Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of climate fluctuations on long-term vegetation dynamics in Carolina bay wetlands

  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Carolina bays and similar depression wetlands of the U.S. Southeastern Coastal Plain have hydrologic regimes that are driven primarily by rainfall. Therefore, climate fluctuations such as drought cycles have the potential to shape long-term vegetation dynamics. Models suggest two potential long-term responses to hydrologic fluctuations, either cyclic change maintaining open emergent vegetation, or directional succession toward forest vegetation. In seven Carolina bay wetlands on the Savannah River Site, South Carolina, we assessed hydrologic variation and vegetation response over a 15-year period spanning two drought and reinundation cycles. Changes in pond stage (water depth) were monitored bi-weekly to monthly each year from 1989–2003. Vegetation composition was sampled in three years (1989, 1993, and 2003) and analyzed in relation to changes in hydrologic conditions. Multi-year droughts occurred prior to the 1989 and 2003 sampling years, whereas 1993 coincided with a wet period. Wetland plant species generally maintained dominance after both wet and dry conditions, but the abundances of different plant growth forms and species indicator categories shifted over the 15-year period. Decreased hydroperiods and water depths during droughts led to increased cover of grass, upland, and woody species, particularly at the shallower wetland margins. Conversely, reinundation and longer hydroperiods resulted in expansion of aquatic and emergent species and reduced the cover of flood-intolerant woody and upland species. These semi-permanent Upper Coastal Plain bays generally exhibited cyclic vegetation dynamics in response to climate fluctuation, with wet periods favoring dominance by herbaceous species. Large basin morphology and deep ponding, paired with surrounding upland forest dominated by flood-intolerant pines, were features contributing to persistence of herbaceous vegetation. Drought cycles may promote directional succession to forest in bays that are smaller, shallower, or colonized by flood-tolerant hardwoods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Brooks, R. T. 2004. Weather-related effects on woodland vernal pool hydrology and hydroperiod. Wetlands 24: 104–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, R. T. and M. Hyashi. 2002. Depth-area-volume and hydroperiod relationships of ephemeral (vernal) forest pools in southern New England. Wetlands 22: 247–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casey, W. P. and K. C. Ewel. 2006. Patterns of succession in forested depressional wetlands in North Florida, USA. Wetlands 26: 147–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chmielewski, R. M. 1996. Hydrologic analysis of Carolina bay wetlands at the Savannah River Site, South Carolina. M.S. Thesis. University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, B. S. and L. L. Battaglia. 2001. Hydrology effects on propagule bank expression and vegetation in six Carolina bays. Community Ecology 2: 21–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronk, J. K. and M. S. Fennessy. 2001. Wetland Plants: Biology and Ecology. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Steven, D. and M. M. Toner. 2004. Vegetation of Upper Coastal Plain depression wetlands: environmental templates and wetland dynamics within a landscape framework. Wetlands 24: 23–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golladay, S. W., S. Entrekin, and B. W. Taylor. 1999. Forested limesink wetlands of southwest Georgia: invertebrate habitat and hydrologic variation. p. 197–216. In D. P. Batzer, R. P. Rader, and S. A. Wissinger (eds.) Invertebrates in Freshwater Wetlands of North America: Ecology and Management. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haukos, D. A. and L. M. Smith. 1994. Composition of seed banks along an elevational gradient in playa wetlands. Wetlands 14: 301–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillestad, H. O. and S. H. Bennett, Jr. 1982. Set-aside areas, National Environmental Research Park, Savannah River Plant. U.S. Department of Energy, Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, Aiken, SC, USA. SRO-819-11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hook, D. D. 1984. Waterlogging tolerance of lowland tree species of the South. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 8: 136–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W. C., S. E. Boettcher, K. A. Poiani, and G. R. Guntenspergen. 2004. Influence of weather extremes on the water levels of glaciated prairie wetlands. Wetlands 24: 385–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W. C., B. V. Millett, T. Gilmanov, R. A. Voldseth, G. R. Guntenspergen, and D. E. Naugle. 2005. Vulnerability of northern prairie wetlands to climate change. BioScience 55: 863–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. H. and R. R. Sharitz. 1998. Survival and growth of woody plant seedlings in the understory of floodplain forests in South Carolina. Journal of Ecology 86: 574–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. M., D. H. Van Lear, and S. K. Cox. 1984. A vegetationlandform classification of forest sites within the upper Coastal Plain of South Carolina. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 111: 349–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kantrud, H. A., J. B. Millar, and A. G. van der Valk. 1989. Vegetation of wetlands of the prairie pothole region. p. 132–87. In A. G. van der Valk (ed.) Northern Prairie Wetlands. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keough, J., G. R. Guntenspergen, and J. Grace. 1990. Vegetation and hydrologic characteristics of Carolina bays. Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, Aiken, SC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman, L. K. 1992. Cyclical vegetation dynamics in Carolina bay wetlands. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman, L. K. 1995. Impacts of fire and hydrological regimes on vegetation in depression wetlands of Southeastern USA. p. 10–20. In S. I. Cerulean and R. T. Engstrom (eds.) Fire in Wetlands: A Management Perspective. Proceedings of the 19th Tall Timbers Fire Ecology Conference, Tall Timbers Research Station, Tallahassee, FL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman, L. K., P. C. Goebel, L. West, M. B. Drew, and B. J. Palik. 2000. Depressional wetland vegetation types: a question of plant community development. Wetlands 20: 373–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman, L. K., R. F. Lide, G. Wein, and R. R. Sharitz. 1996. Vegetation changes and land-use legacies of depression wetlands of the western Coastal Plain of South Carolina: 1951–1992. Wetlands 16: 564–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman, L. K. and R. R. Sharitz. 1993. Growth in controlled water regimes of three grasses common in freshwater wetlands of the southeastern USA. Aquatic Botany 44: 345–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman, L. K. and R. R. Sharitz. 1994. Vegetation disturbance and maintenance of diversity in intermittently flooded Carolina bays in South Carolina. Ecological Applications 4: 177–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lide, R. F., B. G. Meentemeyer, J. E. Pinder, III, and L. M. Beatty. 1995. Hydrology of a Carolina bay located on the Upper Coastal Plain of western South Carolina. Wetlands 15: 47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulhouse, J. M., L. E. Burbage, and R. R. Sharitz. 2005a. Seed bank-vegetation relationships in herbaceous Carolina bays: responses to climatic variability. Wetlands 25: 738–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulhouse, J. M., D. De Steven, R. F. Lide, and R. R. Sharitz. 2005b. Effects of dominant species on vegetation change in Carolina bay wetlands following a multi-year drought. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 132: 411–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poiani, K. A. and W. C. Johnson. 1991. Global warming and prairie wetlands: potential consequences for waterfowl habitat. BioScience 41: 611–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radford, A. E., H. E. Ahles, and C. R. Bell. 1973. Manual of the Vascular Flora of the Carolinas. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, P. B., Jr. 1988. National list of plant species that occur in wetlands: national summary. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA. Biological Report 88(24).

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, K. R., D. C. Guynn, Jr., and H. G. Hanlin. 2002. Importance of small isolated wetlands for herpetofaunal diversity in managed, young growth forests in the Coastal Plain of South Carolina. Forest Ecology and Management 163: 43–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schalles, J. F. and D. J. Shure. 1989. Hydrology, community structure, and productivity patterns of a dystrophic Carolina bay wetland. Ecological Monographs 59: 365–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semlitsch, R. D. and J. R. Bodie. 1998. Are small, isolated wetlands expendable? Conservation Biology 12: 1129–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, P. W., C. A. Cole, M. E. Kentula, and R. P. Brooks. 2000. Effects of measurement frequency on water-level summary statistics. Wetlands 20: 148–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharitz, R. R. 2003. Carolina bay wetlands: unique habitats of the Southeastern United States. Wetlands 23: 550–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • South Carolina State Climatology Office. 2004. General climate description and summaries for South Carolina. SC Department of Natural Resources, Columbia, SC, USA. http://www.dnr.state.sc.us/climate/sco/.

    Google Scholar 

  • SPSS Inc. 1999. SYSTAT Version 9. SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, G., T. J. Callahan, J. E. Pyzoha, and C. C. Trettin. 2006. Modeling the climatic and subsurface stratigraphy controls on the hydrology of a Carolina bay wetland in South Carolina, USA. Wetlands 26: 567–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, G., S. G. McNulty, J. P. Shepard, D. M. Amatya, H. Riekerk, N. B. Comerford, W. Skaggs, and L. Swift, Jr. 2001. Effects of timber management on the hydrology of wetland forests in the southern United States. Forest Ecology and Management 143: 227–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B. E. and M. J. Brooks. 1994. Modern climate and water level predictability in a Carolina bay on the SRS: a baseline for interpreting the geoarchaeological record. p. 33–50. In Savannah River Archaeological Research Program (ed.) Annual Review of Cultural Resource Investigations, South Carolina Institute of Archeology and Anthropology University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B. E., D. A. Leeper, M. A. McClure, and A. E. DeBiase. 1999. Ecology of aquatic invertebrates and perspectives on conservation. p. 167–95. In D. P. Batzer, R. P. Rader, and S. A. Wissinger (eds.) Invertebrates in Freshwater Wetlands of North America: Ecology and Management. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Valk, A. G. and C. B. Davis. 1978. The role of seed banks in the vegetation dynamics of prairie glacial marshes. Ecology 59: 322–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Workman, S. W. and K. W. McLeod. 1990. Vegetation of the Savannah River Site: major community types. U.S. Department of Energy, Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, Aiken, SC, USA. SRO-NERP-19.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stroh, C.L., De Steven, D. & Guntenspergen, G.R. Effect of climate fluctuations on long-term vegetation dynamics in Carolina bay wetlands. Wetlands 28, 17–27 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1672/06-117.1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1672/06-117.1

Key Words

Navigation