Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Iomeprol — a promising new nonionic contrast medium

  • New drugs and disease management
  • Published:
Drugs & Therapy Perspectives Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dooley M, Jarvis B. Iomeprol. A review of its use as a contrast medium. Drugs 2000 May; 59(5): 1169–1186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Almén T. The etiology of contrast medium recations. Invest Radiol 1994; 29 Suppl. 1: S37–S45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. McClellan B, Stolberg H. Intravascular contrast media. Ionic versus nonionic: current status. Radiol Clin North Am 1991 May; 29(3): 437–54

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fattori R, Piva R, Schicchi F, et al. Iomeprol and iopamidol in cardiac angiography: a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group comparison. Eur J Radiol 1994 May; 18 Suppl. 1: S61–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Morris TW. X-ray contrast media: where are we now, and where are we going? Radiology 1993; 188(1): 11–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gallotti A, Uggeri F, Favilla A, et al. The chemistry of iomeprol and physico-chemical properties of its aqueous solutions and pharmaceutical formulations. Eur J Radiol 1994; 18 Suppl. 1: S1–S12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schräder R, Esch I, Ensslen R, et al. A randomized trial comparing the impact of a nonionic (omeprol) versus an ionic (ioxaglate) low osmolar contrast medium on abrupt vessel closure and ischemic complications after coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999 Feb; 33: 395–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dacaronias D, Minguzzi P, Ugolotti U, et al. Iomeprol vs iopamidol in intraarterial peripheral digital subtraction angiography. Angiology 1992 Sep; 43: 734–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Imai H, Hiruma H, Kumazaki T, et al. Effect of low-osmolality contrast media on red cell filterability. Acta Radiol 1993 May; 34: 214–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bracco S.p.a. Iomeron prescribing information. Milan, Italy, 1999

  11. Schmiedel E. Are the tolerabilities of nonionic contrast media identical? The results of a double-blind randomised multicentre study with iomeprol and iopramide [in German] Aktuelle Radiol 1997; 7(4): 183–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Harding JR, Bertazzoli M, Spinazzi A, A randomized, double-blind, parallel group trial of iomeprol, iohexol and iopamidol in intravenous urography. Br J Radiol 1995 Jul; 68: 712–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Radensky PW, Cahill NE. Universal use of low-osmolality contrast media for the 1990s. Radiology 1997; 203(2): 310–1

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Iomeprol — a promising new nonionic contrast medium. Drugs Ther. Perspect 17, 1–4 (2001). https://doi.org/10.2165/00042310-200117120-00001

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00042310-200117120-00001

Keywords

Search

Navigation