Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The American oyster as a coastal zone pollution monitor: A pilot study

  • Published:
Estuaries Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Condition Index [(dry meat weight)(100)/(internal cavity volume)] has been analyzed and compared in the American oyster,Crassostrea virginica, from two South Carolina estuaries, one of which was considered polluted by coliform bacteria standards. During the warmer months, oysters from the unpolluted habitat showed a consistently and significantly higher Condition Index. Best fit and power function regressions of Condition Index on total coliform bacteria levels conform with previously cited effects of pollutants on oysters. Condition Index droped markedly as the incidence of total coliforms increased toward levels of 100 per 100 ml of water. Our results and the known sensitivity of oysters to a spectrum of pollutants suggest that their condition could be used to monitor waterborne pollution in coastal zone areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  • American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association and Water Pollution Control Federation. 1971. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 13th Edition. New York, 834 p.

  • Bartsch, A. F., R. J. Callaway, R. A. Wagner, andC. E. Woelke. 1967. Technical approaches toward evaluating estuarine pollution problems, p. 693–700.In G. Lauff (ed.), Estuaries. AAAS, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battle, J. D. 1891. An investigation of the coast waters of South Carolina, with reference to oyster-culture.Bull. U.S. Fish Comm. for 1890:303–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaven, G. F. 1946. Effect of Susquehanna River stream flow on Chesapeake Bay salinities and history of past oyster mortalities on upper bay bars.Proc. Natl. Shellfish. Assoc. 38:38–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlucci, A. F., andD. Pramer. 1960. An evaluation of factors affecting the survival ofEscherichia coli in seawater. II. Salinity, pH, and nutrients.Appl. Microbiol. 8:247.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clague, J. A., andC. Almario. 1952. Bacteriological studies of Philippine fishery products.Water Pollut. Abstr. 25:167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, P. A., andM. R. Tripp. 1975. Accumulation, tissue distribution, and elimination of203HgCl2 and CH3 203HgCl in the tissue of the American oyster,Crassostrea virginica.Mar. Biol. 31:321–334.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davids, C. 1964. The influence of suspensions of microorganisms of different concentrations on the pumping and retention of food by the musselMytilus edulis.Neth. J. Sea Res. 2:233–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, B. 1891. The physical and biological character of the natural oyster-grounds of South Carolina.Bull. U.S. Fish Comm. for 1890:335–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Protection Agency. 1972. A bacteriological survey of the Little River, South Carolina-Calabash Creek, North Carolina area. Region IV E.P.A. Agency Report. Atlanta, Georgia, 59 p.

  • Fisher, L. M., andJ. E. Acker. 1935. Bacteriological examination of oysters and waters from Narraganset Bay.Sewage Wks. J. 7:727.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fugate, K. J., D. O. Oliver, andM. T. Hatch. 1975. Enteroviruses and potential bacterial indicators in Gulf Coast oysters.J. Milk Technol. 38:100–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galstsoff, P. S. 1964. The American oyster,Crassostrea Virginica Gmelin.U.S., Fish Wildl. Serv., Fish. Bull. 64:480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galtsoff, P. S., andW. Arcisz. 1954. Observations on the rate of propulsion of water and retention of coliform bacteria by the oyster.Proc. Natl. Shellfish. Assoc. 44:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haven, D. 1961. Seasonal cycle of condition index of oysters in the York and Rappahannock Rivers.Proc. Natl. Shellfish. Assoc. 52:42–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ito, S., andT. Imai. 1955. Ecology of oyster beds. I. On the decline of productivity due to repeated culture.Tohoku J. Agric. Res. 5:251–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korringa, P. 1952. Recent advances in oyster biology.Q. Rev. Biol. 27:266–365.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loosanoff, V. L., andJ. B. Engle. 1942. Accumulation and discharge of spawn by oysers living at different depths.Biol. Bull. 82:413–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loosanoff, V. L., andJ. B. Engle. 1947. Effects of different concentrations of microorganisms on the feeding of oysters (O. virginica).U.S. Fish. Wildl. Serv., Fish. Bull. 52:31–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, J. I., P. R. Parrish, J. M. Patrick, Jr., andJ. Forrester. 1972. Effects of the polychlorinated biphenyl Arochlorŗ 1254 on the American oysterCrassostrea virginica.Mar. Biol. 17:209–214.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lunz, G. R. 1940. The annelid worm,Polydora, as an oyster pest.Science 92:310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lunz, G. R. 1941.Polydora, a pest in South Carolina oysters.J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc. 57:273–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf, T. G., andW. C. Stiles. 1968. The accumulation of enteric viruses by the oyster,Crassostrea virginica.J. Infect. Dis. 115:68–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. 1971. Role of predators in the reversal of imbalances in microbial ecosystems.Nature (London) 230:257–258.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Newlands, J. A., andG. C. Ham. 1910. Sanitary inspection of oyster grounds in New Haven Harbor.Chem. Abstr. 5:2136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prescott, S. C., C-E. A. Winslow, andM. H. McCrady. 1945. Water Bacteriology, 6th Edition. John Wiley, New York, 368 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reish, D. J. 1955. The relation of polychaetous annelids to harbor pollution.Pub. Health Rep. (Washington) 70:1168–1174.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ruddy, G. M., S. Y. Feng, andG. S. Campbell. 1975. The effect of prolonged exposure to elevated temperatures on the biochemical constituents, gonadal development, and shell deposition of the American oysterCrassostrea virginica.Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 51B:157–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, G. I., and D. P. Middaugh. 1978. Seasonal chronic toxicity of chlorination to the American oyster,Crassostrea virginica, p. 311–328.In Ann Arbor Science Publ. Inc., Water Chlorination: Vol. 2, Environmental Impact and Health Effects. Ann Arbor, Michigan.

  • Scott, G. I., andW. B. Vernberg. 1979. Co-occurring chlorine produced oxidants in seawater and their effect on the growth, survival, and physiology of the American oyster,Crassostrea virginica (Gmelin). Evidence for synergistic effects with seasonal temperature stress, p. 415–435.In W. B. Vernberg, F. Thurberg, A. Calabreese, and F. J. Vernberg (eds.), Marine Pollution: Functional Responses. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenore, K. R., andW. M. Dunstan. 1973. Comparison of feeding and biodeposition of three bivalves at different food levels.Mar. Biol. 21:190–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaccaro, R., M. Briggs, C. Carey, andB. Ketchum. 1950. Viability ofE. coli in seawater.Am. J. Public. Health 40:1257.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ruddy, G. M., S. Y. Feng, andG. S. Campbell. 1975. The effect of prolonged exposure to elevated temperatures on the biochemical constituents, gonadal development, and shell deposition of the American oysterCrassostrea virginica.Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 51B:157–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westley, R. E. 1961. Selection and evaluation of a quantitative measurement of oyster condition.Proc. Natl. Shellfish. Assoc. 50:145–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widdows, J., P. Fieth, andC. M. Worrall. 1979. Relations between seston, available food, and feeding activity in the common musselMytilus edulis.Mar. Biol. 50:195–207.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Contribution No. 362 of the Belle W. Baruch Institute for Marine Biology and Coastal Research; Contribution No. 403 of the Gulf Breeze Environmental Research Laboratory.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scott, G.I., Lawrence, D.R. The American oyster as a coastal zone pollution monitor: A pilot study. Estuaries 5, 40–46 (1982). https://doi.org/10.2307/1352215

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1352215

Keywords

Navigation