Abstract
This study provides an ex ante short-run impact analysis of tariff liberalisation in the context of the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) on the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) customs union regarding tariff revenue and import values. As with other customs union on the continent, ECOWAS negotiates within the AfCFTA as a bloc (including Mauritania). Tariff revenue losses for a scenario with 97% tariff liberalisation (Categories A and B) amount to around USD $262.7 million at the end of the implementation period, representing 12.5% of total tariff revenue, and USD $201.9 million for a scenario with 90% tariff liberalisation (Category A), representing 9.7% of total tariff revenue. This is more than the USD $54 million inferred from estimates by the World Bank (2020), which assumed 90% tariff liberalisation. Tariff losses for ECOWAS are likely to be larger than previously estimated, mainly because ECOWAS negotiates as a bloc and because its selection of sensitive sectors exempted from liberalisation (Category C) is not optimised at the country level to minimise revenue loss. Import increases on account of ECOWAS tariff concessions under the AfCFTA are estimated to be relatively small (1.3–1.8% total increase). As such, the main worry of ECOWAS policymakers, on aggregate, should not be a deluge of African imports competing with regional or domestic production. Further research is needed to understand the distributional impact among ECOWAS countries and on the benefits of other African countries opening market access to ECOWAS exports.
Article PDF
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abrego M.L., Amado M.A., Gursoy T., Nicholls G.P., Perez-Saiz H., 2019. The African Continental Free Trade Agreement: Welfare Gains Estimates from a General Equilibrium Model, International Monetary Fund, Working Paper No. 19/124. Retrieved from: https://www.imf.org/en/ Publications/WP/Issues/2019/06/07/The-African-Continental-Free-Trade-Agreement-Welfare-Gains-Estimates-from-a-General-46881.
Armington P.S., 1969. A Theory of Demand for Products Distinguished by Place of Production, Int. Monet. Fund 16, 159–178. Retrieved from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3866403.
Bacchetta M., Beverelli C., Cadot O., Fugazza M., Grether J.M., Helble M., et al., 2012. A Practical Guide to Trade Policy Analysis, World Trade Organization & United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), Geneva, Switzerland. Retrieved from: https://vi.unctad.org/tpa/.
Brenton P., Saborowski C., Staritz C., von Uexkull E., 2009. Assessing the Adjustment Implications of Trade Policy Changes using TRIST (Tariff Reform Impact Simulation Tool), World Bank, Washington, DC. (Policy Research Working Paper 5045). Retrieved from: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/804891468339572958/pdf/WPS5045.pdf.
Buffie E.F., 2001. Trade Policy in Developing Countries, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Chauvin N.D., Ramos M.P., Porto G., 2016. Trade, Growth, and Welfare Impacts of the CFTA in Africa, International Household Survey Network (IHSN). Retrieved from: https://hesso.tind.io//record/2006/files/Depetris-Chauvin_2017_trade_growth_welfare.pdf.
Cheelo C., Malata N., Tembo J., 2012. What do the COMESA Customs Union and COMESA-EAC-SADC Tripartite Free Trade Area mean for Zambia’s import trade and trade tax revenue? Working Paper No. 6, Zambia Institute for Policy Analysis & Research (ZIPAR), Lusaka, Zambia. Retrieved from: https://media.africaportal.org/documents/COMESA_Customs_Union_and__COMESA-EAC-SADC_Tripartite_ Free_Trade_Area.pdf.
Davies R., Rattsø J., Torvik R., 1998. Short-run consequences of trade liberalization: a computable general equilibrium model of Zimbabwe, J. Policy Model. 20, 305–333. Retrieved from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0161893897000136?viaDihub.
de Córdoba S.F., Laird S., Maur J.C., Serena J.M., 2006. Adjustment costs and trade liberalization, in: Laird S., de Córdoba S.F. (Eds.), Coping with Trade Reforms, Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp. 66–85. Retrieved from: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057%2F9780230377806_4.
Dillen K., 2015. The Russian ban on EU agricultural imports: a bilateral extension of AGLINK-COSIMO (No. 1008-2016-80082). Retrieved from: https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/agsiaae15/211574.htm.
Hosein R., Gookool R., Lorde T., 2018. Trade, fiscal and welfare considerations of the CARIFORUM-EU Economic Partnership Agreement: a CARICOM perspective, in: Briguglio L. (Ed.), Handbook of Small States: Economic, Social and Environmental Issues, Routledge, London. Retrieved from: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781351181846-4/trade-fiscal-welfare-considerations-cariforum-eu-economic-partnership-agreement-caricom-perspective-roger-hosein-rebecca-gookool-troy-lorde.
International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2005. Dealing with the Revenue Consequences of Trade Reform, IMF, Washington, DC. Retrieved from: https://www.imf.org/external/np/pp/eng/2005/021505.pdf.
Karami O., Mahmoudi M., 2018. Estimating Trade-Related Adjustment Costs in the Agricultural Sector in Iran. Retrieved from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.04238.
Kee H.L., Nicita A., Olarreaga M., 2004. Import Demand Elasticities and Trade Distortions, Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), London. Retrieved from: https://cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=4669.
Lunenborg P., 2019. ‘Phase 1B’ of the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) negotiations (Policy Brief No. 63, June 2019). Retrieved from: https://www.southcentre.int/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/PB63_Phase-1B-of-the-AfCFTA-negotiations_EN-1.pdf.
Mevel S., Karingi S., 2012. Deepening Regional Integration in Africa: A Computable General Equilibrium Assessment of the Establishment of a Continental Free Trade Area followed by a Continental Customs Union, in: 7th African Economic Conference, Kigali, Rwanda. Retrieved from: https://aec.afdb.org/sites/default/files/2019/12/04/deepening_regional_integration_in_africa_a_computable_general_ equilibrium_assessment_of_the_establishment_of_a_continental_free_trade_area_followed_by_a_continental_customs_union.pdf.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2020. Revenue Statistics - African Countries: Comparative Tables, OECD Statistics (Database), Paris, France. Retrieved from: https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=RS_AFR.
Saygili M., Peters R., Knebel C., 2018. African Continental Free Trade Area: Challenges and Opportunities of Tariff Reductions (UNCTAD Research Paper No. 15). Retrieved from: https://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/ser-rp-2017d15_en.pdf.
Tarr D., Matusz S.J., 2005. The adjustment costs of trade liberalization (English), World Bank Group, Washington, DC. Retrieved from: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/459791485150513352/The-adjustment-costs-of-trade-liberalization.
UNU-WIDER, 2016. Tax revenue implications of trade liberalization in low-income countries, UNU-WIDER Working Paper No. 2016/173.
Retrieved from: https://www.wider.unu.edu/publication/tax-revenue-implications-trade-liberalization-low-income-countries.
Waglé S., 2011. Investing across Borders with Heterogeneous Firms: Do FDI-specific Regulations Matter? Policy Research Working Paper No. 5914, World Bank, Washington, DC. Retrieved from: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/271111468182678153/pdf/WPS5914.pdf.
World Bank (WB), 2015. Connecting food staples and input markets in West Africa: a regional trade agenda for ECOWAS countries, World Bank Group, Washington, DC. Retrieved from: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/918631468197340135/Connecting-food-staples-and-input-markets-in-West-Africa-a-regional-trade-agenda-for-ECOWAS-countries.
World Bank (WB), 2020. World Bank. The African Continental Free Trade Area: Economic and Distributional Effects, World Bank, Washington, DC. Retrieved from: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/34139/9781464815591.pdf.
World Bank (WB), 2020. World Development Indicators (WDI), Washington, DC. Retrieved from: https://data.worldbank.org/.
World Bank (WB), 2020. World Integrated Trade Solution (WITS), Washington, DC. Retrieved from: https://wits.worldbank.org/Default.aspx?lang=en.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Peer review under responsibility of the African Export-Import Bank
Data availability statement: The data that support the findings of this study are freely available from the corresponding author [PL], upon reasonable request.
Rights and permissions
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
About this article
Cite this article
Lunenborg, P., Roberts, T. ECOWAS and AfCFTA: Potential Short-Run Impact of a Draft ECOWAS Tariff Offer. J Afr Trade 8 (Suppl 2), 103–114 (2021). https://doi.org/10.2991/jat.k.211011.001
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/jat.k.211011.001