Skip to main content
Log in

A Randomised, Double-Blind, Parallel, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of MF 5232 (Mucotrol™), a Concentrated Oral Gel Wafer, in the Treatment of Oral Mucositis

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Drugs in R & D Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: Oral mucositis is a major complication of cytotoxic chemotherapy and radiotherapy associated with significant morbidity, pain, odynophagia, dysgeusia and subsequent dehydration and malnutrition, and effective prophylaxis and/or treatment of this condition is essential. The currently available palliative treatment shows improvement only in patients with mild to moderate mucositis. The primary aim of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy of MF 5232 (Mucotrol™), a concentrated oral polyherbal gel wafer formulation, with placebo in the management of chemoradiation-induced mucositis in cancer patients.

Patients and design: In this randomised, double-blind, pilot study a total of 30 patients of either sex with chemoradiation-induced oral mucositis were randomised to receive MF 5232 (n = 15) or a matching placebo (n = 15) after food three times a day for 7–10 days. Patients were evaluated using validated and standardised scoring systems at baseline and after 7–10 days of treatment.

Results: There were 11 evaluable patients in each treatment group. There was a significant reduction in mean mucositis scores with MF 5232 as follows: WHO (from 3.0 to 1.8), Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (gross score: from 2.8 to 1.8; functional score: from 2.9 to 1.0), and Objective Scoring System (ulceration score: from 7.4 to 4.4; erythema score: from 13.7 to 7.0). There were no significant changes in scores for placebo recipients. The treatments were well tolerated, with the exception of two patients in the treatment group who reported a burning sensation in the mouth after dissolving the wafer.

Conclusion: This pilot study provided positive evidence for the efficacy of MF 5232 therapy in chemoradiation-induced mucositis. This was probably a result of its local analgesic, antioxidant and immunomodulatory activity and wound-healing properties. Further in-depth analysis in a larger number of patients is required to confirm these positive results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Table I
Table II
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The use of trade names is for product identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement.

References

  1. Rankin, KV, Jones DL, eds. Oral health in cancer therapy. A guide for healthcare professionals. Austin (TX): DOEP, Texas Cancer Council, 1999: 1–48

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dose AM. The symptom experience of mucositis, stomatitis and xerostomia. Semin Oncol Nurs 1995; 11: 248–55

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Naidu MU, Ramana GV, Rani PU, et al. Chemotherapy-induced and/or radiation therapy-induced oral mucositis-complicating the treatment of cancer. Neoplasia 2004; 6 (5): 423–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zlotolow IM. General considerations in prevention and treatment of oral manifestation of cancer therapies. In: Bergt AP, Weissman DE, editors. Principles and practice of supportive oncology. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott Raven, 1998: 237

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kostler WJ, Hejna M, Wenzel C, et al. Oral mucositis complicating chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy: options for prevention and treatment. CA Cancer J Clin 2001; 51: 290–315

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Berger AM, Kilroy TJ. Oral complications. In: DeVita Jr VJ, Hellmen S, Rosenberg SA, editors. Principles and practice of oncology. 5th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott Raven, 1997: 2714

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wilkes JD. Prevention and treatment of oral mucositis following cancer therapy. Semin Oncol 1998; 25: 538–51

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sonis ST, Eilers JP, Epstein JB, et al. Validation of a new scoring system for the assessment of clinical trial research of oral mucositis induced by radiation or chemotherapy. Cancer 1999 May 15; 85 (10): 2103–13

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Loprinzi CL, Ghosh C, Camoriano J, et al. Schaefer PL, Novotny PJ, Gerstner JB, et al. Phase III controlled evaluation of sucralfate to alleviate stomatitis in patients receiving fluorouracil based chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 1997; 3: 1235–8

    Google Scholar 

  10. LeVeque FG, Parzuchowski JB, Farinacci GC, et al. Clinical evaluation of MGI 209 an anesthetic film forming agent for relief from painful oral ulcers associated with chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 1992; 12: 1963–8

    Google Scholar 

  11. Menachem O. A randomized controlled clinical trial of the homeopathic medication Traumeel SR in the treatment of chemotherapy induced stomatitis in children undergoing stem cell transplantation. Cancer 2001; 92: 684–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jayashree G, Kurup Muraleedhara G, Sudarslal S, et al. Antioxidant activity of Centella asiatica on lymphoma-bearing mice. Fitoterapia 2003 Jul; 74 (5): 431–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jayathirtha MG, Mishra SH. Preliminary immunomodulatory activities of methanol extracts of Eclipta alba and Centella asiatica. Phytomedicine 2004; 11 (4): 361–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Belcher Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (wholly owned subsidiary of GeoPharma, Inc.) Largo, FL, USA, for funding the study, and the staff of the Department of Radiation Oncology, in particular all residents, radiation technologists and radiation physicists for their assistance with this study. The authors have no potential conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the contents of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. U. R. Naidu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Naidu, M.U.R., Ramana, G.V., Ratnam, S.V. et al. A Randomised, Double-Blind, Parallel, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of MF 5232 (Mucotrol™), a Concentrated Oral Gel Wafer, in the Treatment of Oral Mucositis. Drugs R D 6, 291–298 (2005). https://doi.org/10.2165/00126839-200506050-00005

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00126839-200506050-00005

Keywords

Navigation