Abstract
Introduction: Although several controlled clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy and good tolerability of 1% pimecrolimus cream for the treatment of atopic dermatitis, the results of these trials may not apply to real-life usage. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a pimecrolimus-based regimen in daily practice.
Methods: This was a 6-month, open-label, multicenter study in 947 patients aged ≥3 months with atopic dermatitis of all severities. The investigators incorporated 1% pimecrolimus cream into patients’ standard treatment protocols on the basis of their clinical diagnosis. Use of topical corticosteroids was allowed at the discretion of the physician. Safety and tolerability were evaluated by monitoring adverse events. Efficacy was evaluated by recording changes in the Investigators’ Global Assessment scores and pruritus scores at each visit.
Results: No clinically unexpected adverse events were reported. The discontinuation rate for adverse events was 2.3%. The disease improvement rate was 53.7% at week 1 and 66.9% at week 24. The pimecrolimus-based regimen was particularly effective for the treatment of lesions involving the face (improvement rate: 61.9% at week 1 and 76.7% at week 24). The greatest therapeutic response was experienced by pediatric patients with mild or moderate disease. Nonetheless, 64% and 65% of infants and children, respectively, with severe/very severe facial disease at baseline were clear/almost clear of signs of atopic dermatitis on their face at week 24. In patients aged <18 years, most of the improvement occurred within the first week of treatment, while in adults a progressive improvement was observed over the entire study period. Worsening of disease by the end of the study occurred in 9.5% of patients and was most frequent in adults (12.6%). The discontinuation rate for unsatisfactory therapeutic effect was 4.8%. The mean number of treatment days was 135.6 (SD 53.2). The mean drug consumption (non-US centers only) was 4.2g per treatment day. Drug consumption decreased over time as disease improved. In total, 47% of patients who completed the study never used topical corticosteroids over 6 months.
Conclusion: In daily practice, incorporation of 1% pimecrolimus cream into patients’ standard treatment regimen is well tolerated and improves atopic dermatitis in approximately two-thirds of patients. Disease improvement is particularly evident on the face. The greatest therapeutic response is experienced by pediatric patients with mild or moderate disease. In these patients, most of the improvement is observed within 1 week from the start of treatment.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The use of trade names is for product identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement.
References
Leung DY, Hanifin JM, Charlesworth EN, et al. Disease management of atopic dermatitis: a practice parameter. Joint Task-Force on Practice Parameters, representing the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, the American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology. Work Group on Atopic Dermatitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 1997; 79: 197-211
Williams HC. Is the prevalence of atopic dermatitis increasing? Clin Exp Dermatol 1992; 17: 385-91
Schultz LF. The epidemiology of atopic dermatitis. Monogr Allergy 1993; 31: 9-28
Kay J, Gawkrodger DJ, Mortimer MJ, et al. The prevalence of childhood atopic eczema in a general population. J Am Acad Dermatol 1994; 30: 35-9
Williams H, Robertson G, Stewart A, et al. Worldwide variations in the prevalence of symptoms of atopic eczema in the international study of asthma and allergies in childhood. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1999; 103: 125-38
Su JC, Kemp AS, Varigos GA, et al. Atopic eczema: its impact on the family and financial costs. Arch Dis Child 1997; 76: 159-62
Lewis-Jones MS, Finlay AY, Dykes PJ. The infants’ dermatitis quality of life index. Br J Dermatol 2001; 144: 104-10
Schiffner R, Schiffner-Rohe J, Landthaler M, et al. Treatment of atopic dermatitis and impact on quality of life: a review with emphasis on topical non-corticosteroids. Pharmacoeconomics 2003; 21: 159-79
Hepburn D, Yohn JJ, Weston WI. Topical steroid treatment in infants, children, and adolescents. Adv Dermatol 1994; 9: 225-54
Hanifin JM, Tofte SJ. Update of therapy of atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1999 Sep; 104 (3 Pt 2): S123-S5
Rainier SS. Managing pediatric atopic dermatitis. Clin Pediatr 2000; 39: 1-14
Abeck D, Strom K. Optimal management of atopic dermatitis. Am J Clin Dermatol 2000; 1: 41-6
Hill CJ, Rosenberg Jr A. Adverse effects from topical corticosteroids. Cutis 1978; 21: 624-8
Stoppolino G, Prisco F, Santinelli R, et al. Potential hazards of topical steroid therapy. Am J Dis Child 1983; 137: 1130-1
Lewis-Jones S. Atopic dermatitis in childhood. Hosp Med 2001; 62: 136-43
Queille C, Pommarede R, Samat JH. Efficacy versus systemic side effects of six topical steroids in the treatment of atopic dermatitis of childhood. Pediatr Dermatol 1984; 1: 246-53
Turpeinen M, Salo OP, Leisti S. Effect of percutaneous absorption of hydrocortisone on adrenocortical responsiveness in infants with severe skin disease. Br J Dermatol 1986; 115: 475-84
Turpeinen M. Influence of age and severity of dermatitis on the percutaneous absorption of hydrocortisone in children. Br J Dermatol 1988; 118: 517-22
Goossens A. Contact allergic reactions on the eyes and eyelids. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol 2004; (292): 11-7
Foti C, Bonifazi E, Casulli C, et al. Contact allergy to topical corticosteroids in children with atopic dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 2005; 52: 162-3
du Vivier A. Tachyphylaxis to topically applied steroids. Arch Dermatol 1976; 112: 1245-8
Kligman AM, Frosch PJ. Steroid addiction. Int J Dermatol 1979; 18: 23-31
Singh G, Singh PK. Tachyphylaxis to topical steroids measured by histamine-induced wheal suppression. Int J Dermatol 1986; 25: 324-6
Zheng PS, Lavker RM, Lehmann P, et al. Morphologic investigations on the rebound phenomenon after corticosteroid-induced atrophy in human skin. J Invest Dermatol 1984; 82: 345-52
Ellis C, Luger T, Abeck D, et al. International Consensus Conference on Atopic Dermatitis II (ICAAD II): clinical update and current treatment strategies. Br J Dermatol 2003; 148 (63 Suppl.): 3-10
Drake LA, Dinehart SM, Farmer ER, et al. Guidelines of care for the use of topical glucocorticosteroids. American Academy of Dermatology. J Am Acad Dermalot 1996; 35: 615-9
Paller A, McAllister RO, Doyle JJ, et al. Perception of physicians and pediatric patients about atopic dermatitis, its impact and its treatment. Clin Pediatr 2002; 41: 323-32
Fischer G. Compliance problems in paediatric atopic eczema. Australas J Dermatol 1996; 37: 10-3
Charm an CR, Morris AD, Williams HC. Topical corticosteroids phobia in patients with atopic eczema. Br J Dermatol 2000; 142: 931-6
Fukaya M. Why do patients with atopic dermatitis refuse to apply topical corticosteroids? Dermatology 2000; 201: 242-5
McAlister RO, Tofte SJ, Doyle JJ, et al. Patient and physician perspectives vary on atopic dermatitis. Cutis 2002; 69: 461-6
Grassberger M, Baumruker T, Enz A, et al. A novel anti-inflammatory drug, SDZ ASM 981, for the treatment of skin diseases: in vitro pharmacology. Br J Dermatol 1999; 141: 264-73
Stuetz A, Grassberger M, Meingassener JG. Pimecrolimus (Elidel, SDZ ASM 981): preclinical pharmacologic profile and skin selectivity. Semin Cutan Med Surg 2001; 20: 233-41
Wellington K, Jarvis B. Topical pimecrolimus: a review of its clinical potential in the management of atopic dermatitis. Drugs 2002; 62: 817-40
Meingassener JG, Grassberger M, Fahmgruber H, et al. A novel anti-inflammatory drug, SDZ ASM 981, for the topical and oral treatment of skin diseases: in vivo pharmacology. Br J Dermatol 1997; 137: 568-76
Queille-Roussel C, Paul C, Duteil C, et al. The new topical ascomycin derivative SDZ ASM 981 does not induce skin atrophy when applied to normal skin for 4 weeks: a randomized, double blind controlled study. Br J Dermatol 2001; 144: 507-13
Van Leent EJM, Ebelin M-E, Burtin P, et al. Low systemic exposure after repeated topical application of pimecrolimus (Elidel©, SDZ ASM 981) in patients with atopical dermatitis. Dermatology 2002; 204: 63-8
Wolff K, Stuetz A. Pimecrolimus for the treatment of inflammatory skin disease. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2004; 5: 643-55
Luger T, van Leent EJM, Graeber M, et al. SDZ ASM 981: an emerging safe and effective treatment for atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 2001; 144: 788-94
Harper J, Green A, Scott G, et al. First experience of topical SDZ ASM 981 in children with atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 2001; 144: 781-7
Meurer M, F61ster-Holst R, Wozel G, et al. Pimecrolimus cream in the long-term management of atopic dermatitis in adults: a six-month study. Dermatology 2002; 205: 271-7
Eichenfield LF, Lucky AW, Boguniewicz M, et al. Safety and efficacy of pimecrolimus (ASM 981) cream 1% in the treatment of mild and moderate atopic dermatitis in children and adolescents. J Am Acad Dermatol 2002; 46: 495-504
Kapp A, Papp K, Bingham A, et al. Long-term management of atopic dermatitis in infants with topical pimecrolimus, a nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drug. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2002; 110: 277-84
Wahn U, Bos JD, Goodfield M, et al. Efficacy and safety of pimecrolimus cream in the long-term management of atopic dermatitis in children. Pediatrics 2002, 110: 1-8
Ho VC, Gupta A, Kaufmann R, et al. Safety and efficacy of nonsteroid pimecrolimus cream 1 % in the treatment of atopic dermatitis in infants. J Pediatr 2003; 142: 155-62
Luger TA, Lahfa M, F61ster-Holst R, et al. Long-term safety and tolerability of pimecrolimus cream 1 % and topical corticosteroids in adults with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. J Dermatol Treat 2004; 15: 169-78
Papp KA, Werfel T, F61ster-Holst R, et al. Long-term control of atopic dermatitis with pimecrolimus cream 1 % in infants and young children: a two-year study. J Am Acad Dermatol 2005; 52: 240-6
Leung DY, Bieber T. Atopic dermatitis. Lancet 2003; 361: 151-60
Ldbbe J. Secondary infections in patients with atopic dermatitis. Am J Clin Dermatol 2003; 4: 641-54
David TJ, Cambridge GC. Bacterial infection and atopic eczema. Arch Dis Child 1986; 81: 20-3
Bonifazi E, Garofalo L, Pisani V, et al. Role of some infectious agents in atopic dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh) 1985; 114: 98-100
Giannetti A. Viral skin diseases in atopic dermatitis. In: Happle R, Grosshans E, editors. Pediatric dermatology. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1987: 110-3
David TJ, Longson M. Herpes simplex infection in atopic eczema. Arch Dis Child 1985; 60: 338-43
Bork K, Brauninger W. Increasing incidence of eczema herpeticum: analysis of seventy-five cases. J Am Acad Dermatol 1988; 19: 1204-9
Acknowledgements
This study was sponsored by Novartis. S.F. Friedlander has received honoraria and clinical research support from Novartis. S. Kownacki has attended advisory board meetings and lectured for Novartis, and has received an honorarium from the sponsor. The Dalhousie University has received a research grant from Novartis for the conduction of this study by R.G.B. Langley. K. Wolff and J. Lübbe have received research grants from Novartis. S. Wisseh, C. McGeown, B. Abrams, and D. Schneider are employees of Novartis. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. The authors thank the following investigators, listed by country, for their contribution to the NOBEL study: Austria: P. Fritsch, W. Aberer, J. Auboeck, I. Mutz; Belgium: M. De La Brassine, J.M. Lachappelle, J.-M. Naeyaert, J. Lambert, M. Song; Canada: B. Krafchik, G. Searles, J. Prendiville, D. Marcoux, W. Gulliver; France: P. Amblard, J.-M. Bonnetblanc; Germany: P. Hoeger, U. Haustein, M. Sticherling, A. Wollenberg, R. Foelster-Holst, T. Ruzicka, G. Heyer; Italy: A. Giannetti, M. Paradisi, L. Armenio, G.A. Vena, A. Fiocchi; The Netherlands: E.R. Lonnee, P.G.J. van Aubel, A.F.E. Bots, L.W. Barkema, J.J.M. van der Werf, G.J.M. van Doesburg; Spain: F. Javier, M. Casado, M. Lecha, R.P. Vallverdu; Sweden: G. Lilja, H. Beitner, A. Svensson, T. Andersson, A. Vahlquist; Switzerland: M. Anliker, L. Braathen, M.H. Schoeni, R. Lauener, B. Wuethrich, T. Rufli, D. Hohl; UK: B. Bodalia, S. Rowlands, T. Poyner, A. Hetherington, A. Fuat; USA: M. Spraker, N. Levine, P. Qaqundah, J. Powers, A. Iravani, P. Darden II, A. Johnson, P. Murray, M. Chambers, S. Kempers, M. Wells, M. Petrick, M. Scannon, R. Chesney, S. Clark, D. Tashjian, T. Chu, R. Hopp, D. Henry, J. Bautista, L. Butler, S. Galant, C. Kauffman, K. Loven, D. Pariser, W. Teer, E. Walter, S. Capper, M. Levy, A. Nopper, V. Fiedler, T. Fleming, D. Hominck, T. Kahn, M. Noss, J. Bagel, M. Blatter, L. Schneider, C. Smith, C. Johnson, R. Matheson, R. Sidbury, L. Schachner, D. Schneider, R. Conti, A. Paller, A. Kimball.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lübbe, J., Friedlander, S.F., Cribier, B. et al. Safety, Efficacy, and Dosage of 1% Pimecrolimus Cream for the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis in Daily Practice. Am J Clin Dermatol 7, 121–131 (2006). https://doi.org/10.2165/00128071-200607020-00005
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00128071-200607020-00005