Abstract
Objectives
To observe the surface characteristics and mechanical behavior of retrieved microimplants under clinically simulating experimental conditions and to investigate the feasibility of reuse of microimplants.
Materials and methods
The microimplants, inserted at different angles, were retrieved from the patients (RMIP) and the artificial bone (RMIA). Surface characteristics, including morphologic changes of tips and thread edges, length reduction, and surface compositional variation, were evaluated using a field emission scanning electron microscope, a stereoscopic microscope, and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, respectively. Mechanical behavior comprising maximum insertion torque (MIT) and insertion time was tested with the artificial bone under clinically simulating conditions.
Results
The tips and thread edges were worn out to various degrees in retrieved microimplants and thin deposits were observed on the surface in the RMIP group. Traces of foreign elements, such as iron, sulphur, and calcium, were detected on the surface of RMIP. Both MIT and insertion time of retrieved microimplants were increased compared to their initial use, and were much greater in RMIP. The increases of MIT were seen in all groups inserted at the insertion angle of 45° compared with 90°, although the differences were not statistically significant.
Conclusions
Retrieved microimplants exhibited different degrees of changes on surface characteristics and mechanical behavior, with more changes in RMIP. The reuse of microimplants for immediate relocation in the same patient may be acceptable; however, postponed relocation and allogeneic reuse of microimplants are not recommended in clinical practice.
中文概要
目的
在临床模拟试验条件下,观察正畸微小种植体临 床用后的表面特征与力学性能,探讨正畸微小种 植体再使用的可行性。
创新点
比较了两种回收来源的正畸微小种植体(临床用 后回收和植入人工骨后回收)的表面特征与力学 性能,同时还考虑了不同植入角度的影响。
方法
将符合纳入条件的临床用后正畸微小种植体回 收,另将新正畸种植体以不同角度植入临床模拟 条件下的人工骨并取出回收,分别比较了不同来 源正畸微小种植体的表面特征以及力学性能。使 用场发射扫描电镜、立体显微镜以及X 射线能谱 仪评估了正畸微小种植体尖端及螺纹的形态和 长度变化,以及表面元素变化等表面特征;并在 临床模拟试验条件下测试了最大植入扭矩和植 入时间等力学性能(图1)。
结论
不同回收来源的正畸微小种植体表现出表面特征 以及力学性能的不同变化。临床用后回收的正畸 微小种植体尖端及螺纹表现出更多的磨损,其表 面附着有一薄层沉积物,最大植入扭矩以及植入 时间增大明显。建议正畸微小种植体再使用时, 针对同一患者在某些临床条件下可考虑植入后 立即取出并以一定角度再植入,但是临床使用过 一段时间的正畸种植体尤其是微小种植体不建 议再次植入;针对不同患者,临床操作中不建议 微小种植体的再次使用。
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alrbata RH, Ha DW, Yu W, et al., 2015. Optimal asymmetric thread for orthodontic microimplants: laboratory and clinical evaluation. Angle Orthod, 85(4):585–590. https://doi.org/10.2319/050314-320.1
ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials), 2013. ASTM-F543-02: Standard Specification and Test Methods for Metallic Medical Bone Screws. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, USA.
Chaddad K, Ferreira AF, Geurs N, et al., 2008. Influence of surface characteristics on survival rates of mini-implants. Angle Orthod, 78(1):107–113. https://doi.org/10.2319/100206-401.1
Chung CJ, Jung KY, Choi YJ, et al., 2014. Biomechanical characteristics and reinsertion guidelines for retrieved orthodontic miniscrews. Angle Orthod, 84(5):878–884. https://doi.org/10.2319/092613-703.1
Dentos, 2014. Orthdontic microimplant (AbsoAnchor®) system. http://dentos.co.kr [Accessed on Mar. 1, 2016].
Eliades T, Zinelis S, Papadopoulos MA, et al., 2009. Characterization of retrieved orthodontic miniscrew implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 135(1):10.e11-10.e17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.06.019
Estelita S, Janson G, Chiqueto K, et al., 2014. Effect of recycling protocol on mechanical strength of used miniimplants. Int J Dent, 2014:424923. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/424923
Gross JM, Nascimento GG, Araujo VC, et al., 2016. Mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage surface analysis after redrilling and sterilization—an in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract, 17(4):300–305. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1845
Iijima M, Muguruma T, Kawaguchi M, et al., 2015. In vivo degradation of orthodontic miniscrew implants: surface analysis of as-received and retrieved specimens. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 26(2):71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-015-5405-7
Lee NK, Baek SH, 2010. Effects of the diameter and shape of orthodontic mini-implants on microdamage to the cortical bone. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 138(1):8.e1-8.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.02.019
Lim SA, Cha JY, Hwang CJ, 2008. Insertion torque of orthodontic miniscrews according to changes in shape, diameter and length. Angle Orthod, 78(2):234–240. https://doi.org/10.2319/121206-507.1
Mattos CT, Oliveira AC, Elias CN, 2010. Is it possible to re-use mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage results of an in vitro study? Mat Res, 13(4):521–525. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-14392010000400015
Moon CH, Lee DG, Lee HS, et al., 2008. Factors associated with the success rate of orthodontic miniscrews placed in the upper and lower posterior buccal region. Angle Orthod, 78(1):101–106. https://doi.org/10.2319/121706-515.1
Motoyoshi M, Hirabayashi M, Uemura M, et al., 2006. Recommended placement torque when tightening an orthodontic mini-implant. Clin Oral Implants Res, 17(1):109–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01211.x
Motoyoshi M, Matsuoka M, Shimizu N, 2007a. Application of orthodontic mini-implants in adolescents. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 36(8):695–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2007.03.009
Motoyoshi M, Yoshida T, Ono A, et al., 2007b. Effect of cortical bone thickness and implant placement torque on stability of orthodontic mini-implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 22(5):779–784.
Motoyoshi M, Uemura M, Ono A, et al., 2010. Factors affecting the long-term stability of orthodontic miniimplants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 137(5): 588.e581–588.e585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.05.019
Noorollahian S, Alavi S, Rafiei E, 2015. The effect of multiple processing and re-use on orthodontic mini-screw torque values. Dent Res J (Isfahan), 12(3):243–247.
Park HS, Bae SM, Kyung HM, et al., 2001. Micro-implant anchorgae for treatment of skeletal Class I bialveolar protrusion. J Clin Orthod, 35(7):417–422.
Park HS, Jeong SH, Kwon OW, 2006. Factors affecting the clinical success of screw implants used as orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 130(1): 18–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.11.032
Park HS, Lee YJ, Jeong SH, et al., 2008. Density of the alveolar and basal bones of the maxilla and the mandible. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 133:30–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.044
Patil P, Kharbanda OP, Duggal R, et al., 2015. Surface deterioration and elemental composition of retrieved orthodontic miniscrews. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 147(4 Suppl): S88–S100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.10.034
Song YY, Cha JY, Hwang CJ, 2007. Mechanical characteristics of various orthodontic mini-screws in relation to artificial cortical bone thickness. Angle Orthod, 77(6):979–985. https://doi.org/10.2319/090606-363.1
Togni F, Baras F, Ribas Mde O, et al., 2011. Histomorphometric analysis of bone tissue repair in rabbits after insertion of titanium screws under different torque. Acta Cir Bras, 26(4):261–266. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-86502011000400003
Ueda M, Matsuki M, Jacobsson M, et al., 1991. The relationship between insertion torque and removal torque analyzed in fresh temporal bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 6:442–447.
Vasoglou M, Chrysomali E, Zinelis S, et al., 2014. Retrieval analysis of immediately loaded orthodontic mini-implants: material and tissue characterization. Eur J Orthod, 36(6): 683–689. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjt097
Wawrzinek C, Sommer T, Fischer-Brandies H, 2008. Microdamage in cortical bone due to the overtightening of orthodontic microscrews. J Orofac Orthop, 69(2):121–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-008-0742-5
Wilmes B, Su YY, Drescher D, 2008. Insertion angle impact on primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants. Angle Orthod, 78(6):1065–1070. https://doi.org/10.2319/100707-484.1
Yadav S, Upadhyay M, Liu S, et al., 2012. Microdamage of the cortical bone during mini-implant insertion with self-drilling and self-tapping techniques: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 141(5):538–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.12.016
Acknowledgements
We thank Wonjae YU (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea) for his help on the mechanical test.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lu, L., Park, HS. Surface characteristics and mechanical behavior of retrieved orthodontic microimplants. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 19, 372–382 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B1700324
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B1700324