Skip to main content
Log in

Transmission of Podisus maculiventris tremulatory signals through plants

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Central European Journal of Biology

Abstract

Males of the predaceous stink bug Podisus maculiventris (Say) (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae: Asopinae) emit low frequency tremulatory signals. Laser vibrometry was used to record and analyze naturally emitted signals, focusing on variation in signal velocity and frequency during transmission through plants (Phaseolus vulgaris L. and Plumbago auriculata Lam.) as a function of distance from the vibrational source. Signal velocity varied individually between 2 and 15 mm/s recorded on a plant close to the calling male and decreased by 0.3 to 1.5 dB/cm on bean and 0.3 to 0.9 dB/cm on plumbago. The dominant frequency of signals was variable at frequencies below 50 Hz. On bean frequencies centered around 10 Hz or 20 Hz were dominant for signals recorded at the source. Transmission through bean resulted in an increase in the 20 Hz peak relative to other frequencies in the signal. Variation of the dominant frequencies of signals transmitted through plumbago stems were more predictable, showing typical changes in amplitude relative to the distance from the source. The regular variation of the dominant frequency along the stem with linear increase of signal velocity at decreasing distance from the source may provide plant-dwelling insects with information about the distance to the calling individual.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. De Clercq P., Predaceous stinkbugs (Pentatomidae: Asopinae), In: Schaefer C.W., Panizzi A.R., (Eds.), Heteroptera of Economic Importance, Boca Raton London New York Washington D.C., CRC Press, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pfannenstiel R.S., Hunt R.E., Yeargan K.V., Orientation of hemipteran predator to vibrations produced by feeding caterpillars, J. Insect Behav., 1995, 8, 1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gogala M., Vibratory signals produced by Heteroptera — Pentatomorpha and Cimicomorpha, In: Drosopoulos S., Claridge M.F., (Eds.), Insect Sound and Communication: Physiology, Behavior, Ecology and Evolution, Boca Raton London New York, CRC Taylor & Francis Group, 2006

  4. Shestakov L.S., Studies of vibratory signals in pentatomid bugs (Heteroptera, Asopinae) from European Russia, Entomol. Rev., 2008, 88, 20–25

    Google Scholar 

  5. Žunič A., Čokl A., Virant-Doberlet M., Millar J.G., Communication with signals produced by abdominal vibration, tremulation, and percussion in Podisus maculiventris (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae), Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 2008, 101, 1169–1178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Benediktov A.A., Tremulation of firebugs Pyrrhocoris apterus L. (Heteroptera, Pyrrhocoridae), Moscow Univ. Biol. Sci. Bull., 2007, 62, 186–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Michelsen A., Fink F., Gogala M., Traue D., Plants as transmission channels for insect vibrational songs, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 1982, 11, 269–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Čokl A., ZoroviĆ M., Millar J.G., Vibrational communication along plants by the stink bugs Nezara viridula and Murgantia histrionica, Behav. Processes, 2007, 75, 40–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Čokl A., Nardi C., Bento J.M.S., Hirose E., Panizzi A.R., Transmission of stridulatory signals of the burrower bugs, Scaptocoris castanea and Scaptocoris carvalhoi (Heteroptera: Cydnidae) through the soil and soybean, Physiol. Entomol., 2006, 31, 371–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Čokl A., Stink bug interaction with host plants during communication, J. Insect Physiol., 2008, 54, 1113–1124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Čokl A., ZoroviĆ M., Žunič A., Virant-Doberlet M., Tuning of host plants with vibratory songs of Nezara viridula L. (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae), J. Exp. Biol., 2005, 208, 1481–1488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cocroft R.B., Rodriguez R.L., The behavioral ecology of insect vibrational communication, Bioscience, 2005, 55, 323–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Greenfield M.D., Signalers and Receivers: Mechanisms and Evolution of Arthropod Communication, New York, Oxford University Press, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ewing A.W., Mechanisms of Sound Production, In: Ewing A.W., (Ed.), Arthropod Bioacoustics, Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  15. Markl H., Vibrational Communication, In: Huber F., Markl H., (Eds.), Neuroethology and Behavioral Physiology: Roots and Growing Points, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, Springer Berlag, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cremer L., Heckl M., Petersson B.A.T., Structureborne sound: structural vibrations and sound radiation at audio frequencies, Berlin, Springer, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  17. Casas J., Magal C., Sueur J., Dispersive and nondispersive waves through plants: implications for arthropod vibratory communication, Proc. Roy. Soc. B., 2007, 274, 1087–1092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cocroft R.B., Shugart K.T., Konrad K.T., Tibbs K., Variation of plant substrates and its consequences for insect vibrational communication, Ethology, 2006, 112, 779–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. McNett G.D., Miles R.N., Homentcovschi D., Cocroft R.B., A method for two-dimensional characterization of animal vibrational signals transmitted along plant stems, J. Comp. Physiol. A., 2006, 192, 1245–1251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Elias D.O., Mason A.C., Hoy R.R., The effect of substrate on the efficacy of seismic courtship signal transmission in the jumping spider Habronattus dossenus (Aranea: Salticidae), J. Exp. Biol., 2004, 207, 4105–4110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Henry C.S., Acoustic communication in neuropterid insects, In: Drosopoulos S., Claridge M.F., (Eds.), Insect Sound and Communication: Physiology, Behavior, Ecology and Evolution, Boca Raton London New York, CRC Taylor & Francis Group, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  22. Čokl A., Virant-Doberlet M., Communication with substrate-borne signals in small plant-dwelling insects, Annu. Rev. Entomol., 2003, 48, 29–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Virant-Doberlet M., Čokl A., Vibrational communication in insects, Neotrop. Entomol., 2004, 33, 121–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. De Luca P.A., Morris G.K., Courtship communication in meadow katydids: female preference for large male vibrations, Behaviour, 1998, 135, 777–793

    Google Scholar 

  25. Čokl A., Functional properties of vibroreceptors in the legs of Nezara viridula (L.) (Heteroptera, Pentatomidae), J. Comp. Physiol., 1983, 150, 261–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Virant-Doberlet M., Čokl A., ZoroviĆ M., Use of substrate vibrations for orientation: from behaviour to physiology, In: Drosopoulos S., Claridge M.F., (Eds.), Insect Sound and Communication: Physiology, Behavior, Ecology and Evolution, Boca Raton London New York, CRC Taylor & Francis Group, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  27. Čokl A., Doberlet-Virant M., ZoroviĆ M., Sense organs involved in the vibratory communication of bugs, In: Drosopoulos S., Claridge M.F., (Eds.), Insect Sound and Communication: Physiology, Behavior, Ecology and Evolution, Boca Raton London New York, CRC Taylor & Francis Group, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  28. Barth F.G., A Spider’s World: Senses and behavior, Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  29. Casas J., Bacher S., Tautz J., Meyhöfer R., Pierre D., Leaf vibrations and air movements in a leafminerparasitoid system, Biol. Control, 1998, 11, 147–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kirchner W.H., Hearing in honeybees: the mechanical response of the bee’s antenna to near field sound, J. Comp. Physiol. A, 1994, 175, 261–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Shaw S.R., Detection of airborne sound by a cockroach “vibration detector”. A possible missing link in insect auditory evolution, J. Exp. Biol., 1994, 193, 13–47

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrej Čokl.

About this article

Cite this article

Čokl, A., Žunič, A. & Millar, J.G. Transmission of Podisus maculiventris tremulatory signals through plants. cent.eur.j.biol. 4, 585–594 (2009). https://doi.org/10.2478/s11535-009-0043-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11535-009-0043-z

Keywords

Navigation