NTMK to ensure competitive CSR and CRI values of coke

  • Published:
Steel in Translation Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Rudyka, V.I., Role of Technological Factors in the Current Stage of Development of Metallurgical and Coke Production, Koks Khim., 2006, no. 6, pp. 2–7.

  2. Negro, P., Steller, J.M., Beppler, E., et al., Assessment of Coke Degradation in the Blast Furnace from Tuyeres Probing Investigations, Proceedings of Third European Ironmaking Congress (CRM-VDEh), Gent, Belgium, 1996, pp. 20–27.

    Google Scholar 

  3. March, H., Forrest, M., and Pacheco, L.A., Structure in Metallurgical Cokes and Carbons as Studied by Etching with Atomic Oxygen and Chromic Acid, Fuel, 1981, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 423–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Grosspietsch, K., Lunden, H.B., Dauwels, G., et al., Coke Quality Requirements by European Blast Furnace Operators in the Turn of the Millennium, Rev. Metallurgie (CIT), 1999, vol. 96, no. 10, pp. 2–11.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Poveromo, J.J., Operational Considerations for High-Level Blast Furnace Fuel Injection, Proceedings of Fifty-Fifth Ironmaking Conference (ISS-AIME), 1996, pp. 79–92.

  6. O’Donnell, E.M. and Poveromo, J.J., Coke Quality Requirements from a North American Perspective, Proceedings of Fourth European Coke and Ironmaking Congress, Paris, 2000, vol. 1, pp. 12–19.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nishioka, K., History and Future of the Japanese Cokemaking Technology, J. Japan. Inst. Energy, 2000, vol. 79(876), pp. 284–298.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Horrocks, K.R., Cunningham, R.B., Ellison, J.E., and Nightingale, R.J., Coke Quality at BHP Steel Port Kembla, Proceedings of Fourth European Coke and Ironmaking Congress, Paris, 2000, vol. 1, pp. 167–173.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dall, Z., Present Situation and Prospect of Cokemaking Production Technology at Ma’anshan Iron & Steel Company, China International Coking Technology and Cokemaking Congress, Beijing, 2004, pp. 316–319.

  10. Vents, V.A., Cheremiskina, A.N., Kiseleva, N.I., and Fatkhudina, R.K., Using GZh Coal from the Kaa-Khemskii Mine in Coking Batch, Koks Khim., 2006, no. 11, pp. 6–8.

  11. Nakamura, N., Togino, V., and Tateoka, Behavior of Coke in Large Blast Furnace, Coal, Coke, and Blast Furnace, London: The Metals Society, 1977, pp. 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Prasad, H.N., Singh, B.K., and Chatterjee, A., Production of High CSR Coke by Stamp Charging: Possibilities and Limitations, Cokemaking Intern., 1999, no. 2, pp. 50–59.

  13. Stepanov, Yu.V., Gilyazetdinov, R.R., Popova, N.K., and Makhortova, L.A., Influence of Optimizing the Batch Composition and Ash Content on Coke Quality, Koks Khim., 2005, no. 7, pp. 14–18.

  14. Zolotukhin, Yu.A., Gainieva, G.R., Patrushev, A.V., and Saltanov, A.V., Properties and Behavior of Poorly-Sintering Low-Metamorphic Coal in Coking Batch, Koks Khim., 2000, no. 9, pp. 2–9.

  15. Kiselev, B.P., Ol’shanetskii, L.G., Stukov, M.I., and Zolotukhin, Yu.A., Evaluating Coal Reserves in Planning Coking-Batch Composition, Koks Khim., 1984, no. 10, pp. 4–7.

  16. Zolotukhin, Yu.A., Principles for Batch Formulation at Coal-Enrichment Facilities: Criteria for Quality Evaluation, Koks Khim., 1999, no. 12, pp. 2–10.

  17. Zolotukhin, Yu.A. and Raskina, E.G., Reasons for the Different Coking Properties of Kuznetsk-Coal Concentrates with Similar Technological Properties, Koks Khim., 1989, no. 2, pp. 4–6.

  18. Zolotukhin, Yu.A., Reflectogram Analysis of Coal and Coal Mixtures. 1. Monitoring the Stability of Coal Supplies to Coal-Enrichment Facilities and the Quality of Coking Coal, Koks Khim., 1993, nos. 9–10, pp. 2–8.

  19. Zolotukhin, Yu.A., Kukolev, Ya.B, Andreichikov, N.S., et al., Batch Formulation for Coking at OAO NTMK and Development of Additional Criteria for Quality Evaluation. 2. Industrial Coking, Koks Khim., 2006, no. 5, pp. 20–25.

  20. Zolotukhin, Yu.A., Kukolev, Ya.B, Andreichikov, N.S., et al., Batch Formulation for Coking at OAO NTMK and Development of Additional Criteria for Quality Evaluation. 2. Case Coking, Koks Khim., 2005, no. 12, pp. 2–10.

  21. Zolotukhin, Yu.A., Reflectogram Analysis of Coal and Coal Mixtures. 2. Formulating Coal Batch, Koks Khim., 1995, no. 6, pp. 2–11.

  22. Zolotukhin, Yu.A. and Sulimov, G.I., Petrographic Analysis of Coal and Coal Batch and Improving the Quality of Casting Coke, Koks Khim., 1990, no. 3, pp. 37–42.

  23. Stankevich, A.S., Zolotukhin, Yu.A., Kalinina, G.I., et al., Relation between the Mechanical Strength of Coke, the Chemical and Petrographic Parameters of the Kuznetsk Coal Batch, and the Coking Conditions, Koks Khim., 1981, no. 2, pp. 27–31.

  24. Zolotukhin, Yu.A. and Stankevich, A.S., Influence of the Petrographic Composition of Coal Batch on the Reactivity of Coke, Koks Khim., 1981, no. 10, pp. 26–29.

  25. Zolotukhin, Yu.A., Technological Value of Coking Coal, Koks Khim., 1996, no. 8, pp. 6–10.

  26. Zolotukhin, Yu.A., Quality of Russian Coking Coal. 3. Determining the Quality Characteristics, Koks Khim., 2005, no. 6, pp. 14–17.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Original Russian Text © A.V. Kushnarev, A.A. Kirichkov, N.A. Berkutov, R.R. Gilyazetdinov, Yu.A. Zolotukhin, 2007, published in “Stal’,” 2007, No. 11, pp. 54–58.

Ya.B. Kukolev participated in this research.

About this article

Cite this article

Kushnarev, A.V., Kirichkov, A.A., Berkutov, N.A. et al. Optimizing the coking coal employed at OAO NTMK to ensure competitive CSR and CRI values of coke. Steel Transl. 37, 948–953 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0967091207110137

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0967091207110137

Keywords

Navigation