Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative Effectiveness of Topical Calcineurin Inhibitors in Adult Patients with Atopic Dermatitis

  • Review Article
  • Published:
American Journal of Clinical Dermatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by extreme pruritis and lichenified papules and plaques that may begin in or persist into adulthood. Topical corticosteroids are firstline prescription therapy for AD; they are efficacious and have a well established safety profile. The topical calcineurin inhibitors tacrolimus and pimecrolimus were approved by the US FDA in 2000 and 2001, respectively, as second-line topical therapy for AD. This review evaluates the available studies on the comparative effectiveness, safety, cost, and impact on quality of life of topical corticosteroids and topical calcineurin inhibitors for the treatment of adult AD.

Tacrolimus was found to be as effective as class III–V topical corticosteroids for AD of the trunk and extremities, and more effective than low-potency class VI or VII corticosteroids for AD of the face or neck. Pimecrolimus was less effective than both tacrolimus and low-potency topical corticosteroids for moderate to severe AD. The short-term safety studies found that, compared with topical corticosteroid-treated adults, patients treated with topical calcineurin inhibitors had an increased frequency of application-site reactions, an equivalent infection risk, and a decreased risk of skin atrophy. The long-term safety of topical calcineurin inhibitors remains under investigation. Currently published studies that evaluated the comparative cost and quality-of-life effects compared tacrolimus with less potent topical corticosteroids despite the availability of equivalent potency corticosteroids. Further cost and quality-of-life studies are needed that compare topical calcineurin inhibitors with stronger classes of topical corticosteroids over longer time periods.

The available clinical trials data do not suggest an efficacy advantage for topical calcineurin inhibitors over topical corticosteroids in adults with AD of the trunk and extremities, and there is not yet adequate evidence to support topical calcineurin inhibitors as first-line therapy for adult AD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Table I
Table II

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Leung DY, Bieber T. Atopic dermatitis. Lancet 2003 Jan 11; 361 (9352): 151–60

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hanifin JM, Cooper KD, Ho VC, et al. Guidelines of care for atopic dermatitis, developed in accordance with the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD)/American Academy of Dermatology Association “Administrative Regulations for Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines”. J Am Acad Dermatol 2004 Mar; 50 (3): 391–404

    Google Scholar 

  3. US FDA. New drug application 21-202 approval letter [online]. Available from URL: (http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2001/21-302_ELIDEL_Approv.pdf) [Accessed 2011 Apr 3]

  4. US FDA. New drug application 50-777 approval letter [online]. Available from URL: (http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/appletter/2000/50777ltr.pdf [Accessed 2011 Apr 3]

  5. Van Leent EJ, Graber M, Thurston M, et al. Effectiveness of the ascomycin macrolactam SDZ ASM 981 in the topical treatment of atopic dermatitis. Arch Dermatol 1998 Jul; 134 (7): 805–9

    Google Scholar 

  6. Meurer M, Folster-Holst R, Wozel G, et al. Pimecrolimus cream in the longterm management of atopic dermatitis in adults: a six-month study. Dermatology 2002; 205 (3): 271–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ruzicka T, Bieber T, Schopf E, et al. A short-term trial of tacrolimus ointment for atopic dermatitis: European Tacrolimus Multicenter Atopic Dermatitis Study Group. New Engl J Med 1997 Sep 18; 337 (12): 816–21

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cork MJ, Danby SG, Vasilopoulos Y, et al. Epidermal barrier dysfunction in atopic dermatitis. J Invest Dermatol 2009 Aug; 129 (8): 1892–908

    Google Scholar 

  9. Leung DY, Hanifin JM, Charlesworth EN, et al. Disease management of atopic dermatitis: a practice parameter. Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters, representing the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, the American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, and the Joint Council of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology. Work Group on Atopic Dermatitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 1997 Sep; 79 (3): 197–211

    Google Scholar 

  10. Simpson EL. Atopic dermatitis: a review of topical treatment options. Curr Med Res Opin 2010 Mar; 26 (3): 633–40

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tomi NS, Luger TA. The treatment of atopic dermatitis with topical immunomodulators. Clin Dermatol 2003 May-Jun; 21 (3): 215–24

    Google Scholar 

  12. Akhavan A, Rudikoff D. The treatment of atopic dermatitis with systemic immunosuppressive agents. Clin Dermatol 2003 May-Jun; 21 (3): 225–40

    Google Scholar 

  13. Breuer K, Werfel T, Kapp A. Safety and efficacy of topical calcineurin inhibitors in the treatment of childhood atopic dermatitis. Am J Clin Dermatol 2005; 6 (2): 65–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Abramovits W, Fleischer Jr AB, Jaracz E, et al. Adult patients with moderate atopic dermatitis: tacrolimus ointment versus pimecrolimus cream. J Drugs Dermatol 2008 Dec; 7 (12): 1153–8

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fleischer Jr AB, Abramovits W, Breneman D, et al. Tacrolimus ointment is more effective than pimecrolimus cream in adult patients with moderate to very severe atopic dermatitis. J Dermatol Treat 2007; 18 (3): 151–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Paller AS, Lebwohl M, Fleischer Jr AB, et al. Tacrolimus ointment is more effective than pimecrolimus cream with a similar safety profile in the treatment of atopic dermatitis: results from 3 randomized, comparative studies. J Am Acad Dermatol 2005 May; 52 (5): 810–22

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mandelin J, Remitz A, Virtanen H, et al. One-year treatment with 0.1% tacrolimus ointment versus a corticosteroid regimen in adults with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis: a randomized, double-blind, comparative trial. Acta Derm Venereol 2010 Mar; 90 (2): 170–4

    Google Scholar 

  18. Doss N, Reitamo S, Dubertret L, et al. Superiority of tacrolimus 0.1%ointment compared with fluticasone 0.005% in adults with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis of the face: results from a randomized, double-blind trial. Br J Dermatol 2009 Aug; 161 (2): 427–34

    Google Scholar 

  19. Neumann E, Amtage D, Bruckner-Tuderman L, et al. A single-center openlabel long-term comparison of tacrolimus ointment and topical corticosteroids for treatment of atopic dermatitis. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2008 Jul; 6 (7): 548–53

    Google Scholar 

  20. Reitamo S, Ortonne JP, Sand C, et al. A multicentre, randomized, doubleblind, controlled study of long-term treatment with 0.1%tacrolimus ointment in adults with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 2005 Jun; 152 (6): 1282–9

    Google Scholar 

  21. Reitamo S, Rustin M, Ruzicka T, et al. Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus ointment compared with that of hydrocortisone butyrate ointment in adult patients with atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2002 Mar; 109 (3): 547–55

    Google Scholar 

  22. FK506 Ointment Study Group. Phase III comparative study of FK506 ointment versus betamethasone valerate ointment in atopic dermatitis (trunk/extremities) [in Japanese]. Nishinihon J Derm 1997; 59: 870–9

    Google Scholar 

  23. FK506 Ointment Study Group. Phase III comparative study of FK506 ointment versus alclometasone dipropionate ointment in atopic dermatitis (face/neck) [in Japanese]. Hihuka Kiyo [Dermatology Bulletin] 1997; 92: 277–82

  24. Luger TA, Lahfa M, Folster-Holst R, et al. Long-term safety and tolerability of pimecrolimus cream 1%and topical corticosteroids in adults with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. J Dermatol Treat 2004 Jun; 15 (3): 169–78

    Google Scholar 

  25. Luger T, Van Leent EJ, Graeber M, et al. SDZ ASM 981: an emerging safe and effective treatment for atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 2001 Apr; 144 (4): 788–94

    Google Scholar 

  26. Qureshi AA, Fischer MA. Topical calcineurin inhibitors for atopic dermatitis: balancing clinical benefit and possible risks. Arch Dermatol 2006 May; 142 (5): 633–7

    Google Scholar 

  27. US FDA. FDA approves updated labeling with boxed warning and medication guide for two eczema drugs, Elidel and Protopic [online]. Available from URL: (http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/PostmarketDrugSafetyInformationforPatientsandProviders/ucm153941.htm [Accessed 2011 Nov 21]

  28. Bieber T. Atopic dermatitis. Ann Dermatol 2010 May; 22 (2): 125–37

    Google Scholar 

  29. Arellano FM, Wentworth CE, Arana A, et al. Risk of lymphoma following exposure to calcineurin inhibitors and topical steroids in patients with atopic dermatitis. J Invest Dermatol 2007 Apr; 127 (4): 808–16

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang Y, Holford TR, Leaderer B, et al. Prior medical conditions and medication use and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in Connecticut United States women. Cancer Causes Control 2004 May; 15 (4): 419–28

    Google Scholar 

  31. Soderberg KC, Hagmar L, Schwartzbaum J, et al. Allergic conditions and risk of hematological malignancies in adults: a cohort study. BMC Public Health 2004 Nov 4; 4: 51

    Google Scholar 

  32. Margolis DJ, Hoffstad O, Bilker W. Lack of association between exposure to topical calcineurin inhibitors and skin cancer in adults. Dermatology 2007; 214 (4): 289–95

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Hashizume H, Yagi H, Ohshima A, et al. Comparable risk of herpes simplex virus infection between topical treatments with tacrolimus and corticosteroids in adults with atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 2006 Jun; 154 (6): 1204–6

    Google Scholar 

  34. Reitamo S, Rissanen J, Remitz A, et al. Tacrolimus ointment does not affect collagen synthesis: results of a single-center randomized trial. J Invest Dermatol 1998 Sep; 111 (3): 396–8

    Google Scholar 

  35. Queille-Roussel C, Paul C, Duteil L, et al. The new topical ascomycin derivative SDZ ASM 981 does not induce skin atrophy when applied to normal skin for 4 weeks: a randomized, double-blind controlled study. Br J Dermatol 2001 Mar; 144 (3): 507–13

    Google Scholar 

  36. Poole CD, Chambers C, Allsopp R, et al. Quality of life and health-related utility analysis of adults with moderate and severe atopic dermatitis treated with tacrolimus ointment vs. topical corticosteroids. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2010 Jun; 24 (6): 674–8

    Google Scholar 

  37. Burkhart CN, Burkhart CG. Pilot study of patient satisfaction with nonfluorinated topical steroids compared with a topical immunomodulator in atopiform dermatitis. Int J Dermatol 2004 Mar; 43 (3): 215–9

    Google Scholar 

  38. Taneja C, Antaya RJ, Berger A, et al. Cost-effectiveness of tacrolimus ointment versus pimecrolimus cream in adults with atopic dermatitis. J Drugs Dermatol 2010 Apr; 9 (4): 372–6

    Google Scholar 

  39. Delea TE, Gokhale M, Makin C, et al. Administrative claims analysis of utilization and costs of care in health plan members with atopic dermatitis who had prior use of a topical corticosteroid and who initiate therapy with pimecrolimus or tacrolimus. J Manag Care Pharm 2007 May; 13 (4): 349–59

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hjelmgren J, Svensson A, Jorgensen ET, et al. Cost-effectiveness of tacrolimus ointment vs. standard treatment in patients with moderate and severe atopic dermatitis: a health-economic model simulation based on a patient survey and clinical trial data. Br J Dermatol 2007 May; 156 (5): 913–21

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ellis CN, Drake LA, Prendergast MM, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of tacrolimus ointment versus high-potency topical corticosteroids in adults with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003 Apr; 48 (4): 553–63

    Google Scholar 

  42. Pitt M, Garside R, Stein K. A cost-utility analysis of pimecrolimus vs. topical corticosteroids and emollients for the treatment of mild and moderate atopic eczema. Br J Dermatol 2006 Jun; 154 (6): 1137–46

    Google Scholar 

  43. Finlay AY, Khan GK. Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI): a simple practicalmeasure for routine clinical use. Clin Exp Dermatol 1994 May; 19 (3): 210–6

    Google Scholar 

  44. Whalley D, McKenna SP, Dewar AL, et al. A new instrument for assessing quality of life in atopic dermatitis: international development of the Quality of Life Index for Atopic Dermatitis (QoLIAD). Br J Dermatology 2004 Feb; 150 (2): 274–83s

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

No sources of funding were used to prepare this article. AAQ serves as a consultant to Novartis and the US Center for Disease Control. HCF has no conflicts of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abrar A. Qureshi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frankel, H.C., Qureshi, A.A. Comparative Effectiveness of Topical Calcineurin Inhibitors in Adult Patients with Atopic Dermatitis. Am J Clin Dermatol 13, 113–123 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2165/11597780-000000000-00000

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/11597780-000000000-00000

Keywords

Navigation