References
American Cancer Society. Lung cancer 1998 facts & figures [online]. American Cancer Society; 1999. Available from: http://www.cancer.org/statistics/cff98/selectedcancers.html [Accessed 1999 Feb 22]
Kelly P, Clancy L. Is the use of chemotherapy justified in non-small cell lung cancer? Drugs Aging 1994 Jan; 4: 1–8
American Society of Clinical Oncology. Clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 1997 Aug; 15: 2996–3018
Goodwin PJ, Shepherd FA. Economic issues in lung cancer: a review. J Clin Oncol 1998 Dec; 16(12): 3900–12
Shoheiber O, Schrogie JJ, Johnson N. Non-small cell lung cancer: a cost of illness study [abstract]. Pharmacotherapy 1996 Jan–Feb; 16: 136
Coukell AJ, Noble S, Faulds D. Vinorelbine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Pharmacoeconomics 1999 Apr; 15(4): 405–17
Le Chevalier T, Brisgand D, Douillard J-Y, et al. Randomized study of vinorelbine and cisplatin versus vindesine and cisplatin versus vinorelbine alone in advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer: results of a European multicenter trial including 612 patients. J Clin Oncol 1994 Feb; 12: 360–7
Evans WK. Cost-effectiveness of vinorelbine alone or vinorelbine plus cisplatin for stage IV NSCLC. Oncology 1998 Mar; 12(3) Suppl. 4: 18–26
Smith TJ, Hillner BE, Neighbors DM, et al. Economic evaluation of a randomized clinical trial comparing vinorelbine, vinorelbine plus cisplatin, and vindesine plus cisplatin for non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 1995 Sep; 13: 2166–73
Laupacis A, Feeny D, Detsky AS, et al. How attractive does a new technology have to be to warrant adoption and utilization? Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluation. Can Med Assoc J 1992; 146: 473–81
Smith TJ, Hillner BE, Desch CE. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of cancer treatment: rational allocation of resources based on decision analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993 Sep 15; 85(18): 1460–74
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vinorelbine-based regimens for NSCLC make pharmacoeconomic sense. Drugs Ther. Perspect 14, 13–16 (1999). https://doi.org/10.2165/00042310-199914040-00005
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00042310-199914040-00005