Detection of Cryptosporidium parvum in a Red-Eared Slider Turtle (Trachemys scripta elegans), a Noted Invasive Alien Species, Captured in a Rural Aquatic Ecosystem in Eastern Poland

Abstract

Purpose

Little is known about cryptosporidiosis in turtles of invasive alien species (IAS) inhabiting European bodies of fresh water. In this article, we report an occurrence of Cryptosporidium parvum in a red-eared slider turtle (Trachemys scripta elegans) captured in a rural aquatic ecosystem in eastern Poland.

Methods

A pair of samples consisting of feces and scrapings of intestinal mucosa (taken during necropsy) were collected from 104 animals representing the four IAS turtle species red-eared slider, yellow-bellied slider, false map and Cumberland slider. The animals were trapped in running and standing freshwater ecosystems across the Lublin province. Parasite genomic DNA was extracted from samples using a modified alkali wash and a heat-lysis method and identification of the Cryptosporidium species was performed at the 18SSU rRNA and COWP loci.

Results

The presence of Cryptosporidium DNA was only detected in one sample of intestinal scraping collected from a red-eared slider. A phylogenetic analysis of a 18SSU rRNA gene fragment showed 100% sequence identity between the C. parvum strain isolated from the turtle and other C. parvum strains previously detected in cattle from the Lublin province.

Conclusions

There was no clinical evidence that the red-eared slider turtle was truly infected rather than being merely a mechanical parasite carrier. Sporadic detection of this protozoan parasite in the studied population of IAS turtles could be associated with low natural occurrence of Cryptosporidium infections in this animal species. The results provide evidence for possible transmission of zoonotic Cryptosporidium species by IAS turtles.

Introduction

Infections caused by Cryptosporidium protozoan parasites were recognised in more than 150 animal species. The group of vertebrates in which Cryptosporidium infections are poorly known are reptiles, with infections usually following an asymptomatic course [1, 2]. Cryptosporidiosis in tortoises mainly occurred among animals kept in poor conditions in captivity [3, 4] or suffering from viral or bacterial diseases [5, 6]. In tortoises, Cryptosporidium testudinis (Cryptosporidium tortoise genotype I), C. ducismarci (genotype II) and III are the genotypes mainly responsible for infections [2, 4]. Although Cryptosporidium infections have also been reported in turtles, the identification of the parasite at species level has not been performed [7, 8]. Similarly to tortoises, turtles are very popular as companion animals. It is reported that 690,401 turtles representing 15 species were imported to Europe in the years 2008–2012 [9]. The major varieties kept as pets are red-eared sliders (Trachemys scripta elegans), common map turtles (Graptemys geographica), painted turtles (Chrysemys picta), and common snapping turtles (Chelydra serpentina) [9]. They are alien species in Europe and have been released without sanction; only thereby are they found in the wild on this continent. Their presence in natural environments is undesirable and as invasive species they pose threats to local ecosystems [10]. Additionally, they could be a source of pathogenic microorganisms for native turtle species but also zoonotic pathogens for humans [11]. In this article, we report an occurrence of C. parvum in a captured turtle of an invasive alien species (IAS) from a rural aquatic ecosystem.

Material and Methods

Fecal samples and/or scrapings of intestinal mucosa were collected from 104 turtles belonging to the following species: red-eared slider (Trachemys scripta elegans), yellow-bellied slider (Trachemys scripta scripta), false map turtle (Graptemys pseudogeographica), and Cumberland slider (Trachemys scripta troostii). For the majority of animals (67 turtles), a pair of samples (feces and intestinal scrapings) was taken for testing. In the case of 37 animals only intestinal scrapings were collected due to difficulties in obtaining fecal material. Feces was taken after trapping, during transportation or at the beginning of quarantine (stress associated defecation). For quarantined animals defecation was occasionally observed and voided feces quickly dissolved in water present in a terrarium. Therefore renewed sampling of the feces was not possible. IAS turtles were found inhabiting running and standing freshwater ecosystems across the Lublin province and were captured over a 3-year period from 2015 to 2017 (Fig. 1). Immediately after trapping, their health status and condition were assessed. Subsequently animals were individually placed in a terrarium for 14 days’ quarantine which allowed fecal material to be collected. After quarantine, turtles were subjected to euthanasia and necropsy. Detailed information on the animal trapping sites, species and number of collected turtles are presented in Table 1.

Fig. 1
figure1

Location of turtle capture sites in the Lublin province

Table 1 Information on the animal trapping sites, species and number of collected turtles

Parasite genomic DNA was extracted from 0.1 g of feces or intestinal scrapings using a previously described method of an alkali-wash and heat-lysis developed by Millar et al. [12] with further modifications [13]. A positive extraction control (turtle feces contaminated with C. parvum oocysts (Iowa strain, Waterborne, Inc., New Orleans, LA, USA), and a negative control (water instead of the analyzed template) were included and simultaneously processed for each set of samples. To improve DNA quality and purity it was purified further with a GeneMATRIX PCR/DNA Clean-Up Purification Kit (EURx, Ltd., Gdańsk, Poland) as recommended by the manufacturer. The identification of Cryptosporidium species was performed at the 18SSU rRNA and COWP loci [14, 15]. Subsequently a restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis was performed for the 18SSU rRNA-positive product as previously described [15, 16]. A definitive identification of detected Cryptosporidium species was performed based on sequence analysis of the 18SSU rRNA amplicon [13]. The obtained nucleotide sequence was compared to other Cryptosporidium sequences available in the GenBank using a neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree with Kimura two-parameter model (MEGA 7.0.9). The reliability assessment of a phylogenetic tree topology (bootstrap) was performed at 1000 replicates, and the phylogenetic relationship between analyzed sequences was considered reliable when the bootstrap value was ≥ 70%. The obtained sequence was deposited in the GenBank under accession number MK347428.

Results and Discussion

IAS encompass different animal and plant species introduced to a habitat foreign to them. They can alter the organisation and functioning of local ecosystems and be a source or mechanical carriers for different animal and human pathogens [17, 18]. Polish and European Union legislation listed the following species of turtles as IAS: Trachemys scripta (red-eared slider, Cumberland slider, and yellow-bellied slider), Chelydra serpentina (common snapping turtle), Chrysemys picta (painted turtle) and Graptemys pseudogographica (false map turtle) [19]. In this study a molecular survey was conducted aiming to detect Cryptosporidium infections in IAS turtles captured from freshwater ecosystems of the Lublin province. All the animals trapped for this research were in good condition without any symptoms of systematic disease except one weakened red-eared slider turtle with anemia and swollen eyelids (personal communication with Dr Aleksandra Maluta and Dr Nadia Chlebicka). Although, other turtles did not show any symptoms of disease, in some animals, the macroscopic lesions were observed in internal organs during necroscopy. The presence of Cryptosporidium DNA was only detected in one sample of intestinal scraping collected from a red-eared slider which was found in Uściwierz Lake in Polesie National Park. Subsequent 18SSU rRNA sequence analysis revealed the presence of C. parvum (GenBank No. MK347428). The captured male turtle weighed 540 g and was in good health without signs of any systematic disease. A physical examination revealed the presence of rachitic changes in the carapace with confined losses in the stratum corneum of the plastron. At necropsy there were no changes observed in the pleuro-peritoneal cavity except the enlargement of the liver and gallbladder. There were no signs of gastroenteritis. The COWP-PCR analysis gave a negative result but an insufficient amount of DNA sample was available for subsequent GP60 subtyping. The phylogenetic analysis of the 18SSU rRNA gene fragment showed 100% sequence identity between the C. parvum strain isolated from the turtle and other C. parvum strains previously detected in cattle from Lublin province. A neighbour-joining analysis also indicated that all C. parvum strains of cattle origin found in Poland, France, China and Brazil are related and share 99.5–100% nucleotide sequence identity (Fig. 2). Although strain identification at sub-genotype level was not successful, the observed sequence similarities between strains and their subtype assignment strengthen the assumption that the turtle C. parvum strain could be of livestock origin. There was no evidence that the wild-living turtle was truly infected rather than merely passing oocysts through its gastrointestinal tract and acting only as a mechanical parasite carrier. The lack of clinical signs of infection or anatomopathological changes in its gastrointestinal tract may support this assumption. It has previously been shown that environmental abundance of C. parvum oocysts in areas of high livestock production led to contamination of fresh produce grown in these areas [20]. In this study, one possibility is that oocyst transmission to the turtle was via Cryptosporidium-contaminated water, but another is acquisition of the parasite through contact with cattle manure used as a crop fertiliser.

Fig. 2
figure2

The phylogenetic tree constructed with a neighbour-joining method with Kimura two-parameter model (MEGA 7.0.9) using the nucleotide sequences (693 bp) of the 18SSU rRNA gene fragment of strains Cryptosporidium tortoise genotype III, Cryptosporidium varanii, C. ducismarci, C. tyzzeri, C. testudinis and C. parvum strains detected in red-eared slider in this study and cattle. C. parvum strains identified in Poland were marked with orange squares

The majority of reports dealing with reptile cryptosporidiosis concern snakes, lizards, iguanas or tortoises kept in captivity [21,22,23]. They usually describe fatal cases of infections characterised by enteritis in which parasites were observed microscopically in the intestinal content [3, 5]. However, one study found that while Cryptosporidium contributed significantly to animal death, it was not solely responsible [5]. Usually infections in reptiles have an asymptomatic course and disease is triggered by an environmental stressor. As with wild-living tortoises, Cryptosporidium infections in turtles are not well documented, but Cryptosporidium oocysts were identified in fecal and intestinal contents of free-ranging marine green turtles (Chelonia mydas) and in bog turtles (Clemmys muhlenbergi) [7, 8].

Here, molecular tools were used to study Cryptosporidium prevalence in wild turtles with methods more sensitive than microscopy. Of note is that there is no standardization for protocols used for the detection of oocysts in animal feces or to diagnose the infection. Nevertheless, the reliability of the primer sets targeting Cryptosporidium 18SSU rRNA and COWP gene fragments for specific parasite detection has previously been proven [14]. It is noteworthy that cryptosporidial 18SSU rRNA protocols are more sensitive, therefore they are mainly recommended for the detection of parasite DNA in fecal samples of different animal species [15, 24]. Despite this, only a sporadic occurrence of C. parvum in wild turtles was found. Infrequent detection of this protozoan parasite in the studied turtle population could be associated with a low occurrence of infections. Although feces were collected from majority of captured turtles for an assessment of infection occurrence, the intestinal scrapings were also sampled. However, they were collected after 14 days of a quarantine period when oocysts shedding might not occur due to parasite clearance. This could be considered as a major limitation of the study. Nevertheless, one sample of intestinal scrapings was positive for Cryptosporidium DNA, although feces collected from this animal was parasite-free. It is not surprising, as an intermittent Cryptosporidium shedding is often observed, therefore testing of single fecal sample after animal capture did not guarantee a detection of infection. It would be highly valuable to test a pair of fecal samples few days (weeks) apart to obtain more accurate data. However, it will be very difficult to meet this condition for captured wildlife. Nevertheless, this approach was partly addressed by testing feces and intestinal scrapings at least for some animals. Other infectious disease co-occurrence is usual when reptile cryptosporidiosis is observed or it affects reptiles being kept in stressful environmental conditions which quickly deteriorate their health resulting in death. Of note, most of the captured and examined turtles were healthy without any symptoms of disease. Their good health status was also confirmed by necroscopy (results not shown in this study). In this light, the sporadic discovery of C. parvum in IAS turtles may indicate that they could play a minor role in transmission of zoonotic Cryptosporidium to different hosts. It is highly likely that the infected turtle served only as passive carrier of this protozoan parasite. Nevertheless, these data could be useful in order to determine the public health risk related to pet turtles of IAS species as a source of zoonotic Cryptosporidium in general, and in particular during an epidemiological investigation of disease cases in humans. Meanwhile, the results provide evidence for possible transmission of zoonotic Cryptosporidium species by IAS turtles.

References

  1. 1.

    Hedley J, Eatwell K, Shaw DJ (2013) Gastrointestinal parasitic burdens in UK tortoises: a survey of tortoise owners and potential risk factors. Vet Rec 173:525. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.101794

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Jezkova J, Horcickova M, Hlaskova L, Sak B, Kvetonova D, Novak J, Hofmannova L, McEvoy J, Kvac M (2016) Cryptosporidium testudinis sp. n., Cryptosporidium ducismarci Traversa, 2010 and Cryptosporidium tortoise genotype III (Apicomplexa: Cryptosporidiidae) in tortoises. Folia Parasitologica (Praha) 14:63. https://doi.org/10.14411/fp.2016.035

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Alves M, Xiao L, Lemos V, Zhou L, Cama V, da Cunha MB, Matos O, Antunes F (2005) Occurrence and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. in mammals and reptiles at the Lisbon Zoo. Parasitol Res 97:108–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-005-1384-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Richter B, Rasim R, Vrhovec MG, Nedorost N, Pantchev N (2012) Cryptosporidiosis outbreak in captive chelonians (Testudo hermanni) with identification of two Cryptosporidium genotypes. J Vet Diagn Invest 24:591–595. https://doi.org/10.1177/1040638712440989

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Graczyk TK, Cranfield MR, Mann J, Strandberg JD (1998) Intestinal Cryptosporidium sp. infection in the Egyptian tortoise Testudo kleinmanni. Int J Parasitol 28:1885–1888. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7519(98)00143-X

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Paries S, Funcke S, Lierz M (2018) Investigations on the prevalence of tortoise picorna-virus in captive tortoises in Germany. Tierärztliche Praxis Ausgabe Kleintiere Heimtiere 46:304–308. https://doi.org/10.15654/TPK-180156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Graczyk TK, Cranfield MR (1998) Experimental transmission of Cryptosporidium oocyst isolates from mammals, birds and reptiles to captive snakes. Vet Res 29:187–195

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Graczyk TK, Balazs GH, Work T, Aguirre AA, Ellis DM, Murakawa S, Morris R (1997) Cryptosporidium sp. infections in Green Turtles, Chelonia mydas, as a potential source of marine waterborne oocysts in the Hawaiian Islands. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:2925–2927

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kopecký O, Kalous L, Patoka J (2013) Establishment risk from pet-trade freshwater turtles in the European Union. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 10:02. https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2013057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    EU Regulation. 2014. No 1143/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 on the prevention and management of the introduction and spread of invasive alien species. https://www.eea.europa.eu/policy-documents/ec-2014-regulation-eu-no

  11. 11.

    Goławska O, Demkowska-Kutrzepa M, Borzym E, Różański P, Zając M, Rzeżutka A, Wasyl D (2017) Microflora and parasitofauna of alien and invasive turtle species. Postępy Mikrobiologii 56:163–170

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Millar C, Moore J, Lowery C, McCorry K, Dooley J (2001) Successful PCR amplification of genomic DNA from Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts extracted from a human faecal sample: a rapid and simple method suited for outbreak analysis. Int J Hyg Environ Health 204:191–194. https://doi.org/10.1078/1438-4639-00090

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Rzeżutka A, Kaupke A (2013) Occurrence and molecular identification of Cryptosporidium species isolated from cattle in Poland. Vet Parasitol 196:301–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2013.03.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Homan W, van Gorkom T, Kan YY, Hepener J (1999) Characterization of Cryptosporidium parvum in human and animal feces by single-tube nested polymerase chain reaction and restriction analysis. Parasitol Res 85:707–712

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Xiao L, Escalante L, Yang C, Sulaiman I, Escalante AA, Montali RJ, Fayer R, Lal AA (1999) Phylogenetic analysis of Cryptosporidium parasites based on the small-subunit rRNA gene locus. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:1578–1583

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Xiao L, Moore JE, Ukoh U, Gatei W, Lowery CJ, Murphy TM, Dooley JS, Millar BC, Rooney PJ, Rao JR (2006) Prevalence and identity of Cryptosporidium spp. in pig slurry. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:4461–4463. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00370-06

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Karesh WB, Cook RA, Bennett EL, Newcomb J (2005) Wildlife trade and global disease emergence. Emerg Infect Dis 7:1000–1002. https://doi.org/10.14411/fp.2016.035

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    EEA (2012) The impacts of invasive alien species in Europe. EEA Technical reports No 16/2012. Publications Office of the European Union, Brussels, Luxemburg. https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/impacts-of-invasive-alien-species

  19. 19.

    Anonymous (2011) Ordinance of the Minister of the Environment of 9 September 2011 on the list of plants and animals of alien species which, if released into the natural environment, may threaten native species or natural habitats Dz. U. 2011, No 210, item 1260.

  20. 20.

    Rzeżutka A, Nichols RA, Connelly L, Kaupke A, Kozyra I, Cook N, Birrell S, Smith HV (2010) Cryptosporidium oocysts on fresh produce from areas of high livestock production in Poland. Int J Food Microbiol 139:96–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.01.027

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Sevá AP, Sercundes MK, Martins J, de Souza SO, da Cruz JB, Lisboa CS, Correa SH, Soares RM (2011) Occurrence and molecular diagnosis of Cryptosporidium serpentis in captive snakes in São Paulo, Brazil. J Zoo Wildl Med 42:326–329. https://doi.org/10.1638/2010-0157.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Zahedi A, Paparini A, Jian F, Robertson I, Ryan U (2016) Public health significance of zoonotic Cryptosporidium species in wildlife: critical insights into better drinking water management. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl 5:88–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijppaw.2015.12.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Gałęcki R, Sokół R (2018) Treatment of cryptosporidiosis in captive green iguanas (Iguana iguana). Vet Parasitol 252:17–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2018.01.018

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Ryan U, Xiao L, Read C, Zhou L, Lal AA, Pavlasek I (2003) Identification of novel Cryptosporidium genotypes from the Czech Republic. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:4302–4307. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.69.7.4302-4307.2003

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Dr Aleksandra Maluta and Dr Nadia Chlebicka for performing physical examination on turtles and acquisition of clinical data. Special thanks to Dr Agnieszka Jasik from the National Veterinary Research Institute, Puławy, Poland for sharing results of anatomopathological investigation of the turtles.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Science Centre project “Invasive turtle species as a source and vector of animal and human pathogens” (Grant no. 2013/11/B/NZ7/01690) and by the KNOW (Leading National Research Centre) Scientific Consortium “Healthy Animal—Safe Food”, under the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education resolution no. 05-1/KNOW2/2015.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Artur Rzeżutka.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval for turtle trapping and euthanasia was not required according to the Local Bioethical Committee at the University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Poland (statement of 14 Oct 2014).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rzeżutka, A., Kaupke, A. & Gorzkowski, B. Detection of Cryptosporidium parvum in a Red-Eared Slider Turtle (Trachemys scripta elegans), a Noted Invasive Alien Species, Captured in a Rural Aquatic Ecosystem in Eastern Poland. Acta Parasit. 65, 768–773 (2020). https://doi.org/10.2478/s11686-020-00180-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Cryptosporidium parvum
  • Detection
  • Red-eared slider turtle
  • Invasive species