Skip to main content
Log in

Appropriate pharmacology should be initiated before, during and following percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with left ventricular dysfunction or heart failure

  • Disease Management
  • Published:
Drugs & Therapy Perspectives Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Table I
Table II

References

  1. Lipinski MJ, Vetrovec GW. Medical treatment of patients with heart failure or left ventricular dysfunction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2006; 6(5): 313–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44: el–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. ISIS-4: a randomised factorial trial assessing early oral captopril, oral mononitrate, and intravenous magnesium sulphate in 58050 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction. ISIS-4 (Fourth International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group. Lancet 1995; 345: 669–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Saab FA, Eagle KA, Kline-Rogers E, et al. Comparison of outcomes in acute coronary syndrome in patients receiving statins within 24 hours of onset versus at later times. Am J Cardiol 2004; 94: 1166–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chan AW, Bhatt DL, Chew DP, et al. Early and sustained survival benefit associated with statin therapy at the time of percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation 2002; 105: 691–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pepine CJ, Cohn PF, Deedwania PC, et al. Effects of treatment on outcome in mildly symptomatic patients with ischemia during daily life: the Atenolol Silent Ischemia Study (ASIST). Circulation 1994; 90: 762–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. von Arnim T. Medical treatment to reduce total ischemic burden: total ischemic burden bisoprolol study (TIBBS), a multicenter trial comparing bisoprolol and nifedipine. The TIBBS Investigators. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 25: 231–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dargie HJ, Ford I, Fox KM. Total Ischaemic Burden European Trial (TIBET). Effects of ischaemia and treatment with atenolol, nifedipine SR and their combination on outcome in patients with chronic stable angina: the TIBET Study Group. Eur Heart J 1996; 17: 104–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Shivkumar K, Schultz L, Goldstein S, et al. Effects of propanolol in patients entered in the Beta-Blocker Heart Attack Trial with their first myocardial infarction and persistent electrocardiographic ST-segment depression. Am Heart J 1998; 135: 261–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Yusuf S, Peto R, Lewis J, et al. Beta blockade during and after myocardial infarction: an overview of the randomized trials. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1985; 27: 335–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen ZM, Pan HC, Chen YP, et al. Early intravenous then oral metoprolol in 45852 patients with acute myocardial infarction: randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 366: 1622–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dargie HJ. Effect of carvedilol on outcome after myocardial infarction in patients with left-ventricular dysfunction: the CAPRICORN randomised trial. Lancet 2001; 357: 1385–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Janosi A, Ghali JK, Herlitz J, et al. Metoprolol CR/XL in postmyocardial infarction patients with chronic heart failure: experiences from MERIT-HF. Am Heart J 2003; 146: 721–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pitt B, Remme W, Zannad F, et al. Eplerenone, a selective aldosterone blocker, in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 1309–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gibbons RJ, Abrams J, Chatterjee K, et al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with chronic stable angina: summary article. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients with Chronic Stable Angina). J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 41: 159–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Smith Jr SC, Feldman TE, Hirshfeld Jr JW, et al. ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47: el–121

    Google Scholar 

  17. Popma JJ, Berger P, Ohman EM, et al. Antithrombotic therapy during percutaneous coronary intervention: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest 2004; 126: 576S–599S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mehta SR, Yusuf S, Peters RJ, et al. Effects of pretreatment with clopidogrel and aspirin followed by long-term therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the PCI-CURE study. Lancet 2001; 358: 527–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lincoff AM, Bittl JA, Harrington RA, et al. Bivalirudin and provisional glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade compared with heparin and planned glycoprotein Ilb/IIIa blockade during percutaneous coronary intervention: REPLACE-2 randomized trial. JAMA 2003; 289: 853–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hasdai D, Topol EJ, Califf RM, et al. Cardiogenic shock complicating acute coronary syndromes. Lancet 2000; 356: 749–56

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, White HD, et al. One-year survival following early revascularization for cardiogenic shock. JAMA 2001; 285: 190–2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, Webb JG, et al. Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK (Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock) Investigators. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 625–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Appropriate pharmacology should be initiated before, during and following percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with left ventricular dysfunction or heart failure. Drugs Ther. Perspect 23, 16–20 (2007). https://doi.org/10.2165/00042310-200723060-00005

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00042310-200723060-00005

Navigation