References
Yarker YE, Goa KL. Lenograstim: a review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in neutropenia and related clinical settings. Drugs 1995; 49: 767–93
Seymour A-M, de Campos E, Thatcher N, et al. A single-blind, randomised, vehicle-controlled dose-finding study of recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (lenograstim) in patients undergoing chemotherapy for solid cancers and lymphoma. Eur J Cancer 1995; 31A: 2157–63
Dunn CJ, Goa KL. Lenograstim: an update of its pharmacological properties and use in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and related clinical settings. Drugs 2000; 59(3): 681–717
Ema H, Suda T, Nagayoshi K, et al. Target cells for granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, interleukin-3, and interleukin-5 in differentiation of pathways of neutrophils and eosinophils. Blood 1990; 76(10): 1956–61
Watts MJ, Addison I, Ings SJ, et al. Optimal timing for collection of PBPC after glycosylated G-CSF administration. Bone Marrow Transplant 1998; 21: 365–8
Chevallier B, Chollet P, Merrouche Y, et al. Lenograstim prevents morbidity from intensive induction chemotherapy in the treatment of inflammatory breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1995; 13: 1564–71
Gisselbrecht C, Haioun C, Lepage E, et al. Placebo-controlled phase III study of lenograstim (glycosylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) in aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: factors influencing chemotherapy administration. Leuk Lymphoma 1997; 25: 289–300
Schröder CP, de Vries EGE, Mulder NH, et al. Prevention of febrile leucopenia after chemotherapy in high-risk breast cancer patients: no significant difference between granulocyte-colony stimulating growth factor or ciprofloxacin plus amphotericin B. J Antimicrob Chemother 1999; 43: 741–3
Bonadonna G, Pannuti F, Robustelli G, et al. Phase III study comparing standard dose FNC (5-fluorouracil, mitoxantrone, cyclophosphamide) versus dose-intensive FNC + rHuG-CSF (lenograstim) versus time-intensive FNC + lenograstim in advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients: preliminary results of the CSF-001 study [abstract]. 33rd Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology; 1997 May 17; Denver; 16: 149
Garrone O, Venturini M, Del Mastro L, et al. Dose-intensity and dose density in metastatic breast cancer: final results from GONOMIG-3 randomized study [abstract]. Tumori 1998; 84 Suppl. 1: 58
Gisselbrecht C, Prentice HG, Bacigalupo A, et al. Placebo-controlled phase III trial of lenograstim in bone-marrow transplantation. Lancet 1994; 343: 696–700
Linch DC, Milligan DW, Winfield DA, et al. G-CSF after peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in lymphoma patients significantly accelerated neutrophil recovery and shortened time in hospital: results of a randomized BNLI trial. Br J Haematol 1997; 1199(4): 933–8
Campilho F, Campos A, Vaz CP, et al. Filgrastim versus lenograstim after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: a prospective randomised study [abstract]. Bone Marrow Transplant 1999; 23 Suppl. 1: S81
Gluckman E, Rokicka-Milewska R, Gordon-Smith EC, et al. Results of a randomized study of glycosylated rHuG-CSF lenograstim in severe aplastic anaemia [abstract]. Blood 1998; 92 (Suppl. 1 Pt 1): 376
Rubino C, Laplanche A, Patte C, et al. Cost-minimization analysis of prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor after induction chemotherapy in children with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998; 90: 750–5
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lenograstim shows potential in a wide range of neutropenic and other indications. Drugs Ther. Perspect 17, 1–5 (2001). https://doi.org/10.2165/00042310-200117010-00001
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00042310-200117010-00001