Skip to main content
Log in

Investigation of Chemometric Calibration Performance Based on Different Chemical Matrix and Signal-to-Noise Ratio

  • Notes
  • Published:
Analytical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The chemometric calibration performance was systematically investigated by two parameters (changing the chemical matrix as well as the signal-to-noise ratio) of the NIR (near-infrared) spectrum. Three different analytes (hexane, cyclohexane, toluene) were selected and heptane was used as a solvent. The degree of spectral difference significantly affected the calibration performance. The largest structural difference between the analyte and the solvent provided the best calibration result for a given signal-to-noise ratio. Additionally, the signal-to-noise ratio of the spectra also directly influenced the calibration performance. Overall, the spectral difference and signal-to-noise ratio were the major factors for governing the chemometric calibration performance, especially in the low-concentration range.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. A. Burns and E. W. Ciurczak, “Handbook of Near-Infrared Analysis”, 1992, Marcel Dekker Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. L. Wetzel, Anal. Chem., 1983, 55, 1165A.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. J. S. Shenk, “Near Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy (NIRS); Analysis of Forage Quality”, USDA Agricultural Handbook, No. 643.

  4. J. S. Shenk, I. Landa, M. R. Hoover, and M. O. Westerhaus, Crop. Sci., 1981, 21(3), 355.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. D. C. Slaughter, K. H. Norris, and W. R. Hruschka, Cereal Chem., 1992, 69(4), 428.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. S. R. Delwiche and K. H. Norris, Cereal Chem., 1993, 70(1), 29.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. L. G. Weyer, Appl. Spectrosc. Rev., 1985, 21(1), 1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Y. A. Woo, H. J. Kim, and H. Chung, Analyst, 1999, 124, 1223.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Y. A. Woo, H. J. Kim, J. H. Cho, and H. Chung, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 1999, 21, 407.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. J. J. Kelly, C. H. Barlow, T. M. Jinguji, and J. B. Callis, Anal. Chem., 1989, 61, 313.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. H. Chung, J. S. Lee, and M. S. Ku, Appl. Spectrosc., 1998, 52, 885.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. J. S. Lee and H. Chung, Vibrational Spectrosc., 1998, 17, 193.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. P. Wu, Y Yang, and H. W. Siesler, Polymer, 2001, 42, 10181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. H. Martens and T. M. Naes, “Multivariate Calibration”, 1989, John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  15. K. R. Beebe, R. J. Pell, and M. B. Seasholtz, “Chemometrics: A Practical Guide”, 1998, John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  16. H. Chung and M. S. Ku, Appl. Spectrosc., 2000, 54, 239.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. E. V. Thomas and D. M. Haaland, Anal. Chem., 1990, 62, 1091.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hoeil Chung.

Additional information

To whom correspondence should be addressed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cho, S., Chung, H. Investigation of Chemometric Calibration Performance Based on Different Chemical Matrix and Signal-to-Noise Ratio. ANAL. SCI. 19, 1327–1329 (2003). https://doi.org/10.2116/analsci.19.1327

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2116/analsci.19.1327

Navigation