Skip to main content
Log in

Antibacterial Therapy for Acute Group A Streptococcal Pharyngotonsillitis

Short-Course Versus Traditional 10-Day Oral Regimens

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this review is to examine the use of short-course antibacterial therapy of group A β-hemolytic streptococcal (GABHS) pharyngotonsillitis, compared with traditional 10-day therapy. In preparing this paper we reviewed the medical literature of studies comparing 10 days of penicillin with shorter courses of antibacterial therapy.

Short-course therapy of 6 days of amoxicillin, 4 to 5 days of cephalosporins, and 5 days of azithromycin was found to be as, or more effective than traditional 10-day penicillin therapy. The benefits of short-course therapy include superior compliance and adherence, lower incidence of adverse effects, less effect on the bacterial flora, improved patient and parent satisfaction, and lower drug costs.

In conclusion, short courses of amoxicillin, cephalosporins, and macrolides provide superior or equal efficacy to a 10-day course of penicillin therapy in the treatment of GABHS pharyngotonsillitis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Table I
Table II
Table III
Table IV

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kaplan EL. The resurgence of group A streptococcal infections and their sequelae. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1991; 10: 55–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pichichero ME. Cephalosporins are superior to penicillin for treatment of streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis: is the difference worth it. Pediatric Infect Dis J 1993; 12: 268–74

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Denny FW, Wannamaker LW, Brink WR, et al. Prevention of rheumatic fever: treatment of the preceding streptococcic infection. JAMA 1950; 143: 151–3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wannamaker LW, Rammelkamp Jr CH, Denny FW, et al. Prophylaxis of acute rheumatic fever by treatment of the preceding streptococcal infection with various amounts of depot penicillin. Am J Med 1951; 10: 673–95

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Randolph MF, Gerber MA, DeMeo KK, et al. Effect of antibiotic therapy on the clinical course of streptococcal pharyngitis. J Pediatr 1985; 106: 870–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Krober MS, Bass JW, Michels GN. Streptococcal pharyngitis: placebo-controlled double-blind evaluation of clinical response to penicillin therapy. JAMA 1985; 253: 1271–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nelson JD. The effect of penicillin therapy on the symptoms and signs of streptococcal pharyngitis. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1984; 3: 10–3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Brink WR, Rammelkamp Jr CH, Denny FW, et al. Effect of penicillin and aureomycin on the natural course of streptococcal tonsillitis and pharyngitis. Am J Med 1951; 10: 300–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Catanzaro FJ, Stetson CA, Morris AJ, et al. The role of the Streptococcus in the pathogenesis of rheumatic fever. Am J Med 1954; 17: 749–56

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bisno AL, Gerber MA, Gwaltney Jr JM, et al. Diagnosis and management of group A streptococcal pharyngitis: a practice guideline. Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 1997; 25: 574–83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bisno AL, Stevens D. Streptococcus pyogenes. In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R, editors. Principles and practice of infectious diseases. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 2000: 2101–16

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kaplan EI, Gerber MA. Group A streptococcal infections. In: Feigin RD, Cherry JD, editors. Textbook of pediatric infectious diseases. 4th ed. Philadelphia (PA): WB Saunders, 1998: 1076–84

    Google Scholar 

  13. Committee on Infectious Diseases of the American Academy of Pediatrics. 1997 red book: report of the committee on infectious diseases. 24th ed. Elk Grove Village (IL): American Academy of Pediatrics, 1997: 483–94

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dajani A, Taubert K, Ferrieri P, et al. Treatment of acute streptococcal pharyngitis and prevention of rheumatic fever: a statement for health professionals. Committee on Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease of the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, the American Heart Association. Pediatrics 1995; 96: 758–64

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Siegel AC, Johnson EE, Stollerman GH. Controlled studies of streptococcal pharyngitis in a pediatric population (I): factors related to the attack rate of rheumatic fever. N Engl J Med 1961; 265: 559–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chamovitz R, Catanzaro FJ, Stetson CA, et al. Prevention of rheumatic fever by treatment of previous streptococcal infections (1): evaluation of benzathine penicillin G. N Engl J Med 1954; 251: 466–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Frank PF, Stollerman GH, Miller LF. Protection of a military population from rheumatic fever: routine administration of benzathine penicillin G to healthy individuals. JAMA 1965; 193: 775–83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wood HF, Feinstein AR, Taranta A, et al. Rheumatic fever in children and adolescents: a long-term epidemiologic study of subsequent prophylaxis, streptococcal infections, and clinical sequelae (III): comparative effectiveness of three prophylaxis regimens in preventing streptococcal infections and rheumatic recurrences. Ann Intern Med 1964; 60Suppl. 5: 31–46

    Google Scholar 

  19. Coonan KM, Kaplan EL. In vitro susceptibility of recent North American group A streptococcal isolates to eleven oral antibiotics. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1994; 13: 630–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Macris MJ, Hartman N, Murray B, et al. Studies of the continuing susceptibility of group A streptococcal strains to penicillin during eight decades. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1998; 17: 377–81

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gerber MA. Antibiotic resistance in group A streptococci. Pediatr Clin North Am 1995; 42: 539–51

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Van Asselt GJ, Mouton RP, Van Boven CP. Penicillin tolerance and treatment failure in group A streptococcal pharyngotonsillitis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1996; 15: 107–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Brook I. Role of β-lactamase-producing bacteria in the persistence of streptococcal tonsillar infection. Rev Infect Dis 1984; 6: 601–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Brook I. Role of β-lactamase-producing bacteria in the failure of penicillin to eradicate group A streptococci. Pediatr Infect Dis 1985; 4: 491–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Brook I, Yocum P, Friedman EM. Aerobic and anaerobic bacteria in tonsils of children with recurrent tonsillitis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1981; 90: 261–3

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Reilly S, Timmis P, Beeden AG, et al. Possible role of the anaerobe in tonsillitis. J Clin Pathol 1981; 34: 542–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Tuner K, Nord CE. β-Lactamase-producing anaerobic bacteria in recurrent tonsillitis. J Antimicrob Chemother 1982; 10: 153–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kielmovitch IH, Keleti G, Bluestone CD, et al. Microbiology of obstructive tonsillar hypertrophy and recurrent tonsillitis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989; 115: 721–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Brook I, Yocum P. Quantitative measurement of β-lactamase level in tonsils of children with recurrent tonsillitis. Acta Otolaryngol Scand 1984; 98: 446–60

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1988. WHO technical report series no. 764

  31. Pichichero ME, Cohen R. Shortened course of antibiotic therapy for acute otitis media, sinusitis and tonsillopharyngitis. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1997; 16: 680–95

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ballow CH. Cost considerations in oral antibiotic therapy. Adv Ther 1995; 12: 199–206

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Mohler DN, Wallin DG, Dreyfus EG. Studies in the home treatment of streptococcal disease (I): failure of patients to take penicillin by mouth as prescribed. N Engl J Med 1955; 252: 1116–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Charney E, Bynum R, Eldredge D, et al. How well do patients take oral penicillin: a collaborative study in private practice. Pediatrics 1967; 40: 188–95

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Green JL, Ray SP, Charney E. Recurrence rate of streptococcal pharyngitis related to oral penicillin. J Pediatr 1969; 75: 292–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Wannamaker LW, Denny FW, Perry WD, et al. The effect of penicillin prophylaxis on streptococcal disease rates and the carrier state. N Engl J Med 1953; 249: 1–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Breese BB. Treatment of beta hemolytic streptococcal infections in the home: relative value of available methods. JAMA 1953; 152: 10–4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Schwartz RH, Wientzen Jr RL, Pedreira F, et al. Penicillin V for group V streptococcal pharyngitis: a randomized trial of seven vs ten days’ therapy. JAMA 1981; 246: 1790–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Gerber MA, Randolph MF, Chanatry J, et al. Five vs ten days of penicillin V therapy for streptococcal pharyngitis. Am J Dis Child 1987; 141: 224–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Straömberg A, Schwan A, Cars O. Five versus ten days treatment of group A streptococcal pharyngotonsillitis: a randomized controlled clinical trial with phenoxymethyl penicillin and cefadroxil. Scand J Infect Dis 1988; 20: 37–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Bernstein SH, Feldman HA, Harper Jr OF, et al. Observations in Air Force recruits of streptococcal diseases and their control with orally administered penicillin. J Lab Clin Med 1954; 44: 1–13

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Breese BB, Disney FA, Talpey WB. Beta-hemolytic streptococcal illness: comparison of lincomycin, ampicillin, and potassium penicillin G in treatment. Am J Dis Child 1966; 112: 21–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Ström J. A comparison of the effects and side-effects of penicillin V and ampicillin in treatment of scarlet fever. Acta Paediatr Scand 1968; 57: 285–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Stillerman M, Isenberg HD, Moody M. Streptococcal pharyngitis therapy: comparison of cephalexin, phenoxymethyl penicillin, and ampicillin. Am J Dis Child 1972; 123: 457–61

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Stillerman M, Isenberg HD, Facklam RR, et al. Treatment of pharyngitis associated with Group A streptococcus: comparison of amoxicillin and potassium phenoxymethyl penicillin. J Infect Dis 1974; 129: S169–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Breese BB, Disney FA, Talpey WB, et al. Treatment of streptococcal pharyngitis with amoxicillin. J Infect Dis 1974; 129: S178–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Breese BB, Disney FA, Green JL, et al. The treatment of beta hemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis: comparison of amoxicillin, erythromycin estolate, and penicillin V. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1977; 16: 460–3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Shvartzman P, Tabenkin H, Rosentzwaig A, et al. Treatment of streptococcal pharyngitis with amoxicillin once a day. BMJ 1993; 306: 1170–2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Cohen R, Levy C, Doit C, et al. Six-day amoxicillin vs ten-day penicillin V therapy for group A streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1996; 15: 678–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Peyramond D, Portier H, Geslin P, et al. Six-day amoxicillin versus 10-day penicillin V for group A beta-haemolytic streptococcal acute tonsillitis in adults: a French multicentre, open-label, randomized study. The French Study Group Clamorange. Scand J Infect Dis 1996; 28: 497–501

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Rolinson G. Beta lactam antibiotics. J Antimicrob Chemother 1986; 17: 5–36

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Chamovitz R, Rammelkamp Jr CH, Wannamaker LW, et al. The effect of tonsillectomy on the incidence of streptococcal respiratory disease and its complications. Pediatrics 1960; 26: 355–67

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Miller JM, Stancer SL, Massell BF. A controlled study of beta hemolytic streptococcal disease among healthy siblings. Am J Med 1958; 25: 825–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Schalet N, Reen BM, Houser HB. A comparison of penicillin G and penicillin V in treatment of streptococcal sore throat. Am J Med Sci 1958; 235: 183–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Stillerman M, Bernstein SH, Smith ML, et al. Antibiotics in the treatment of beta-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis: factors influencing the results. Pediatrics 1960; 25: 27–34

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Stillerman M, Bernstein SH. Streptococcal pharyngitis therapy. Am J Dis Child 1964; 107: 73–84

    Google Scholar 

  57. Breese BB, Disney FA, Talpey WB. Penicillin in streptococcal infections: total dose and frequency of administration. Am J Dis Child 1965; 110: 125–30

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Shapera RM, Hable KA, Matsen JM. Erythromycin therapy twice daily for streptococcal pharyngitis: controlled comparison with erythromycin or penicillin phenoxymethyl four times daily or penicillin G benzathine. JAMA 1973; 226: 531–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Stillerman M, Isenberg FID, Facklam RR. Streptococcal pharyngitis therapy: comparison of clindamycin palmitate and potassium phenoxymethyl penicillin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1973; 4: 514–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Lester RL, Howie VM, Ploussard JH. Treatment of streptococcal pharyngitis with different antibiotic regimens: observations on the effectiveness of 7-chlorolincomycin on twice-a-day dosage. Clin Pediatr 1974; 13: 239–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Matsen JH, Torstenson O, Siegel SE, et al. Use of available dosage forms of cephalexin in clinical comparison with phenoxymethyl penicillin and benzathine penicillin in the treatment of streptococcal pharyngitis in children. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1974; 6: 501–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Bass JW, Crast FW, Knowles CR, et al. Streptococcal pharyngitis in children: a comparison of four treatment schedules with intramuscular penicillin G benzathine. JAMA 1976; 235: 1112–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Spitzer TG, Harris BA. Penicillin V therapy for streptococcal pharyngitis: comparison of dosage schedules. South Med J 1977; 70: 41–2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Gerber MA, Spadaccina LJ, Wright LL, et al. Twice-daily penicillin in the treatment of streptococcal pharyngitis. Am J Dis Child 1985; 139: 1145–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Portier H, Chavanet P, Gouyon JB, et al. Five-day treatment of pharyngotonsillitis with cefpodoxime proxetil. J Antimicrob Chemother 1990; 26Suppl. E: 79–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Gehanno P, Chiche D. Treatment of the anginas with stretocoque haemolytic beta of group A by the cefuroxime axetil during 4 days: comparative study with the penicillin V during 10 days [in French]. Med Mal Infect 1991; 21: 66–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Milatovic D. Evaluation of cefadroxil penicillin and erythromycin in the treatment of streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1991; 10(10 Suppl.): S61–3

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Portier H, Chavanet P, Waldner-Combernoux A, et al. Five versus ten days treatment of streptococcal pharyngotonsil: a randomized controlled trial comparing cefpodoxime proxetil and phenoxymethyl penicillin. Scand J Infect Dis 1994; 26: 59–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Pichichero ME, Gooch WM, Rodriguez W, et al. Effective short-course treatment of acute group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis: a comparison of five days vs ten days cefpodoxime proxetil vs ten days penicillin VK in children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1994; 148: 1053–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Peyramond D, Tigaud S, Bremard-Oury C, et al. Multicenter comparative trial of cefixime and phenoxymethylpenicillin for group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal tonsillitis. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp 1994; 55Suppl. A: 14–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Dajani AS. Pharyngitis/tonsillitis: European and United States experience with cefpodoxime proxetil. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1995; 14: S7–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Aujard Y, Boucot I, Brahimi N, et al. Comparative efficacy and safety of four-day cefuroxime axetil and ten-day penicillin treatment of group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1995; 14: 295–300

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Carbon C, Chatelin A, Bingen E, et al. A double-blind randomized trial comparing the efficacy and safety of a 5-day course of cefotiam hexetil with that of a 10-day course of penicillin V in adult patients with pharyngitis caused by group A beta-haemolytic streptococci. J Antimicrob Chemother 1995; 35: 843–54

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Adam D, Hostalek U, Tröster K. 5-day cefixime therapy for bacterial pharyngitis and/or tonsillitis: comparison with 10-day penicillin V therapy. Cefixime Study Group. Infection 1995; 23Suppl. 2: S83–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Tack KJ, Hedrick JA, Rothstein E, et al. A study of 5-day cefdinir treatment for streptococcal pharyngitis in children. Arch Pediatr Med 1997; 151: 45–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Tack KJ, Henry DC, Gooch WM, et al. Five-day cefdinir treatment for streptococcal pharyngitis. Cefdinir Pharyngitis Study Group. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1998; 42: 1073–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Adam D, Scholz H, Helmerking M. Comparison of short-course (5 day) cefuroxime axetil with a standard 10 day oral penicillin V regimen in the treatment of tonsillopharyngitis. J Antimicrob Chemother 2000; 45: 23–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Adam D, Scholz H, Helmerking M. Short-course antibiotic treatment of 4782 culture-proven cases of group A streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis and incidence of poststreptococcal sequelae. J Infect Dis 2000; 182: 509–16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Hooten TM. A comparison of azithromycin and penicillin V for the treatment of streptococcal pharyngitis. Am J Med 1991; 91Suppl. 3A: S23–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Hamill J. Multicentre evaluation of azithromycin and penicillin V in the treatment of acute streptococcal pharyngitis and tonsillitis in children. J Antimicrob Chemother 1993; 31Suppl. E: 89–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Still JG. Management of pediatric patients with group A beta-hemolytic Streptococcus pharyngitis: treatment options. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1995; 14: S57–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Pacifico L, Scopetti F, Ranucci A, et al. Comparative efficacy and safety of 3-day azithromycin and 10-day penicillin V treatment of group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis in children. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1996; 40: 1005–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Schaad UB, Heynen G. Evaluation of the efficacy, safety and toleration of azithromycin vs penicillin V in the treatment of acute streptococcal pharyngitis in children: results of a multi-center, open comparative study. The Swiss Tonsillopharyngitis Study Group. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1996; 15: 791–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. O’Doherty B. Azithromycin versus penicillin V in the treatment of paediatric patients with acute streptococcal pharyngitis/tonsillitis. Paediatric Azithromycin Study Group. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1996; 15(9): 718–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Portier H, Lucht F, Lescale O, et al. Josamycin 5 days versus penicillin V 10 days in treatment of the acute anginas to streptocoque beta-haemolytic of group A [in French]. Med Mal Infect 1995; 25: 1005–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Pichichero ME, Margolis PA. A comparison of cephalosporins and penicillins in the treatment of Group A β-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis: a meta-analysis supporting the concept of microbial copathogenicity. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1991; 10: 275–81

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Brook I, Gilmore JD. Evaluation of bacterial interference and beta-lactamase production in management of experimental infection with Group A beta-hemolytic streptococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1993; 37: 1452–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Brook I, Foote PA. Effect of penicillin or cefprozil therapy on tonsillar flora. J Antimicrob Chemother 1997; 40: 725–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Rathore MH, Jenkins SG. Group A beta-hemolytic Streptococcus: issue of resistance. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1993; 12: 354–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Barry AL, Fuchs PC, Brown SD. Macrolide resistance among Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus pyogenes isolates from out-patients in the USA. J Antimicrob Chemother 1997; 40: 139–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Martin JM, Green M, Barbadora KA, et al. Erythromycin-resistant group A streptococci in school children in Pittsburgh. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 1200–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this manuscript. The author has no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Itzhak Brook.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brook, I. Antibacterial Therapy for Acute Group A Streptococcal Pharyngotonsillitis. Pediatr-Drugs 4, 747–754 (2002). https://doi.org/10.2165/00128072-200204110-00006

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00128072-200204110-00006

Keywords

Navigation