Skip to main content
Log in

Azithromycin versus penicillin V in the treatment of paediatric patients with acute streptococcal pharyngitis/tonsillitis

  • Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The efficacy and safety of azithromycin and penicillin V in the treatment of acute streptococcal pharyngitis/tonsillitis in paediatric patients were compared in a double-blind, double-dummy prospective study. A total of 489 children (age range, 2–13 years) were randomized to receive treatment with penicillin V (125–250 mg 4 × daily for 10 days) or azithromycin in an oral suspension (10 or 20 mg/kg 1 × daily for 3 days). Only patients with baseline cultures positive forStreptococcus pyogenes and complete clinical and microbiological assessments at the end of therapy and follow-up one month later were included in the efficacy analysis. A satisfactory clinical response (cure or improvement) was recorded in 99% of the 10 mg/kg azithromycin group, 100% of the 20 mg/kg azithromycin group, and 97% of the penicillin V group at the end of therapy (day 12–14). At the follow-up evaluation (day 28–30), relapse rates in patients cured or improved at the end of therapy were 6%, 5%, and 2%, respectively. Bacteriological eradication rates at the end of therapy were 98% in both azithromycin groups and 92% in patients who received penicillin V (p=0.011); pathogen recurrence was recorded at follow-up in 4% of the 20 mg/kg azithromycin group and in 6% of both the 10 mg/kg azithromycin and penicillin V groups. Treatment-related adverse events, the majority of mild to moderate severity, occurred in 13% of patients in the 20 mg/kg azithromycin group, 9% in the 10 mg/kg azithromycin group, and 5% in the penicillin V group. Azithromycin in a dosage of 10 or 20 mg/kg/day once daily for three days was as safe and effective as penicillin V administered four times daily in the treatment of paediatric patients with acute pharyngitis/tonsillitis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bisno AL:Streptococcus pyogenes. In: Mandell GL, Douglas RG, Bennett JE (ed): Principles and practice of infectious diseases. Churchill Livingstone, New York, 1990, p. 519–1528.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wannamaker WL, Rammelkamp CH, Denny FW, Brink WR, Houser HB, Hahn HO: Prophylaxis of acute rheumatic fever by treatment of the preceding streptococcal infection with various amounts of depot penicillin. American Journal of Medicine 1951, 10: 673–679.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bass JW: Antibiotic management of group A streptococcal pharyngotonsillitis. Paediatric Infectious Disease Journal 1991, 10, Supplement: 10–49.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pichichero ME: Explanations and therapies for penicillin failure in streptococcal pharyngitis. Clinical Pediatrics 1992, 31: 642–649.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim KS, Kaplan EL: Association of penicillin tolerance with failure to eradicate group A streptococci from patients with pharyngitis. Journal of Pediatrics 1985, 107: 642–649.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Raz R, Hamburger S, Flatau E: Clindamycin in the treatment of an outbreak of streptococcal pharyngitis in a kibbutz due to beta-lactamase producing organisms. Journal of Chemotherapy 1990, 2: 182–184.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Colcher IS, Bass JW: Penicillin treatment of streptococcal pharyngitis. A comparison of schedules and the role of specific counselling. Journal of the American Medical Association 1972, 222: 657–659.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pilot MA, Qin XY: Macrolides and gastrointestinal motility. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 1988, 19: 275–276.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pechère JC: The use of macrolides in respiratory tract infections. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 1993, 3, Supplement: 53–61.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cockburn J, Gibberd RW, Reid AL, Sanson-Fisher RW: Determinants of non-compliance with short-term antibiotic regimens. British Medical Journal 1987, 295: 814–818.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bright GM, Nagel AA, Bordner J, Desai KA, Dibrino JN, Nowakowska J, Vincent L, Watrous RM, Sciavolino FC: Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo activity of novel 9-deoxo-9a-aza-9a-homoerythromycin A derivatives; a new class of macrolide antibiotics, the azalides. Journal of Antibiotics 1988, 41: 1029–1047.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Retsema J, Girard A, Schelkly W, Manousos M, Anderson M, Bright G, Borovoy R, Brennan L, Mason R: Spectrum and mode of action of azithromycin (CP-62,993), a new 15-membered-ring macrolide with improved potency against gram-negative organisms. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1987, 31: 1939–1947.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Foulds G, Shepard RM, Johnson RB: The pharmacokinetics of azithromycin in human serum and tissues. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 1990, 25, Supplement A: 73–82.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Foulds G, Chan KH, Johnson JT, Shepard RM, Johnson RB: Concentrations of azithromycin in human tonsillar tissue. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 1991, 10: 853–856.

    Google Scholar 

  15. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards: Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests. Order code M2-A4. NCCLS, Villanova, PA, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hamill J: Multicentre evaluation of azithromycin and penicillin V in the treatment of acute streptococcal pharyngitis and tonsillitis in children. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 1993, 31, Supplement E: 89–94.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Weippl G: Multicentre comparison of azithromycin versus erythromycin in the treatment of paediatric pharyngitis/tonsillitis caused by group A streptococci. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 1993, 31, Supplement E: 95–101.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bottaro G, Rotolo N, Bonforte S, Bucchieri R, De-Luca R, Ficarra G, Gulino AF, Melillo PA, Nicosia A, Prestifilippo F: Evaluation of the clinical efficacy of azithromycin for acute respiratory infections in children. Clinica Terapeutica 1994, 144: 35–39.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Müller O: Comparison of azithromycin versus clarithromycin in the treatment of patients with upper respiratory tract infection. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 1993, 31, Supplement E: 137–146.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hooton TM: A comparison of azithromycin and penicillin V for the treatment of streptococcal pharyngitis. American Journal of Medicine 1991, 91, Supplement 3A: 23S-26S.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gatley MS: To be taken as directed. Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners 1968, 16: 39–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bergman AB, Werner RJ: Failure of children to receive penicillin by mouth. New England Journal of Medicine 1963, 268: 1334–1338.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Greenberg RN: Overview of patient compliance with medication dosing: a literature review. Clinical Therapeutics 1984, 6: 592–599.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O'Doherty, B., Pilfors, G., Quinn, P.T. et al. Azithromycin versus penicillin V in the treatment of paediatric patients with acute streptococcal pharyngitis/tonsillitis. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 15, 718–724 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01691958

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01691958

Keywords

Navigation