Skip to main content
Log in

Bioequivalence Study of Two Ibuprofen Formulations Administered Intravenously in Healthy Male Volunteers

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Clinical Drug Investigation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To compare the systemic bioavailability of two ibuprofen formulations, Pedea® (ibuprofen intravenous [IV] formulation) and Imbun® (ibuprofen intramuscular [IM] formulation) in 18 healthy male volunteers.

Methods

Each subject received a 5 mg/kg dose of ibuprofen base as a short 15-minute IV infusion as the Pedea® ibuprofen IV formulation or as the reference Imbun® IM formulation. Concentrations of R- and S-ibuprofen were measured by a validated HPLC method with a lower limit of quantification of 0.100 μg/mL.

Results

A single 5 mg/kg injection of Pedea® was well tolerated. The most frequent adverse event was a mild to moderate burning sensation along the injection vein probably related to the study treatments. The maximum serum concentration (Cmax) of R- and S- ibuprofen ranged from 20 to 35 μg/mL with both formulations. No statistical differences were observed for either Cmax or area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC). 90% CIs calculated for Cmax and AUC from time zero to infinity (AUC) of R-ibuprofen and S-ibuprofen were included in the bioequivalence range 0.80–1.25. Based on AUC, the mean (SD) relative bioavailability of Pedea® (ibuprofen IV formulation) versus the Imbun® IM reference formulation was 1.06 (0.17) for R-ibuprofen and 1.05 (0.08) for S-ibuprofen.

Conclusion

This study showed that Pedea® (test formulation) is bioequivalent to Imbun® IM (reference formulation) for both R-ibuprofen and S-ibuprofen. The Imbun® IM formulation (lyophilisate) could be replaced by the Pedea® ready-to-use IV solution. Moreover, these results allow a comparison of safety and efficacy data previously generated with either formulation. Consequently, neonatologists, who previously used the IM formulation intravenously for the treatment of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants, will now be able to administer the new ready-to-use IV solution of ibuprofen directly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Table I
Fig. 1
Table II
Fig. 2
Table III
Table IV

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The use of trade names is for product identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement.

References

  1. VanOvermeire B, Smets K, Lecoutere D, et al. A comparison of ibuprofen and indomethacin for closure of patent ductus arteriosus. N Engl J Med 2000; 343(10): 674–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. VanOvermeire B, Follens I, Hartmann S, et al. Treatment of patent ductus arteriosus with ibuprofen. Arch Dis Child 1997; 76: F179–84

    Google Scholar 

  3. Varvarigou A, Bardin C, Beharry K, et al. Early ibuprofen administration to prevent patent ductus arteriosus in premature newborn infants. JAMA 1996; 275(N7): 539–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mosca F, Bray M, Lattanzio M, et al. Comparative evaluation of the effects of indomethacin and ibuprofen on cerebral perfusion and oxygenation in preterm infants with patent ductus arteriosus. J Pediatr 1997; 131: 549–54

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Patel J, Roberts I, Azzopardi D, et al. Randomized double-blind controlled trial comparing the effects of ibuprofen with indomethacin on cerebral hemodynamics in preterm infants with patent ductus arteriosus. Pediatr Res 2000; 47(1): 36–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pezzati J. Effects of indomethacin and ibuprofen on mesenteric and renal blood flow in preterm infants with patent ductus arteriosus. Pediatrics 1999 Dec; 135(6): 733–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Internal CEPHAC Validation Report No. CP005315

  8. Internal CEPHAC Method Validation SOP No. 860

  9. Hauschke D, Steinijans VW, Diletti E. A distribution-free procedure for the statistical analysis of bioequivalence study. Int J of Clin Pharmacol Ther Tox. 1992; 28: No.2 (72–78), 1992; 30( Suppl. 1): S37–43

    Google Scholar 

  10. Davies NM. Clinical pharmacokinetics of ibuprofen, the first 30 years. Clin Pharmacokinet 1998; 34(2): 101–54

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jamali F, Singh NN, Pasutto FM, et al. Pharmacokinetics of ibuprofen enantiomers in humans following oral administration of tablets with different absorption rates. Pharm Res 1988; 5(1): 40–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jamali F, Mehvar R, Russel AS, et al. Human pharmacokinetics of ibuprofen enantiomers following different doses and formulations: intestinal chiral inversion. J Pharm Sci 1992; 81(3): 221–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Oliari J, Tod M, Nicolas P, et al. Pharmacokinetics of ibuprofen enantiomers after single and repeated doses in man. Biopharm Drug Dispos 1992; 13: 337–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hall SD, Rudy AC, Knight PM, et al. Lack of presystemic inversion of (R) to (S)-ibuprofen in humans. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1993, 53(4): 393–400

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors have provided no information on sources of funding or on conflicts of interest directly relevant to the content of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chassard, D., Geneteau, A., Gualano, V. et al. Bioequivalence Study of Two Ibuprofen Formulations Administered Intravenously in Healthy Male Volunteers. Clin. Drug Investig. 24, 739–747 (2004). https://doi.org/10.2165/00044011-200424120-00005

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00044011-200424120-00005

Keywords

Navigation