Abstract
To reduce deaths, morbidity, and social problems from alcohol in Canada, a multi-dimensional robust response is needed, including a comprehensive alcohol control strategy at the provincial, territorial, and federal levels. Alcohol container labels with health and standard drink information are an essential component of this strategy. This commentary provides a rationale for the mandatory labelling of all alcohol products, summarizes Canadian initiatives to date to legislate alcohol container warning labels, and addresses myths and misconceptions about labels. Canadians deserve direct, accessible information about (1) the inherent health risks associated with alcohol consumption, (2) the number of standard drinks per container and volume of a standard drink, and (3) guidance for preventing or reducing consumption-related health risks. Enhanced health labels on alcohol containers are long overdue.
Résumé
Pour réduire les décès, la morbidité et les problèmes sociaux causés par l’alcool au Canada, il est nécessaire de réagir vigoureusement et de manière multidimensionnelle, notamment avec une stratégie globale de mesures de contrôle de la part des gouvernements provinciaux, territoriaux et fédéral. Des étiquettes sur les contenants d’alcool comportant des informations sur la santé et sur ce qui constitue un verre standard sont un élément important et essentiel de cette stratégie. Cette analyse explique les raisons justifiant l’étiquetage obligatoire de tous les produits alcoolisés, résume les initiatives à ce jour pour établir des lois sur les étiquettes de mise en garde sur les contenants d’alcool et réfute les mythes et les idées fausses sur ces étiquettes. Les Canadiens ont le droit d’être informés directement et de manière accessible sur 1) les risques pour leur santé inhérents à la consommation d’alcool, 2) le nombre de verres standards par contenant, et le volume d’un verre standard, et 3) les recommandations pour prévenir et réduire les risques liés à cette consommation. Nous n’avons que trop attendu pour apposer des étiquettes de mise en garde sur la santé sur les contenants d’alcool.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Alcohol is a dangerous drug. Roughly 17,000 Canadians die annually from alcohol-attributable causes, with many more involved in alcohol-attributable hospital stays or emergency room visits (Canadian Substance Use Costs & Harms Scientific Working Group, 2023). Alcohol consumption is associated with numerous chronic diseases, including seven types of cancer. Alcohol is also a factor in various types of trauma and social problems, including fetal alcohol effects, impaired driving crashes, and violence. Many victims are not drinkers nor high-risk drinkers (World Health Organization, 2018).
However, vital information about health risks of alcohol, the number of standard drinks per container, and national drinking guidance are not mandated for labels on alcohol products sold in Canada. By contrast, there are federally mandated warning labels on tobacco and cannabis packages.
People in Canada deserve direct and accessible information about the risks of alcohol. Three label messages should be included on alcohol containers to effectively support consumers in making more informed decisions: (1) the health and safety risks associated with alcohol consumption, (2) the number of Canadian standard drinks in the container and the volume of a standard drink, and (3) alcohol and health guidance for preventing or reducing consumption-related risks.
In this commentary, we provide a rationale for enhanced labels on alcohol containers. Also, we offer insights and evidence on why alcohol warning labels are not currently mandated on all alcohol beverages in Canada, and we refer to international experiences on this topic. We outline the components of proposed enhanced warning labels (Table 1) and provide examples of standard drinks using various alcohol beverage types (Table 2). We also highlight myths and misconceptions about alcohol warning labels and offer rebuttals (Table 3). Finally, we propose recommendations about how to move forward and address opposition from interests who oppose informing people in Canada about the harms from alcohol.
Rationale for enhanced labels on alcohol containers
First, alcohol is deserving of specific attention because of its widespread use and status as Canada’s most popular legal drug. Second, alcohol is associated with a number of social, chronic, and acute health risks and potential harms, many of which are not well known or are poorly understood by the general public. Consumers have a right to know about hazards of the products they are using, regardless of labels’ direct impacts on consumption (Stockwell et al., 2020; World Health Organization, 2022). Third, there is good evidence that labels on alcohol containers can increase awareness of alcohol-related health effects (Greenfield, 1997; Hobin et al., 2020) and can change behaviour (Zhao et al., 2020). Warning labels can reach the majority of consumers, and are seen more often by more frequent consumers (Greenfield, 1997). Fourth, enhanced alcohol labels may offer support for other alcohol strategies and interventions by presenting an indirect rationale for such policies and reinforcing the importance of implementing a comprehensive strategy. For example, Canadian evidence indicates that enhanced labels facilitated knowledge about the link between alcohol and cancer and increased the likelihood of support for alcohol pricing policies (Weerasinghe et al., 2020). And fifth, in our view and that of legal scholars, Canadian manufacturers and suppliers have a legal duty to inform consumers of the risk inherent in the foreseeable use and misuse of their products (Stockwell et al., 2020). This duty to inform consumers extends to the federal, provincial, and territorial governments, given their responsibility to act in the public interest and roles as regulators in all provinces and territories, as well as to distributors of alcohol through government wholesale and retail operations.
Why there are not mandated alcohol warning labels in all Canadian jurisdictions
To date, the Canadian experience with regard to implementing alcohol warning labels has been frustrating. The earlier experience is summarized in a case study by Ogborne et al. (2006). Between 1988 and 1991, four private members bills were presented to the federal Parliament under a Progressive Conservative Government that did not go to the committee stage. In 1995, a bill by Paul Zabo, Liberal backbencher, reached second reading and went to committee. However, in May 1996, Liberal Health Minister David Dingwall opposed this Bill C-222 (35–2), indicating there was no evidence of warning-label effectiveness, and stating that he had been advised by the alcohol industry it would cost $10 million to change the labels (Ogborne et al., 2006).
Despite the support for labels from Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) prevention groups, Mothers Against Drunk Driving (Canada), and other organizations, these legislative initiatives did not succeed. The alcohol industry lobbied MPs, claiming labels were ineffective, based on a selective assessment of the United States label’s experience. The industry also claimed high cost and threatened to withdraw funding for other educational programs if labels were introduced (Ogborne et al., 2006). In 2007, there was another attempt to have mandated labels which did not succeed (House of Commons, Bill C-251 n.d.).
There are currently two Canadian jurisdictions, Yukon and Northwest Territories, which have applied post-manufacturer labels on alcohol containers by local directive since 1991. Label messages include a pregnancy warning (Yukon) and a pregnancy, impaired driving, and general health warning (Northwest Territories).
In 2017, Erin Hobin and Tim Stockwell (two authors of this commentary) initiated a real-world study in Yukon and Northwest Territories using a quasi-experimental design to assess whether and how enhanced warning labels impact consumer perceptions, intentions, and behaviour. In the experimental site in Whitehorse, one of three new warning labels referred to alcohol as a carcinogen, namely: “Chief Medical Officer of Health advises Alcohol can cause cancer Including breast and colon cancers”. The alcohol industry threatened the Yukon Government with legal action and the labels referring to cancer were removed from rotation one month into the study. Legal scholars found that the industry objections were without merit (Stockwell et al., 2020); nevertheless, the research project was impacted by the interference. While there may be other factors which contribute to the absence of mandated alcohol warning labels in Canada, the resistance of the alcohol industry and their success in intimidating and influencing various governmental entities appear to be the pre-eminent explanations.
International comparisons
Alcohol warning labels are required in several countries, although many have not been evaluated for their impact on perceptions, awareness, or behaviour (Giesbrecht et al., 2022). In 43 countries in the Americas, there are warning labels, with about equal number being mandated or voluntary. With exception of the US label introduced in 1989 that refers to multiple risks, these tend to be simple messages such as referring generally to health harm or addiction, or involving icons related to drinking during pregnancy, drinking and driving, or legal age limit (Giesbrecht et al., 2022). The 10 countries of the Commonwealth of Independent States (former USSR) have mandated labels; however, their impact has not been assessed (Neufeld et al., 2020). It is noteworthy that the US labels were more likely to be noticed by high-risk drinkers, impaired drivers, and pregnant women; the labels also stimulated conversations about alcohol (Greenfield, 1997).
Countries such as Australia and New Zealand (Food Standards Australia & New Zealand, 2022) require enhanced label components on alcohol containers, including standard drink information and a pregnancy warning. Ireland will soon implement mandated pregnancy and cancer warnings (Irish Statute Book, 2018). Canada now has the unique opportunity to become a world leader by implementing mandated enhanced health warning labels on alcohol containers, with a design that is based on recent evidence.
A bill currently in the Canadian Senate (B-S254) and a motion (M-61) put forward in the House of Commons speak to renewed public interest in this issue, yet the potential for industry resistance and interference remains, including via promotion of myths and misconceptions about alcohol labels (Table 3).
Recommendations
Achieving mandated enhanced labels on alcohol products in Canada will require strong advocacy and public support. In order to counter common myths and misconceptions about warning labels (Table 3) and other issues raised by commercially vested interests, a robust and multi-dimensional response is strongly advised. Key strategies might include letter-writing and advocacy campaigns, contacting members of parliament and seeking meetings with decision-makers, and coalition building. These communications should highlight the harms from alcohol, benefits of alcohol warning labels, and the perceived legal duty to advise Canadians of alcohol-related risks. Working with other groups committed to reducing alcohol-related harm demonstrates multi-sectoral support for warning labels. Such groups include public health associations and departments, and organizations focused on preventing and treating FASD, preventing cancer, curtailing alcohol-related violence, and reducing impaired driving. The response will also benefit from a strong media-advocacy strategy which will help bring the issues to the attention of people in Canada. Demonstrating the range and strength of support for an evidence-informed approach to warning Canadians about alcohol-related harms will make it easier for decision-makers to take policy action on this issue.
Conclusion
The Federal Government of Canada is already in a position to use its existing authority under the Food and Drugs Act (FDA) to mandate alcohol labels with health warnings, national drinking guidance, and standard drink information to raise awareness among alcohol consumers, potential consumers, and the broader public about the risks associated with alcohol use. Taking such action would be in keeping with the recent call for labels that formed part of the new Canadian Guidance on Alcohol and Health (Paradis et al., 2023).
Data availability
Not applicable.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Budenz, A., Moser, R. P., Eck, R., Agurs-Collins, T., McNeel, T. S., Klein, W. M. P., & Berrigan, D. (2022). Awareness of alcohol and cancer risk and the California Proposition 65 Warning Sign updates: A natural experiment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(11862). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191911862
Canadian Substance Use Costs and Harms Scientific Working Group. (2023). Canadian substance use costs and harms 2007–2020. Prepared by the Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research and the Canadian Centre on Substance Use and Addiction. Ottawa, Ontario.
Food Standards Australia & New Zealand. (2022). Labelling of alcoholic beverages. https://www.foodstandards.gov.au/consumer/labelling/Pages/Labelling-of-alcoholic-beverages.aspx. Accessed 20 Oct 2022.
Giesbrecht, N., Reisdorfer, E., & Rios, I. (2022). Alcohol health warning labels: A rapid review with action recommendations. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, 11676. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811676
Greenfield, T. K. (1997). Warning labels: Evidence of harm reduction from long-term American surveys. In M. Plant, E. Single, & T. Stockwell (Eds.), Alcohol: Minimizing the harm (pp. 105–125). London, England: Free Association Books.
Hobin, E., Weerasinghe, A., Vallance, K., Hammond, D., McGavock, J., Greenfield, T. K., Schoueri-Mychasiw, N., Paradis, C., & Stockwell, T. (2020). Testing alcohol labels as a tool to communicate cancer risk to drinkers: A real-world quasi-experimental study. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 81(2), 249–261.
House of Commons, Government of Canada, Bill C-251. An act to amend the Food and Drug Act (warning labels regarding the consumption of alcohol). Defeated, as of Dec. 12, 2007.
International Agency of Research on Cancer. (2010).Personal habits and indoor combustions. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Humans, 100E, pp. 1–538. Available online: https://monographs.iarc.fr/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/mono100E.pdf. Accessed 25 Oct 2019.
Irish Statute Book. (2018). Public Health (Alcohol) Act. https://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/2018/act/24/section/12/enacted/en/html#sec12. Accessed 20 Oct 2022.
Kokole, D., Anderson, P., & Jané-Llopis, E. (2021). Nature and potential impact of alcohol health warning labels: A scoping review. Nutrients, 13, 3065.
National Alcohol Strategy Advisory Committee. (2015). What is a drink? Communicating drink information to the consumer. Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.
Neufeld, M., Ferreira-Borges, C., & Rehm, J. (2020). Implementing health warnings on alcoholic beverages: On the leading role of countries of the commonwealth of independent states. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17, 8205.
Ogborne, A., Stoduto, G., & Kavanagh, L. (2006). Warning labels on alcohol beverage containers: Public support and policy failure. In N. Giesbrecht, A. Demers, A. Ogborne, R. Room, G. Stoduto, & E. Lindquist (Eds.), Sober reflections: Commerce, public health, and the evolution of alcohol policy in Canada, 1980–2000 (pp. 212–236). McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Paradis, C., Butt, P., Shield, K., Poole, N., Wells, S., Naimi, T., Sherk, A., & the Low-Risk Alcohol Drinking Guidelines Scientific Expert Panels. (2023). Canada’s guidance on alcohol and health: Final report. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Centre on Substance Use and Addiction.
Popova, S., Lange, S., Probst, C., Gmel, G., & Rehm, J. (2017). Estimation of national, regional, and global prevalence of alcohol use during pregnancy and fetal alcohol syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health, 5, e290–e299.
Public Health Agency of Canada. (2021). Release notice – Canadian Cancer Statistics 2021. https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/reports-publications/health-promotion-chronic-disease-prevention-canada-research-policy-practice/vol-41-no-11-2021/canadian-cancer-statistics-2021.html. Accessed 20 Oct 2022.
Schoueri-Mychasiw, N., Weeerasinghe, A. Stockwell, T., Vallance, K., Hammond, D., Greenfield, T., McGavock, J., & Hobin, E. (2020). Use as directed: Do standard drink labels on alcohol containers help consumers drink (ir)responsibly? Real-word evidence from a quasi-experimental study in Yukon, Canada. Drug and Alcohol Review, 40(2), 247–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.13165
Stockwell, T., Solomon, R., O’Brien, P., Vallance, K., & Hobin, E. (2020). Cancer warning labels on alcohol containers: A consumer’s right to know, a government’s responsibility to inform, and an industry’s power to thwart. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 81(2), 284–292.
Weerasinghe, A., Schoueri-Mychasiw, N., Vallance, K., Stockwell, T., Hammond, D., McGavock, J., Greenfield, T. K., Paradis, C., & Hobin, E. (2020). Improving knowledge that alcohol can cause cancer is associated with consumer support for alcohol policies: Findings from a real-world alcohol labelling study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(2), 398.
World Health Organization. (2018). Global status report on alcohol and health 2018 (p. 450). WHO.
World Health Organization. (2022). Health warning labels on alcoholic beverages: Opportunities for informed and healthier choices (p. 32). WHO.
World Heart Federation. (2022). The impact of alcohol consumption on cardiovascular health. https://world-heart-federation.org/wp-content/uploads/WHF-Policy-Brief-Alcohol.pdf. Accessed 1 June 2023
Zhao, J., Stockwell, T., Vallance, K., & Hobin, E. (2020). The effects of alcohol warning labels on population alcohol consumption: An interrupted time series analysis of alcohol sales in Yukon, Canada. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 81(2), 225–237.
Funding
NG received funding from University of Victoria, FM5100.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
NG and TN proposed the manuscript and created the first draft, based on input from the other authors. All authors contributed to several rounds of edits and approved the final revised version.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Conflict of interest
TS and TN have received research funds from government alcohol control monopolies in Canada, Finland and Sweden in the past five years. These funds allow them to conduct research on impacts of policy changes (actual and modelled) on alcohol sales and related harms. TS has also received fees for speaking from this source and both TS and TN have received travel expenses to conduct this work.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Giesbrecht, N., Wettlaufer, A., Vallance, K. et al. Why Canadians deserve to have mandated health and standard drink information labels on alcohol containers. Can J Public Health 114, 973–978 (2023). https://doi.org/10.17269/s41997-023-00786-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17269/s41997-023-00786-1