Skip to main content
Log in

Trends in American Public Opinion: A Cohort Analysis of Shifting Attitudes from 1972–1990

  • Published:
Behaviormetrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studies of sociopolitical attitudinal shifts toward increased conservatism have failed to adequately distinguish among period, age and cohort effects. Using a modified Bayesian cohort procedure and data from the General Social Survey, we disentangle these effects and test 3 hypotheses derived from past literature. Results show that period shifts have occurred in the conservative direction for variables concerning moral issues and crime, but in the liberal direction for civil liberties and women’s rights-Increased age is associated with increased conservatism with regard to women’s rights and homosexuality, but otherwise, does not lead to increased conservatism. Cohort effects show that more recent cohorts are increasingly conservative in their attitudes toward drug use and homosexuality, but are otherwise relatively liberal

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akaike, H. (1980). Likelihood and the Bayes Procedure. In J.M. Bernardo, M.B. DeGroot, D.V. Lindley, and A.F.M. Smith (Eds), Bayesian Statistics (pp. 143–166). Valencia: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachman, J.G., Johnston L.D., & O’Malley P.M. (1986). Monitoring the Future. Survey Research Center: University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J.C. & Strate, J. (1981). Are old people conservative?, Gerontologist, 21, 580–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, S.J. (1983). Aging and changes in attitudes about the women’s liberation movement, International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 16, 43–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danigelis, N. & Cutler, S.J. (1991a). Cohort trends in attitudes about law and order: who’s leading the conservative wave?, Public Opinion Quarterly, 55, 24–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danigelis, N. & Cutler, S.J. (1991b). An inter-cohort comparison of changes in racial attitudes, Research on Aging, 13, 383–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Exter, T. & Barber, F. (1986). The age of conservatism, American Demographics, 8, 30–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fendrich, J.M. & Turner, R.W. (1989). The transition from student to adult politics, Social Forces, 67, 1049–1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fienberg, S.E. & Mason W.M. (1979). Identification and estimation of age-period-cohort models in the analysis of discrete archival data. In K.F. Schuessler (Ed), Sociological Methodology (pp. 1–67), San Francisco: Josey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleishman, J.A. (1986). Types of political attitude structures: results of a cluster analysis, Public Opinion Quarterly, 50, 371–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girvin, B. (1988). The Transition of Contemporary Conservatism. Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, N.D. (1974). Aging and conservatism, Annals of American Academy of Political and Social Science, 414, 176–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, N.D. (1987). Social trends in the United States: evidence from sample surveys, Public Opinion Quarterly, 51, 109–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greeley, A.M. & Hout, M. (1988). Musical chairs: patterns of denominational change, Sociology and Social Research, 72, 75–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guth, J.L. (1983). The new Christian right. In R.C. Liebman and R. Wuthnow (Eds), The New Christian Right (pp. 31–45), New York: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastings, P.K. & Hoge, D.R. (1986). Religious and moral attitude trends among college students, 1948–1984, Social Forces, 65, 370–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Himmelstein, J.L. (1990). To the Right: The Transformation of American Conservatism. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoke, D. (1979). Stratification and the dimensions of American political orientations, Amencan Journal of Political Science, 23, 772–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, E.C. (1983). The Brittle Mandate Extended: an in-depth examination of the voters’ 1982 verdict, Public Affairs Review, 4, 23–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, K.O., Mason, W.M., Winsborough, H.H., & Poole, W.K. (1973). Some methodological issues in the cohort analysis of archival data, American Sociological Review, 38, 242–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, K.O. & Lu, Y.H. (1988). Attitudes toward women’s familiar roles: changes in the United States, 1977–1985, Gender and Society, 2, 39–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBroom, W.H. & Reed, F.W. (1990). Recent trends in conservatism: evidence of non-unitary pattrens, Sociological Focus, 23, 355–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A.S. (1992). Are self-proclaimed ’conservatives’ really conservative? Trends in attitudes and self-identification among the young, Social Forces, 71, 195–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A.S. (1994). Dynamic indicators of self-proclaimed conservatism, Sociological Quarterly, 35, 175–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, T. (1986). Bayesian cohort models for general cohort table analyses, Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 32, 353–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, T. (1995). Bayesian logit cohort models with age-by-period interaction effects and an over-dispersion parameter and their application to the data from the study of the Japanese national character, Proceedings of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 43, 99–119. (In Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Peele, G. (1984). Revival and Reaction. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, M.W. (1973). Aging and cohort succession: interpretations and misinterpretations, Public Opinion Quarterly, 37, 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roozen, D.A., McKinney, W., & Thompson, W. (1990). The ‘Big Chill’ generation warms to worship, Review of Religious Research, 31, 314–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasaki, M. & Suzuki, T. (1987). Changes in religious commitment in the United States, Holland and Japan, American Journal of Sociology, 92, 1055–1076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T.W. (1990). Liberal and conservative trends in the United States since World War II, Public Opinion Quarterly, 54, 479–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorman, G. (1985). The conservative revolution in America. Translated by Jane Kaplan. Chicago: Regnery.

  • Steinfels, P. (1979). The Neoconservatives, New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stouffer, S.A. (1955). Communism, Conformity and Civil Liberties. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeisel, H. & Gallup, A.M. (1989). Death penalty sentiment in the United States, Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 5, 285–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan S. Miller.

About this article

Cite this article

Miller, A.S., Nakamura, T. Trends in American Public Opinion: A Cohort Analysis of Shifting Attitudes from 1972–1990. Behaviormetrika 24, 179–191 (1997). https://doi.org/10.2333/bhmk.24.179

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2333/bhmk.24.179

Key Words and Phrases

Navigation