Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of Integration Domain on Precision of Measurements in Liquid Chromatography

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Analytical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper focuses on the relative standard deviation (RSD) of measurements obtained by the integration of noisy data in both Monte Carlo simulation and HPLC experiments. No peak overlap is considered. As the integration domain, T, which is symmetrical around the peak center is increased up to ten times the width, o(SD), of a Gaussian peak, the integration over the peak has a minimal RSD at T=(— 1.4σ, +1.4σ) in the measurement model where the white noise is the only error source. This optimal integration domain, if described as T/σ=(—1.4,+1.4) in the scale of width, is shown to be independent of the entire peak area, width and noise level. Similar results are obtained by the Monte Carlo simulation for skewed Gaussian peaks and by differentiating the RSD of a triangle signal with respect to the integration domain. The probability theory proposed here exactly predicts the RSD observed by the simulation for the integration of the Gaussian and non-Gaussian peaks. Although a minimal RSD is not evident in the HPLC data for some aromatic compounds, an important property of the model integration is retained in a trace analysis: the precision of the integration around the optimal domain (e.g., ±1.5σ) is superior to that over a wide domain (e.g., ±4σ).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. N. Dyson “Chromatographic Integration Methods”, Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. R. Snyder, J. Chromatogr. Sci., 10, 200 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. J. P. Foley J. Chromatogr., 384, 301 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Westerberg, Anal. Chem., 41, 1770 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. A. N. Papas and M. F. Delaney, Anal. Chem., 59, 54A (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. R. A. Day, Jr. and A. L. Underwood, “Quantitative Analyst”, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Y. Hayashi and R. Matsuda, Chemom. Intell. Lab Syst., 18, 1 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Y. Hayashi and R. Matsuda, Adv. Chromatogr., 34, 347 (1994).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Y. Hayashi, S. Yoshioka and Y. Takeda, Anal. Chim. cm, 212, 81 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. R. D. B. Fraser and E. Suzuki, Anal. Chem., 41, 37 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Y. Hayashi and R. Matsuda, Anal Set., 5, 459 (1989).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hayashi, Y., Matsuda, R. Influence of Integration Domain on Precision of Measurements in Liquid Chromatography. ANAL. SCI. 10, 553–559 (1994). https://doi.org/10.2116/analsci.10.553

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2116/analsci.10.553

Keywords

Navigation